A rerouting-controlled ISL handover protocol for LEO satellite networks

  • Dong, Wei (College of Computer Science, Sichuan University) ;
  • Wang, Junfeng (College of Computer Science, Sichuan University) ;
  • Huang, Minhuan (National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Information System Security, Beijing Institute of System Engineering) ;
  • Tang, Jian (National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Information System Security, Beijing Institute of System Engineering) ;
  • Zhou, Hongxia (Sichuan Military District)
  • Received : 2011.11.04
  • Accepted : 2012.09.20
  • Published : 2012.10.31

Abstract

In this paper, a rerouting-controlled ISL (Inter-Satellite link) handover protocol for LEO satellite networks (RCIHP) is proposed. Through topological dynamics and periodic characterization of LEO satellite constellation, the protocol firstly derives the ISL related information such as the moments of ISL handovers and the intervals during which ISLs are closed and cannot be used to forward packet. The information, combined with satellite link load status, is then been utilized during packet forwarding process. The protocol makes a forwarding decision on a per packet basis and only routes packets to living and non-congested satellite links. Thus RCIHP avoids periodic rerouting that occurs in traditional routing protocols and makes it totally unnecessary. Simulation studies show that RCIHP has a good performance in terms of packet dropped possibility and end-to-end delay.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. Hu and V.O.K. Li. Satellite-based internet: a tutorial. Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 39, no. 3, pp.154-162, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1109/35.910603
  2. Ferreira A, Caltier J, Penna P. Topological design, routing and hand-over in satellite networks. In Stojmenovic I. ed. Handbook of Wireless Networks and Mobile Computing, John Wiley and Sons. 2002.
  3. I. F. Akyildiz, H. Uzunalioglu, and M. D. Bender, "Handover management in low earth orbit (LEO) satellite networks" Mobile Networks and Applications, vol. 4, no. 4, pp.301-310, Dec 1999. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019167303222
  4. P. K. Chowdhury, M. Atiquzzaman, and W. Ivancic, "Handover schemes in satellite networks: state-of-the-art and future research directions," IEEE Communications Surveys, vol. 8, no. 4, 4th Quarter 2006. Link).
  5. Junfeng Wang, Lei Li, and Mingtian Zhou, "Topological dynamics characterization for LEO satellite networks", Computer Networks, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 43-53, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2006.04.010
  6. H. Uzunalio˘glu, "Probabilistic routing protocol for low Earth orbit satellite networks", in IEEE ICC, pp. 88-93, 1998.
  7. H. Uzunalio glu, I.F. Akyildiz, Y. Yesha, and W. Yen,"Footprint handover rerouting protocol for low Earth orbit satellite networks",ACM Journal on Wireless Networks, vol. 5, no. 5, pp.327-337, Oct 1999. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019127801155
  8. M. Werner et al., "ATM-based Routing in LEO/MEO Satellite Networks with Intersatellite Links," IEEE JSAC, vol. 15, no. 1, Jan. 1997, pp. 69-82.
  9. E. Ekici, I.F. Akyildiz and M.D. Bender, "A distributed routing algorithm for datagram traffic in LEO satellite networks", IEEE/ACM Transaction on Networking, vol. 9, no. 2, ,pp. 137-147, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1109/90.917071
  10. F.Alagoz, O. Korcak, A. Jamalipour, "Exploring the routing strategies in next generation satellite networks", IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine 14, vol. 3, pp. 79-88, 2007.
  11. Brunt P. IRIDIUM: Overview and Status, Space Communication, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 61-68, 1997.
  12. D.B. Johnson. A note on dijkstra's shortest path algorithm. Journal of the ACM, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 385-388, 1973. https://doi.org/10.1145/321765.321768