DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Bioleaching Kinetics of Spent Catalyst by Adapted and Unadapted Iron & Sulfur Oxidizing Bacteria - Effect of Pulp Density; Particle Size; Temperature

  • Pradhan, Debabrata (Mineral Resources Research Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM)) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Jin (Mineral Resources Research Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM)) ;
  • Ahn, Jong-Gwan (Division of Energy resources, Jungwon University) ;
  • Gahan, Chandra Sekhar (Mineral Resources Research Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM)) ;
  • Chung, Hun-Saeng (Department of Nano-biochemistry, Konyang University) ;
  • Lee, Seoung-Won (Nano Engineering Division, School of Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2011.02.16
  • Published : 2011.12.25

Abstract

Bioleaching studies of metals from a spent catalyst were conducted using both adapted and unadapted bacterial cultures. The bacterium used in this experiment was Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. A comparison of the kinetics of leaching was made between the two cultures by varying the leaching parameters, including the pulp density, particle size and temperature. Both cultures showed similar effects with respect to the above parameters, but the leaching rates of all metals were higher with the adapted compared to the unadapted bacterial cultures. The leaching reactions were continued for 240 h in the case of the unadapted bacterial culture, but only for 40 h in the case of the adapted bacterial culture. The leaching reactions followed first order kinetics. In addition, the kinetics of leaching was concluded to be a diffusion control model; therefore, the product layers were impervious.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF)

References

  1. I.A. Raj and K.I. Vasu, J. Appl. Electrochem. 20, 32 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01012468
  2. Molyreview, International Molybdenum Association, January (2010).
  3. R.R. Moskalyk and A.M. Alfantazi, Min. Eng. 16, 793 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-6875(03)00213-9
  4. H.P. Kuck, "Mineral Commodity Summaries 2006: Nickel". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 2008-11-19.
  5. B. ZareNezhad, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 15, 143 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2008.08.020
  6. P. Dufresne, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 322, 67 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2007.01.013
  7. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Hazardous waste management system, Federal Register, 68(202), 559359 (2003).
  8. K.H. Park, D. Mohapatra, and C.W. Nam, J. Haz. Mat. 148, 287 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.02.034
  9. T.Y. Jeong, G.C. Cha, S.H. Yeom, and S.S. Choi, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 14, 333 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2007.09.014
  10. D. Pradhan, D.J. Kim, J.G. Ahn, G.R. Chaudhury, and S.W. Lee, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 16, 866 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2010.03.006
  11. D.J. Kim, D. Pradhan, J.G. Ahn, and S.W. Lee, Hydromet. 103, 136 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.03.010
  12. D. Pradhan, D. Mishra, D.J. Kim, G.R. Chaudhury, and S.W. Lee, Hydromet. 99, 157 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2009.07.014
  13. C.L. Brierley, Mining Magazine, ISSN 0308-6631, 201, 324-328 (2010)
  14. C.L. Brierley, Hydrometallurgy. 104, 324 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.03.021
  15. H.M. Li and J.J. Ke, Hydromet. 61, 151 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(01)00167-0
  16. M. Elzeky and Y.A. Attia, Chem. Eng. J. 56, B115 (1995).
  17. M.P. Silverman and D.G. Lundgren, J. Bacteriol. 77, 642 (1959).
  18. D. Pradhan, J.G. Ahn, D.J. Kim, and S.W. Lee, Kor. J. Chem. Eng. 26, 736 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-009-0123-9
  19. J. Li, H. Hou, J. Gan, S. Zhu, and Y. Xie, Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 12, 541 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11859-006-0071-8
  20. T. Rohwerder, T. Gehrke, K. Kinzler, and W. Sand, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 63, 239 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-003-1448-7
  21. G.J. Olson and T.R. Clark, Hydromet. 93, 10 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2008.02.013
  22. M.N. Chandraprabha, J.M. Modak, K.A. Natarajan, and A.M. Raichur, Min. Eng. 15, 751 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-6875(02)00129-2
  23. D.R Tipre and S.R. Dave, Hydromet. 75, 37 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2004.06.002
  24. A.D. Bailley and G.S. Hansford, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 42, 1164 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260421006
  25. H.Y. Sohn and M.E. Wadsworth, Rate process of extractive metallurgy, Plenum, New York (1979).