DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Homogeneity of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ultrafine Grained OFHC Cu Bars Processed by ECAP

ECAP 가공에 의해 제조된 초미세립 OFHC Cu 봉재의 미세조직 및 기계적 특성의 균질성

  • Received : 2011.02.10
  • Published : 2011.06.25

Abstract

Bars of OFHC Cu with the diameter of 45 mm were processed by equal channel angular pressing up to 16 passes via route $B_c$, and homogeneity of their microstructures and mechanical properties was examined at every four passes which develop the equiaxed ultrafine grains. In general, overall hardness, yield strength and tensile strength increased by 3, 7, and 2 times respectively compared with those of unECAPed sample. Cross-sectional hardness exhibited a concentric distribution. Hardness was the highest at the center of bar and it decreased gradually from center to surface. After 16 passes, overall hardness decreased due to recovery and partial recrystallization. Regardless of the number of passage, yield strength and tensile strength were quite uniform at all positions, but elongation showed some degree of scattering. At 4 passes, coarse and ultrafine grains coexisted at all positions. After 4 passes, uniform equiaxed ultrafine grains were obtained at the center, while uniform elongated ultrafine grains were manifested at the upper half position. At the lower half position, grains were equiaxed but its size were inhomogeneous. It was found that inhomogeneity of grain morphology and grain size distribution at different positions are to be attributed to scattering in elongation but they did not affect strength. The present results reveal the high potential of practical application of equal channel angular pressing on fabrication of large-sized ultrafine grained bars with quite homogeneous mechanical properties.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Grant : 국방기초(개별기초)연구사업

Supported by : 국방과학연구소

References

  1. R. Z. Valiev, Met. Mater. Int. 7, 413 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03027081
  2. R. Z. Valiev and T. G. Langdon, Prog. Mater. Sci. 51, 881 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.003
  3. T. C. Lowe and R. Z. Valiev, JOM. 56, 64 (2004).
  4. V. V. Stolyarov, Y. T. Zhu, G. I. Raab, A. I. Zharikov, and R. Z. Valiev, Mater. Sci. Eng. A385, 309 (2004).
  5. Z. Horita, T. Fujinami, and T. G. Langdon, Mater. Sci. Eng. A318, 34 (2001).
  6. R. Srinivasan, B. Cherukuri, and P. K. Chaudhury, Mater. Sci. Forum. 503-504, 371 (2006).
  7. C. Xu, M. Furukawa, Z. Horita, and T. G. Langdon, Mater. Sci. Eng. A398, 66 (2005).
  8. M. Prell, C. Xu and T. G. Langdon, Mater. Sci. Eng. A480, 449 (2008).
  9. K. -T. Park, Y. S. Kim, J. G. Lee, and D. H. Shin, Mater. Sci. Eng. A293, 165 (2000).
  10. P. B. Prangnell, C. Harris, and S. M. Roberts, Scripta Mater. 37, 983 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(97)00192-9
  11. H. S. Kim, M. H. Seo, and S. I. Hong, Mater. Sci. Eng. A291, 86 (2000).
  12. H. S. Kim, Mater. Sci. Eng. A315, 122 (2001).
  13. S. C. Yoon and H. S. Kim, J. Kor. Inst. Met. & Mater. 47, 699 (2009).
  14. S. C. Yoon, A. V. Nagasekhar, and H. S. Kim, Met. Mater. Int. 15, 219 (2009).
  15. R. Z. Valiev, R. K. Islamgaliev, and I.V.Alexandrov, Prog. Mater. Sci. 24, 103 (2000).