Journal of Gifted/Talented Education (영재교육연구)

The Korean Society for the Gifted (한국영재학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of Factors Effecting on Gifted Students' Achievement : Self-determination, Learning Goal-orientation, Self-efficacy, Implicit Theory of Intelligence, and Self-regulated Learning Strategy

영재의 학업성취에 영향을 주는 심리적 요인들: 자기결정성, 학습목표지향성, 자기효능감, 지능관 및 자기조절학습전략을 중심으로

  • Received : 2011.07.31
  • Accepted : 2011.09.23
  • Published : 2011.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate which psychological factors influence on the gifted students' achievement. As a psychological factor, self-determination, learning goal-orientation, self-efficacy, belief of intelligence, and self-regulated learning strategy were examined. The difference in psychological factors between the gifted with high achievement and the gifted with low achievement was to explored. For the study 128 gifted students' data from second-year data of Korean Education Longitudinal Study (KELS) were selected and analyzed. The findings indicate that the predictors of gifted students' achievement are extrinsic regulation, identified regulation, mastery-approach goal, self-efficacy, elaboration, and meta-cognition factor. Especially, the factor of elaboration and identified regulation are the strongest predictors. The findings from t-test analysis indicate that the gifted with low achievement show the low level in self-determination, mastery-approach, self-efficacy, elaboration, meta-cognition, place management and seeking social assistance from teacher. Therefore the developing elaboration, one of regulation learning strategy, is essential to improve the achievement of the gifted students with low scores.

본 연구는 영재들의 학업성취에 영향을 주는 심리적 요인인 자기결정성, 학습목표지향성, 자기효능감, 지능관 및 자기조절학습전략의 영향력을 조사하는데 목적이 있다. 또한 영재들 중 학업성취가 높은 학생과 낮은 학생들의 심리적 특성에 차이가 있는지도 살펴보았다. 한국교육종단연구 자료 중 중학교 2학년 영재학생 128명의 자료가 최종 분석되었다. 분석 결과 외적 조절동기는 학업성취에 부적영향을 주는 것으로 나타났고 확인된 조절동기, 숙달접근, 자기효능감, 정교화, 초인지 전략은 정적영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 단계적 중다 회귀분석을 통해 학업성취에 영향을 준 6개 하위요인들의 상대적 영향력을 비교하였는데 분석결과 영재들의 학업성취는 정교화에 의해 15.5% 가량이 설명되었고 확인된 조절동기에 의해 추가로 5% 정도 더 설명되었다. 독립표본 t 검정 분석결과 학업성취가 낮은 영재학생들은 자기결정성, 숙달접근성, 자기효능감, 정교화, 초인지, 공간관리, 교사도움에서 낮은 수준을 보였다. 따라서 성적이 낮은 중학교 영재들의 학업문제를 해결하기 위해서는 우선적으로 정교화 인지전략을 발달시킬 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김주환, 김은주, 홍세희 (2006). 한국 남녀 중학생 집단에서 자기결정성이 학업성취도에 주는 영향. 교육심리연구, 20(1), 243-264.
  2. 김아영, 박인영 (2001). 학업적 자기효능감 척도 개발 및 타당화 연구. 교육학연구, 39(1), 95-123.
  3. 류관열, 엄우용, 최성열 (2010). 중․고등학생의 학업적 자기효능감, 타인기대와 학업성취도 관계에서 자기조절학습전략의 효과. 교육심리연구, 24(3), 661-685.
  4. 문병상 (2000). 학업적 자기조절 검사 도구 개발. 교육평가연구, 13(1), 239-260.
  5. 문병상 (2009). 인식론적 신념, 성취목표지향성, 자기조절학습 및 학업성취간의 관계. 초등교육연구, 22(4), 49-68.
  6. 박병기, 송정화 (2008). 변화신념, 목표지향성, 자기조절학습, 학업성취 및 주관적 안녕의 인과구조 탐색: Dweck 모형의 확장. 교육심리연구, 22(2), 333-350.
  7. 박병기, 채선영 (2005). 학업수행 자기효능감 척도 개발 및 타당화. 교육심리연구, 19(4), 1219-1240.
  8. 박승호, 박지희 (2003). 중학생의 자기조절학습에 관여하는 초인지, 초동기 및 의지통제와 학업성취와의 관계. 교육심리연구, 17, 1-17.
  9. 송인섭, 박성윤 (2000). 목표지향성, 자기조절학습, 학업성취와의 관계 연구. 교육심리연구, 14(2), 29-64.
  10. 신영회 (2005). 중학교 과학수학 영재학생과 일반 학생의 학업적 자기조절동기 유형과 실패내성 및 자아존중감과의 관계. 석사학위논문. 이화여자대학교.
  11. 이경란 (2005). 미성취 영재아 성취 영재의 자기조절학습전략 차이 비교. 석사학위논문. 건국대학교.
  12. 이미순, 류가애 (2011). 초등 영재 및 일반 학생의 상대적 자율성에 대한 학습동기 연속체관점. 초등교육연구, 24(1), 155-173.
  13. 이신동, 유미선, 최병연 (2008). 초등 영재와 일반학생간의 학업성패에 대한 귀인성향과 자기조절학습전략 사용의 차이. 영재교육연구, 18(3), 425-442.
  14. 이주화, 김아영 (2005). 학업성취목표지향성 척도 개발. 교육심리연구, 19(1), 311-325.
  15. 조현철 (2011). 내외적 학습동기, 자기결정성, 목표지향, 자기지각, 지능관 및 자기조절학습 전략 요인들의 학습태도, 학습행동 및 학업성취에 대한 효과. 교육심리연구, 25(1), 33-60.
  16. 최병연 (2009). 초등영재와 일반아동의 자기결정성동기와 자기조절학습간의 관계 분석. 영재와 영재교육, 8(2), 85-104.
  17. 한국교육개발원 (2007). 한국교육종단연구2005(III): 조사개요보고서. 서울: 한국교육개발원.
  18. 한기순, 신정아 (2007). 성취영재와 미성취영재는 어떻게 다른가?: 학습전략, 동기, 능력신념, 그리고 문제해결성향의 차이분석. 영재교육연구, 17(1), 27-50.
  19. 한순미 (2003). 중다목표관점에서 성취목표와 자기조절 학습전략 사용간의 관계. 교육심리연구, 17, 291-312.
  20. 한순미 (2004). 학습동기 변인들과 인지전략 및 학업성취간의 관계. 교육심리연구, 18(1), 329-350.
  21. Ablard, K. E., & Mills, C. J. (1996). Implicit theories of intelligence and self-perceptions of academically talented adolescents and children. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25(2), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537340
  22. Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structure, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
  23. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  24. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  25. Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optional motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 706-722. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.706
  26. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
  27. Bouffard-Bouchard, T., Parent, S., & Larivee, S. (1993). Self-regulation on a concept-formation task among average and gifted students. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1993.1028
  28. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
  29. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of motivation, human development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
  30. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. The Educational Psychologist, 74, 852-859.
  31. Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
  32. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
  33. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
  34. Elliot, A., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218
  35. Elliot, A., & McGregor, H. (2001). A $2{\times}2$ achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholgoy, 80, 501-519. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
  36. Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on achievement: goals, perceived ability, and reasoning engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0015
  37. Henderson, V., & Dweck, C. S. (1990). Motivation and achievement. In S. S. Feldman, & G. R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 308-329). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  38. Malpass, J., O'Neil, H., & Hocevar, D. (1999). Self-regulation, goal orientation, self-efficacy, worry, and high-stakes math achievement for mathematically gifted high school students. Roeper Review, 21, 281. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553976
  39. Marzooghi, R, Sheikholeslami, R., & Shamshiri, B. (2009). Comparing achievement goal orientations of Iranian gifted and nongifted Schoolchildren. Journal of Applied Sciences, 9, 1990-1993. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2009.1990.1993
  40. McCoach D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 144-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700205
  41. Neber, H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: the role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130220132316
  42. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  43. Radosevich, D. J., Vaidyanathan, V. T., Yeo, S., & Radosevich, D. M. (2004). Relating goal orientation to self-regulatory processes: A longitudinal field test. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 207-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(03)00032-8
  44. Risemberg, R., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1992). Self- regulated learning in gifted students. Roeper Review, 15, 98-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199209553476
  45. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  46. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  47. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York, NY: Harper collins College.
  48. Yoon, C. H. (2009). Self-regulated learning and instructional factors in the scientific inquiry of scientifically gifted Korean middle school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(3), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209334961
  49. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of students self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284-290. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.284
  50. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51
  51. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Springer Verlag.