Study of Mu-acupuncture Treatment Focusing to the Pulse Diagnosis and 'Yu'

맥진(脈診)과 '유(痏)'를 중심으로 한 무자법(繆刺法)연구

  • Jee, Jae-Dong (Department of Physiology, College of Oriental Medicine, Daegu Haany University) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Joong (Department of Physiology, College of Oriental Medicine, Daegu Haany University)
  • 지재동 (대구한의대학교 한의과대학 생리학교실) ;
  • 김광중 (대구한의대학교 한의과대학 생리학교실)
  • Received : 2011.07.13
  • Accepted : 2011.10.15
  • Published : 2011.10.25

Abstract

'Mu-acupuncture treatment(繆刺法)' and 'Geo-acupuncture treatment(巨刺法)' are the ways of taking acupuncture points on the sound side of a human body and not on the unsound side of a human body to treat disease, 'Mu-acupuncture treatment(繆刺法)' is applicable to 'Transverse meridian disease(絡脈病)', 'Geo-acupuncture treatment(巨刺法)' is applicable to 'Longitudinal meridian disease(經脈病)'. To diagnose a disease as transverse meridian disease or longitudinal meridian disease depends on 'Feeling pulse at the nine spots of three parts on a body for diagnosis (三部九候診)'. 'Mu-acupuncture treatment(繆刺法)' takes a 'Rak-acupuncture point(絡穴)' under a wrist and a ankle joint. The method of taking it, two ways, are 'Yu(痏)' and 'The treatment getting some blood(出血療法)'. 'Yu(?)' which is similar to 'Quick-getting acupuncture into and out (單刺法)' means the number of times doing acupuncture and is different from 'The treatment getting some blood (出血療法)' which is typically considered as 'Yu(?)'. Meanwhile, judging from the changes of the methods of feeling pulse for diagnosis and the symptoms of a certain disease, though it is a precondition that 'Biased-Gi(邪氣)' stays at 'The Large transverse meridian(大絡)' in 'The theory of Mu-acupuncture treatment(繆刺論)', it is hard to consider the symptoms of 'Transverse meridian disease(絡脈病)' described in 'The theory of Mu-acupuncture treatment(繆刺論)' as the pure symptoms of 'Transverse meridian disease(絡脈病)'.

Keywords

References

  1. 白裕相. 黃帝內經의 繆刺法과 巨刺法에 대한 考察. 醫林社, p 316, 2005.
  2. 李 潔. 絡脈文獻的整理與硏究. 成都中醫藥大學博士學位論文. 2006.
  3. 王 氷. 黃帝內經靈樞. 大成出版社, 미상.
  4. 王 氷. 黃帝內經素問. 大成出版社, 미상.
  5. 羅慶燦朴炫局. 黃帝內經의 脈理論과 診脈法의 變化에 關한 硏究. 東國大韓醫大硏究所論文集. 2(1), 1993.
  6. 唐湘淸編著. 難經今釋. 臺北市, 正中書局, 1983.
  7. 金垠希. 黃帝內經三部九候論에 關한 硏究. 東國大學校碩士學位論文. 2005.
  8. 山田慶兒著, 이성규 譯. 중국의학은 어떻게 시작되었는가. 서울, 사이언스북스, 2002.
  9. 李慶雨譯. 編注譯解黃帝內經靈樞1. 서울, 여강출판사, 2000.
  10. 張介賓原著, 譯類經飜譯推進會. 譯註類經9. 서울, 海東出版社, 2001.
  11. 李慶雨譯. 編注譯解黃帝內經素問3. 서울, 여강출판사, 1997.
  12. 이준근. 黃帝內經素問중 瀉血에 關한 硏究. 圓光大學校博士學位論文. 2007.
  13. 趙大震. 藏腑病證과 經絡病證區分에 關한 硏究. 慶熙大學校博士學位論文. 2003.
  14. 李慶雨譯. 編注譯解黃帝內經素問2. 서울, 여강출판사, 1995.
  15. 楊上善著. 黃帝內經太素. 서울, 大星文化社, 1986.
  16. 박춘하 外7人. 留針에 관한 文獻的考察. 大韓鍼灸學會誌. 20(1), 2003.
  17. 대구한의사회 편집부. 개원한의사 침구치료의 설문조사. 대구광역시한의학회지. (14), 2008.
  18. 金達鎬編著. 校勘舍岩道人針法. 부산, 소강, 1998.
  19. 정인기 外2人. 五輸穴을 이용한 針法의 比較考察. 大韓鍼灸學會誌. 18(2), 2001.
  20. 蔡禹錫. 董氏奇穴集成. 서울, 一中社, 1997.
  21. 任韓帝. 經脈診斷의 脈診法이 氣口脈의 寸關尺六部定位脈診法으로 演變된 緣由에 關한 硏究. 東國大學校博士學位論文. 2003.
  22. 黃龍祥著, 朴炫局外2人共譯. 中國鍼灸學術史大綱. 서울, 法仁文化社, 2005.