Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effects of total-etch, wet-bonding, and light-curing of adhesive on the apical seal of a resin-based root canal filling system

접착제의 접착변수가 레진계 근관충전제의 근단밀폐효과에 미치는 영향

  • Ryu, Won-Il (Department of Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Shon, Won-Jun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Baek, Seung-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, In-Han (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Cho, Byeong-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute)
  • 류원일 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치의학과) ;
  • 손원준 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 백승호 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 이인한 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 조병훈 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보존학교실)
  • Received : 2011.06.23
  • Accepted : 2011.07.31
  • Published : 2011.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the effects of adhesion variables such as the priming concepts of canal wall and the curing modes of adhesives on the sealing ability of a resin-based root canal filling system. Materials and Methods: Apical microleakage of the Resilon-RealSeal systems filled with 3 different combinations of adhesion variables was compared with the conventional gutta-percha filling using a dye penetration method. Experimental groups were SEDC, Resilon (Resilon Research LLC) filling with self-etch RealSeal (SybronEndo) primer and dual-cure RealSeal sealer; NELC, Resilon filling with no etching, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (3M ESPE) primer application and light-curing adhesive; and TELC, Resilon filling with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose primer and adhesive used under total etch / wet bonding and lightcure protocols. GPCS, gutta-percha filling with conventional AH26 plus sealer, was the control group. Results: The median longitudinal dye penetration length of TELC was significantly shorter than those of GPCS and SEDC (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.05). In the cross-sectional microleakage scores, TELC showed significant differences from other groups at 2 to 5 mm from the apical foramen (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.05). Conclusions: When a resin-based root canal filling material was used, compared to the self-etching primer and the dual-cure sealer, the total etch/wet-bonding with primer and light-curing of adhesive showed improved apical sealing and was highly recommended.

연구목적: 본 연구는 치근벽의 전처리 개념과 접착제의 중합방법이 레진계 근관충전제의 치근단 밀폐능에 미치는 영향을 평가하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 3가지 다른 접착변수를 조합하여 충전한 Resilon-RealSeal 시스템의 근단미세누출을 색소침투법을 이용하여 통상의 가타퍼쳐 충전과 비교하였다. 실험군은 자가부식형 RealSeal primer와 이중중합형 RealSeal sealer를 이용하여 Resilon 충전한 SEDC군, 산부식없이 Scotchbond Multi-Purpose primer를 적용한 후 접착제는 광중합하고 Resilon을 충전한 NELC군, 및 Scotchbond Multi-Purpose의 접착강화제와 접착제를 total etch/wet bonding과 광중합의 술식을 정확하게 지켜서 Resilon을 충전한 TELC군으로 구분하였다. 대조군(GPCS)에서는 통상의 AH26 plus sealer를 사용하여 가타퍼쳐를 충전 하였다. 결과: 치아장축방향의 색소침투는 TELC군에서 GPCS군과 SEDC군에 비해 유의하게 작았다(Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.05). 횡단면의 미세누출 점수도 TELC군이 근첨으로부터 2 - 5 mm의 범위에서 다른 군에 비해 유의하게 낮았다(Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.05). 결론: 레진계 근관충전제를 사용 시에는, 자가부식형 전처리제와 이중중합형 sealer보다는, total etch/wet bonding 개념과 적절한 광중합을 도모하는 전처리제 및 접착제의 사용이 치근단 미세누출을 감소시키므로 추천된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Baumgartner JC, Falkler WA Jr. Bacteria in the apical 5 mm of infected root canals. J Endod 1991;17:380-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81989-8
  2. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr, Bate AL, Pitt Ford TR. Histologic investigation of root canal-treated teeth with apical periodontitis: a retrospective study from twentyfour patients. J Endod 2009;35:493-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.014
  3. Epley SR, Fleischman J, Hartwell G, Cicalese C. Completeness of root canal obturations: Epiphany techniques versus gutta-percha techniques. J Endod 2006;32:541-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.059
  4. Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N. Evaluation of root canal obturation: a three-dimensional in vitro study. J Endod 2009;35:541-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.021
  5. Shipper G, Orstavik D, Teixeira FB, Trope M. An evaluation of microbial leakage in roots filled with a thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based root canal filling material (Resilon). J Endod 2004;30:342-347. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200405000-00009
  6. Nagas E, Uyanik MO, Sahin C, Durmaz V, Cehreli ZC. Effects of different light-curing units and obturation techniques on the seal of the Resilon/Epiphany system. J Endod 2008;34:1230-1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.011
  7. Shipper G, Teixeira FB, Arnold RR, Trope M. Periapical inflammation after coronal microbial inoculation of dog roots filled with gutta-percha or resilon. J Endod 2005;31:91-96. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000140569.33867.bf
  8. Pawin′ska M, Kierklo A, Marczuk-Kolada G. New technology in endodontics - the Resilon-Epiphany system for obturation of root canals. Adv Med Sci 2006;51 (Supplement 1):154-157.
  9. Oook S, Miyazaki M, Rikut A, Moore BK. Influence of polymerization mode of dual-polymerized resin direct core foundation systems on bond strengths to bovine dentin. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:239-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.020
  10. Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Influence of polymerization mode on degree of conversion and micropush-out bond strength of resin core systems using different adhesive systems. Dent Mater J 2008;27:376-385. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.376
  11. Ariyoshi M, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Influence of filling technique and curing mode on the bond strengths of composite cores to pulpal floor dentin. Dent Mater J 2010;29:562-569. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-104
  12. Cadenaro M, Antoniolli F, Sauro S, Tay FR, Di Lenarda R, Prati C, Biasotto M, Contardo L, Breschi L. Degree of conversion and permeability of dental adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:525-530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00251.x
  13. Navarra CO, Cadenaro M, Codan B, Mazzoni A, Sergo V, De Stefano Dorigo E, Breschi L. Degree of conversion and interfacial nanoleakage expression of three one-step self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117: 463-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00654.x
  14. Ferracane JL, Greener EH. The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:121-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820200111
  15. Dickens SH, Cho BH. Interpretation of bond failure through conversion and residual solvent measurements and Weibull analyses of flexural and microtensile bond strengths of bonding agents. Dent Mater 2005;21:354-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.007
  16. Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:267-282.
  17. Xu Q, Fan MW, Fan B, Cheung GS, Hu HL. A new quantitative method using glucose for analysis of endodontic leakage. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:107-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.06.006
  18. Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Endodontic leakage studies reconsidered. Part I. Methodology, application and relevance. Int Endod J 1993;26:37-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1993.tb00540.x
  19. Chailertvanitkul P, Saunders WP, Mackenzie D. An assessment of microbial coronal leakage in teeth root filled with gutta-percha and three different sealers. Int Endod J 1996;29:387-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01403.x
  20. Wedding JR, Brown CE, Legan JJ, Moore BK, Vail MM. An in vitro comparison of microleakage between Resilon and gutta-percha with a fluid filtration model. J Endod 2007;33:1447-1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.08.021
  21. Biggs SG, Knowles KI, Ibarrola JL, Pashley DH. An in vitro assessment of the sealing ability of Resilon/Epiphany using fluid filtration. J Endod 2006; 32:759-761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.013
  22. Shemesh H, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Leakage along apical root fillings with and without smear layer using two different leakage models: a two-month longitudinal ex vivo study. Int Endod J 2006;39:968-976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01181.x
  23. Paque F, Sirtes G. Apical sealing ability of Resilon/Epiphany versus gutta-percha/AH Plus: immediate and 16-months leakage. Int Endod J 2007;40:722-729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01298.x
  24. Onay EO, Ungor M, Unver S, Ari H, Belli S. An in vitro evaluation of the apical sealing ability of new polymeric endodontic filling systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:e49-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.038
  25. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Lambrechts P, Weller RN, Pashley DH. Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modeling approach. J Endod 2005;31:584-589. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000168891.23486.de
  26. Paque F, Luder HU, Sener B, Zehnder M. Tubular sclerosis rather than the smear layer impedes dye penetration into the dentine of endodontically instrumented root canals. Int Endod J 2006;39:18-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01042.x
  27. Hiraishi N, Papacchini F, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Ferrari M, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Shear bond strength of Resilon to a methacrylate-based root canal sealer. Int Endod J 2005;38:753-763. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01012.x