DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국제천문 및 천체물리 올림피아드 현황과 기출문항에 대한 과학탐구 유형 분석

PRESENT STATUS AND SCIENTIFIC FACTOR ANALYSIS ON ITS PAST PROBLEMS OF THE INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIAD ON ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS

  • 투고 : 2011.06.22
  • 심사 : 2011.07.26
  • 발행 : 2011.09.30

초록

The International Olympiad on Astronomy and Astrophysics (IOAA) initiated by the Thailand Astronomical Society in 2007 is an annual competition for high school students. One of its aim is to enhance the development of international exchange in the field of school education in astronomy and astrophysics. This paper first provides the overview of the IOAA in terms of key regulations based on its statutes, history and current status. Secondly, the published syllabus of the IOAA is used for content analysis according to subject areas regarding the exam questions of the IOAA in theoretical, observational and data analysis parts from 2007 to 2010. Also, a scientific inquiry framework is applied to the same questions for assessment based on scientific inquiry in the cognitive aspect with two sub-classes of scientific knowledge and scientific reasoning. Among a dozen astronomy subject areas listed on the syllabus, the theoretical part of the IOAA makes more frequent use of the Sun, the solar system, properties of stars, and concept of time. In content knowledge, a factor of scientific knowledge, the IOAA questions, especially in the theoretical part have a lesser degree in difficulty than the IAO (International Astronomy Olympiad) exam questions for the same period whose degree in difficulty is comparable to college level. With regard to scientific reasoning, the IOAA questions tend to involve convergent rather than divergent thinking. Lastly, in light of these findings, discussions are given on the outcome of Korean participation in the previous IOAAs and ways to help better in preparing Korean students for future astronomy Olympiads.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 임인성, 최승언, 2004, 국제천문올림피아드 문제에 나타난 인지적 측면의 과학탐구 요소 분석, 한국지구과학회지, 25, 719
  2. 임인성 등, 2008 국제천문올림피아드 현황과 기출문제에 대한 과학탐구 유형분석, 한국천문학회지, 23, 109
  3. 최승언, 2005, 서울대학교 과학영재교육프로그램 평가를 위한 평가틀 개발 및 평가 수행, 서울대학교 연구보고서, 63
  4. 한국교육과정평가원, 2009, 국가교육과정 고등학교 과학과 교육과정, http://www.kice.re.kr
  5. Azar, A., 2005, Analysis of Turkish Highschool Physics-Examination Question and University Entrance Exams Questions according to Blooms' Taxonomy, Journal of Turkish Science Education, 2, 68
  6. Bloom, B. S., 1956, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, (New York: McKay), 56
  7. Chinn, C. A. & Malhotra, B. A., 2002, Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in School: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks, Science Education, 86, 175 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10001
  8. De Vito, A., 1989, Creative Wellsprings for Science Teaching, 2nd Ed. (West Lafayette: Creative Ventures, Inc.), 89
  9. Germann, P. J., Haskins, S., & Auls., S., 1996, Analysis of Nine High School Biology Laboratory Manuals: Promoting Scientific Inquiry, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 475 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199605)33:5<475::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-O
  10. IOAA Syllabus, 2010, The 4th IOAA Booklet Beijing, 51
  11. Karamustafaog, S., 2003, High-School Chemistry-Examination Questions according to Blooms Taxonomy, Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4, 25 https://doi.org/10.1039/b2rp90034c
  12. Park, J. W., 2004, Suggesting a Model of Scientific Creativity and Developing Scientific Creativity Activities, The 8th Asia-Pacific Conference on Giftedness, 104
  13. Sternberg, R. J., 1994, A Triarchic Model for Teaching and Assessing Students in General Psychology, The General Psychologist, 30, 42