Abstract
The purpose of this study is to provide the information of decision making that can be used to improve curriculum of engineering education by surveying and analyzing that educational needs of ${\bigcirc}{\bigcirc}$ university' engineering students about program outcomes. The conclusions of this study are as follows. First, it was found that engineering students surveyed valued much of the necessity of PO2(analysis experiment), PO3(design capability), PO6(teamwork) among program outcomes. In addition, it was found that engineering students surveyed thought their ability was low in PO3(design capability), PO4(problem solving), PO10 (knowledge of current events). Second, it was found that the order of educational needs about program outcomes was PO3(design capability), PO2(analysis experiment), PO1(knowledge application), PO5(practical ability), PO4(problem solving) which suggested that engineering students surveyed had high educational needs for engineering program outcomes. On the other hand, it was found that engineering students surveyed showed lower awareness of PO7, PO10, PO11 which had characteristics of humanities. It is necessary that systematic establishment of course completion system in basic design, element design and comprehensive design by giving weight to design education that aims to strengthen design capability should be made in curriculum of engineering education. It was found that there was considerable difference in educational needs about program outcomes especially in PO1(analysis experiment), PO4(problem solving), PO5(practical ability), PO6(teamwork) according to grade, gender and specialty and therefore this should be considered in designing curriculum. It is judged that operation of flexible education program should be arranged if learning achievement through regular curriculum Is limited.
이 연구의 목적은 ${\bigcirc}{\bigcirc}$대학 공과대학생들의 학습성과에 대한 교육요구를 조사 분석하여, 학습성과를 달성하기 위한 공과대학 교육과정을 개선하는 의사결정 정보를 제공하고자 한다. 이에 따른 연구의 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 공과대학생들은 학습성과 중 PO2(분석 실험), PO3(설계능력), PO6(팀윅)의 필요도를 높게 인식하였고, 학생 자신이 가진 현재 능력은 PO3(설계능력), PO4(문제해결), PO10(시사상식)을 낮게 인식하는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 학습성과의 교육요구도 순위는 PO3(설계능력), PO2(분석 실험), PO1(지식 응용), PO5(실무능력), PO4(문제해결)로 나타나 공학적 학습성과의 교육요구가 높았다. 반면 비교적 융합적이고 인문적 소양의 성격을 가지는 학습성과(PO7, PO10, PO11)는 상대적으로 낮은 인식을 보이고 있었다. 공과대학의 교육과정은 학습성과 중 설계능력을 강화하기 위한 설계교육에 비중을 두어 기초설계, 요소설계, 종합설계의 체계적인 이수체계 확립이 필요하며, 이에 따른 교수학습 제반활동이 지원되어야 한다. 또한 PO1(분석 실험), PO4(문제해결), PO5(실무능력), PO6(팀웍)에서는 학년별, 성별, 전공 계열별로 학습성과에 따른 교육요구도가 다소 큰 차이가 있음을 인식하고 이러한 점을 고려한 교육과정 설계와 개선이 필요하다. 정규교과과정을 통한 학습성과 성취가 제한이 될 경우에는 비교과과정 교육프로그램의 활성화 방안이 마련되어야 한다.
