DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Evaluation and Improvement of Building Maintenance System

건물관리제도의 평가 및 개선방안에 관한 연구

  • Choi, Gul-Sung (Institute of Indoor Air Management affiliated with Korea Association of Building Maintenance)
  • 최걸성 ((사)한국건물위생관리협회 부설 실내공기관리연구소)
  • Received : 2011.03.04
  • Accepted : 2011.08.11
  • Published : 2011.08.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to devise the overall problems (such as, rights and obligations between users, owners, managers regarding commercial rental buildings, benefit/benefit in return, and the relevant regulations and systems) of the building maintenance system through field surveys, expert interviews, and literature reviews. In this rapidly changing society, there are a huge amount of needs for various reforms which can meet the diversity in each area, so it is greatly important to choose priority for the best improvement for efficient and economic expenses due to limited time, human resources and budgets. In this regard, the study extracted the evaluation elements from the devised problems with the viewpoint of BSC, calculated the weights through application of AHP to the extracted evaluation elements, evaluated the difference between before/after application of weights, and set the status, which makes it possible to realize the effective solutions and the reasonable expenses for all parties. By doing so, it is expected that the building maintenance system which maximizes the value and guarantees the user's convenience with smart functions of the building, will be realized in the near future.

본 연구에서는 상업용 임대건물을 대상으로 사용자, 소유자, 관리자 3자와 이들 3면에 발생되는 권리와 의무, 급부와 반대급부에서 나타나는 문제점과 이들을 둘러싼 법과 제도의 문제점을 문헌조사와 전문가 인터뷰 그리고 현장의 설문조사를 통하여 건물관리 제도의 총체적 문제점을 도출하고자 하였다. 현재와 같이 급변하는 시대에 각 분야에서 그들의 다양성에 맞도록 각종 개선을 요구하지만 제한된 시간과 인력 그리고 예산 등의 이유로 최선의 개선에 따른 우선순위는 능률적이고 경제적 지출을 필요로 하는 중요한 사안이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 도출된 문제점에서 BSC관점으로 평가요소를 추출하고 추출된 평가요소에 AHP 기법을 활용하여 가중치를 구한 후 가중치 적용 전 후를 비교 평가하여 중요도를 정함으로써 3자3면을 위한 효과적인 대안과 합리적 지출을 실현할 수 있게 된다. 이로서 향후 건물기능의 스마트화 및 가치의 극대화, 사용자 편익이 보장되는 건물관리제도가 현실화되는 계기를 마련하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Stephen In-ho kim, "Dynamic Management and the General Theory of Enreprise" pp.127, pp.143, Bibong Press Company, 2006
  2. Kim, Il Hyo, "Building Asset Operation and Administration", pp.135, Namdoo Press Cp., 2009
  3. Nho, hwa-jun, Lee dal-gon, Noh, si-pyung, Kim, tae-il, "A Study on the Development of Evaluation Elements and Weight for General Evaluation of Institution", pp.111, Daejong Press, 1996
  4. Lee do-hee . Lee Jong-Sik, "The calculation and application of the weight in result measurement indicator with applying BSC", Accounting Research Paper, Vol.1, pp.71-73, 2000
  5. Cho Keun-Tae, "Aggregation of Multiple Evaluator's Weights in Applying the AHP to Evaluate Technology Alternatives", Management & Technology, Vol.19 No.2, pp.139-153, Nov. 2002,
  6. Hah-Min Han . Il-Sang Ko . Su-Jeong Choi . Jeong-Ju Jang, "Evalution and SelectionFramework for a Venture Film with New Technology in Optical Electronics Industry" A Study of Information System, Vol.18 No.1, pp.106-107, Mar., 2009
  7. Jeung-Hoon Oh . Seung-Jun Kwak, "A Study on the Evaluation of National R&D Projects", Governmental Studies, Vol.9 No.2, pp.102, 2003
  8. Park joo-hyung, Kim jung-heum, "A Comparative Study of MAUT and AHP in Priority Setting of R&D Project", Korea Tecnology Innovation Sociaty, Vol.2 No.2 , pp.201-218, Sep., 1999
  9. Kaplan R.S. and D.P. Norton(1992), "The Balanced Scorecard Measures That Drive Performance" Harvard Businrss Review.
  10. Saaty. Thomas L. & Kearns, Kevin P., "Analytical Planning", Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications, 1985, pp.27
  11. Saaty T. L. "The Analytic Hierachy Process", Interfaces, Vol.24, No.6, pp19-43, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.24.6.19
  12. Saaty. T. L., "Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process" Management Science, 32-7, pp.84, 1986
  13. Vargas. L.G., "An Overview of Analytical Hierarchy Process and Its Application" European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.48, 1990