DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Rapid and Simple Method for the Determination of Pregabalin in Human Plasma using Liquid Chromatography-tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS): Application to a Bioequivalence Study of Daewoong Pregabalin Capsule To Lyrica® Capsule (Pregabalin 150 mg)

  • Received : 2011.07.07
  • Accepted : 2011.08.10
  • Published : 2011.08.20

Abstract

Method using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was developed and validated for the determination of pregabalin in plasma samples. Acquisition was performed by monitoring the transitions: m/z 160.1${\rightarrow}$142.2 for pregabalin and m/z 423.2${\rightarrow}$207.1 for losartan (as an internal standard). After cold acetonitrileinduced protein precipitation of the plasma samples, separation was performed with C18 column by isocratic mobile phase consisted of 10 mM ammonium acetate and acetonitrile (15:85, v/v). Results were linear over the concentration ranged from 0.1 to $10{\mu}g$/mL and the correlation coefficients (r) were $\geq0.99$. Intra- and inter-day precisions were $\leq6.02$ and $\leq11.04%$, respectively, and intra- and inter-day accuracies were 96.60-101.09 and 98.10-102.60%, respectively. This validated method was successfully applied to a bioequivalence study of two formulations of pregabalin, Daewoong pregabalin capsule (Daewoong Pharm. Co., Ltd.) and Lyrica$^{(R)}$ capsule (Pfizer Korea Ltd.) in twenty eight healthy Korean volunteers. The subjects received a single oral dose of each formulation (150 mg as pregabalin) in a randomized $2{\times}2$ crossover study and plasma samples were obtained from each subject at predetermined time intervals. Then, the pharmacokinetic parameters ($AUC_{0-t}$, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$) were calculated and statistically analyzed to assess the differences between two formulations. The 90% confidence intervals for the log-transformed data were acceptable range of log 0.8-log 1.25 (e.g., log 1.0048-log 1.0692 for AUC0-t, log 0.9142-log 1.0421 for $C_{max}$). Thus, $AUC_{0-t}$ and $C_{max}$ met the criteria of the Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA) for bioequivalence test indicating that Daewoong pregabalin capsule was bioequivalent to Lyrica$^{(R)}$ capsule.

Keywords

References

  1. Dooley, D.J., Donovan, C.M., Meder, W.P., Whetzel, S.Z., 2002. Preferential action of gabapentin and pregabalin at P/Q-type voltage-sensitive calcium channels: inhibition of $K^+$-evoked [3H]-norepinephrine release from rat neocortical slices. Synapse. 45, 171-190. https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.10094
  2. Dousa, M., Gibala, P., Lemr, K., 2010. Liquid chromatographic separation of pregabalin and its possible impurities with fluorescence detection after postcolumn derivatization with ophtaldialdehyde. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 53, 717-722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2010.04.008
  3. Framton, J.E., Foster, R.H., 2005. Pregabalin: in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Drugs. 65, 111-118. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200565010-00011
  4. Gee, N.S., Brown, J.P., Dissanayake, V.U.K., Offord, J., thurlow, R., Woodruff, G.N., 1996. The novel anticonvulsant drug, gabapentin (Neurontin), binds to the ${\alpha}_2-{\delta}$ subunit of a calcium channel. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5768-5776. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.10.5768
  5. Gray, P., 2007. Pregabalin in the management of central neuropathic pain. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 8, 3035-3041. https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.8.17.3035
  6. Guay, D.R.P., 2005. Pregabalin in neuropathic pain: a more "pharmaceutically elegant" gabapentin? Am. J. Geriatr. Pharmacother. 3, 274-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjopharm.2005.12.008
  7. Gujral, R.S., Haque, S.M. and Shanker, P., 2009. Development and validation of pregabalin in bulk, pharmaceutical formulations and in human urine samples by UV spectrophotometry. Int. J. Biomed. Sci. 5, 175-180.
  8. Kasawar, G.B. and Farooqui, M.N., 2010. Development and validation of HPLC method for the determination of pregabalin in capsules. Indian. J. Pharm. Sci. 72, 517-519. https://doi.org/10.4103/0250-474X.73935
  9. KFDA, 2009. Guideline for Korean Good Clinical Practice 2009-211.
  10. KFDA, 2010a. Guideline for Bioequivalence Test 2010-43.
  11. KFDA, 2010b. Guideline for the Validation of Bioanalytical Method (2010. 06.).
  12. Lee, Y.J., Chung, S.J., Shim, C.K., BA Calc $2007^{(R)}$ for $Windows^{(R)}$, Version 1.0.0. (2007a)
  13. Lee, Y.J., Chung, S.J., Shim, C.K., K-BE Test $2007^{(R)}$ for $Windows^{(R)}$, Version 1.1.0. (2007b)
  14. Mandal, U., Sarkar, A.K., Gowda, K.V., Agarwal, S., Bose, A., Bhaumik, U., Ghosh, D., Pal, T.K., 2008. Determination of pregabalin in human plasma using LC-MS-MS. Chromatographia. 67, 237-243. https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-007-0440-2
  15. Maneuf, Y.P., Hughes, J., McKnight, A.T., 2001. Gabapentin inhibits the substance P-facilitated K+-evoked release of [3H] glutamate from rat caudal trigeminal nucleus slices. Pain. 93, 191-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00316-5
  16. Vaidya, V.V., Yetal, S.M., Roy, S.M.N., Gomes, N.A., Joshi, S.S., 2007. LC-MS-MS determination of pregabalin in human plasma. Chromatographia. 66, 925-928. https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-007-0430-4
  17. Vermeij, T.A.C., Edelbroek, P.M., 2004. Simultaneous high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of pregabalin, gabapentin and vigabatrin in human serum by precolumn derivatization with o-phtaldialdehyde and fluorescence detection. J. Chromatogr. B. 810, 297-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-0232(04)00662-2
  18. Zareba, G., 2008. New treatment options in the management of fibromyalgia: role of pregabalin. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 4, 1193-1201.

Cited by

  1. Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Determination of Pregabalin in Human Plasma Using Derivatization Method vol.81, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-017-3458-0