Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction (한국강구조학회 논문집)

Korean Society of Steel Construction (한국강구조학회)
권호 표지

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Freeform Diagrid System

비정형 Diagrid System의 내진성능 평가

  • 고창균 (고려대학교 건축사회환경공학과) ;
  • 주영규 (고려대학교 건축사회환경공학과) ;
  • 김상대 (고려대학교 건축사회환경공학과)
  • Received : 2010.05.16
  • Accepted : 2011.03.29
  • Published : 2011.04.27
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Many new structural systems have been developed to build free-form structures, which is the new architectural trend for aesthetic beauty. The diagrid system resists both gravity and later loads, with its perimeter-diagonal columns. In the current seismic-design provisions, however, a seismic-performance factor for a new structural system has not yet been provided. ATC-63 provides a new methodology for defining various seismic-performance factors, including the response modification factor. In this paper, nonlinear static and dynamic analyses were conducted for the 3D diagrid frame, with each load applied at $0-180^{\circ}$ degrees. Through these analyses, the seismic performance of the diagrid system was evaluated.

최근 건축물들이 미적인 아름다움을 추구하며 점차 비정형화 되어감에 따라 이를 실현시켜 주기 위한 새로운 구조시스템들이 개발되고 있다. Diagrid system은 외각에 배치 된 경사진 기둥을 통해 구조물의 중력하중과 횡력을 모두 저항하는 시스템으로 건물 내부에 기둥이 없어 비교적 평면 변화에 유리한 시스템이다. 하지만 현행의 내진설계 기준에는 이와 같은 새로운 구조시스템에 대한 내진성능계수가 명시되어 있지 않다. 이에 새로운 내진성능 평가 방법인 ATC-63이 제안되었다. 본 논문에서는 구조물의 비정형성을 고려해주기 위해 3D 비선형 해석 모델에 각각 작용하는 하중의 방향을 달리하며 ATC-63에서 제시하고 있는 절차에 따라 비정형 Diagrid system의 내진성능을 평가하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. AISC (2005) Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, ANSI/AISC 341-05, American Institute for Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois.
  2. ASCE (2006a) Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 7-05, Including Supplement No. 1, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.
  3. ASCE (2006b) Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI41-06, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.
  4. ATC (1995) Structural Response Modification Factors, Report No. ATC-19, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
  5. ATC (1996) A critical review of current approaches to earthquake-resistant design, Report No.ATC-34, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
  6. ATC (2008) Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, Report No.ATC-63, prepared by the Applied Technology Councilfor the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington,D.C.
  7. FEMA (2004a) NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, FEMA 450-1/2003 Edition, Part1: Provisions, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington,D.C.
  8. FEMA (2004b) NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, FEMA 450-2/2003 Edition,Part2: Commentary, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  9. PERFORM-3D.(2006) Nonlinear Analysis and Performance Assessment for 3D Structures-User Guide, Computers & Structures,Inc., Berkeley,CA.
  10. PEER (2006) PEER NGA Database, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California.
  11. Skidmore, Owings and Merrill LLP. (2008) Methodology to determine R-values for steel diagrid framed systems, Project Report.
  12. Vamvatisikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2000) Incremental dynamic analysis, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.31, pp.491-514