환경영향평가 (Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment)

한국환경영향평가학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수도권 개발제한구역의 경관생태학적 가치평가

An Assessment of Landscape Ecological Value of Greenbelt Areas in the Seoul Metropolitan Area

  • Oh, Kyushik (Department of Urban Planning, Hanyang University) ;
  • Park, Jihye (Department of Urban Planning, Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Dongwoo (Department of Urban Planning, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2011.10.04
  • 심사 : 2011.11.27
  • 발행 : 2011.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Development restriction areas (greenbelt areas) of Korea were recognized in 1970 as a means to control urban sprawl and conserve the natural environment. Although there have been some achievements, for a long time many planners and residents have requested a redefining of the green belt due to individual property rights restrictions and urban management problems. In fact, a lot of the greenbelt area is being destroyed by urban development. Therefore, conservation of ecological spaces in the green belt is needed to maintain urban naturalness. In this regard, this study suggests efficient methods to manage the greenbelt through the adoption of a landscape ecological value assessment. The greenbelt of the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA) is represented as the case study because there has been mounting pressure to develop the area in Korea. In this study, the assessment of the landscape ecology in the greenbelt area focuses on landscape structure and function. The assessment consists of the following steps: First, patches were derived by NDVI analysis using landsat remote sensing data. Second, characteristics of the patches were quantified by analyzing the landscape structure, such as patch size and shape index. Lastly, the gravity model and least cost path analysis to assess connectivity were applied to evaluate the landscape function in the green belt areas. The assessment result showed that 48.45% of green belt area should be conserved to maintain ecological stability and function. Moreover, major ecological networks were identified near the large patches in the northern and southern areas. However, relative low ecological values were identified in the western part of the green belt area due to the lack of green spaces. Furthermore, some development plans in the green belt were also identified near the conservation area. Based on these results, the restoration needed areas to enhance ecological value in green belt were displayed. This study suggests efficient management of the greenbelt area, which is disappearing as a result of urban development. The area for conservation chosen in this study should be managed carefully in urban planning. Finally, the results of this study can be used in green belt polices and plans for the promotion of ecological naturalness and stability.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 국토해양부, 2006, 개발제한구역 제도혁신방안.
  2. 권용우.이창수.변병설.이재준, 2006, 개발제한구역의 환경보전을 위한 토지매입 기준에 관한 연구, 국토계획, 4(2), 79-92.
  3. 권용우, 2004, 그린벨트 해제 이후의 국토관리 정책, 지리학연구, 38(3), 241-258.
  4. 김재익.여창환, 2008, 도시성장예측모형을 활용한 개발제한구역의 효과측정, 국토계획, 43(3), 211-223.
  5. 김재익.여창환.박선형, 2007, 개발제한구역의 개발가능지 분석과 도시성장관리에 대한 시사점, 국토계획, 42(3), 63-75.
  6. 김태경, 2007, 개발제한구역 내 국민임대주택단지의 공간적 파급효과 예측에 관한 연구, 국토계획, 42(4), 25-37.
  7. 김혜애, 1997, 그린벨트 문제의 새로운 해법, 환경과생명 14, 160-169.
  8. 김희주.오규식.이동근, 2011, 공간자기상관분석을 통한 시계열적 경관구조의 변화 분석, 환경복원녹화, 14(3), 1-14.
  9. 노태욱.김제국.박문호.박미호, 2003, 개발제한구역 조정에 따른 녹지관리체계의 개선, 도시정보, 254, 3-14.
  10. 박상규.김창석, 2009, 개발제한구역 해제가 토지이용변화에 미치는 영향: 남양주시 사례를 중심으로, 국토연구, 61, 61-80.
  11. 변병설, 2000, 개발제한구역의 친환경적 관리방안, 환경친화적 토지이용체계 구축방안 연구, 환경부.
  12. 유성용, 2006, 개발제한구역 내 국민임대주택단지의 합리적 개발방안, 한국주거학회논문집, 17(1), 77-84.
  13. 이동근.김명수.구본학.김경훈.김동성.나정화.윤소원.이명우.전성우.정흥락.조경두.제종길.홍선기. 2005. 경관생태학. 보문당.
  14. 이동근.송원경.전성우, 2008, 경관투과성 및 최소비용경로 분석을 통한 수도권 지역의 광역생태축 구축 연구, 환경복원녹화, 11(3), 94-106.
  15. 이상헌.오규식, 2010, 셀룰라 오토마타를 이용한 개발제한구역의 효과, 국토계획, 45(3), 193-208.
  16. 이성호.하영호, 2000, 개발제한구역 제도개선에 따른 지가변화에 관한 연구, 도시연구, 9, 47-58.
  17. 이양주.옥진아, 2008, 광역녹지축 측면에서 바라본 그린벨트 구역의 실효성, 경기개발연구원.
  18. 이외희, 2009, 개발제한구역의 공원화 전략, 경기개발연구원.
  19. 이외희.봉인식.이지은, 2008, 개발제한구역 제도개선 법제화방안, 경기개발연구원.
  20. 이재준.권용우, 2002, 수도권 개발제한구역 해제 지역의 친환경적인 주택단지 건설의 방향, 지리학연구, 36(2), 89-100.
  21. 최대식, 2008, 도시개발 시뮬레이션 모형을 이용한 수도권 배가제한구역의 시가지확산 억제효과 평가, 국토계획, 43(41), 61-75.
  22. 환경부, 2004, 도시지역의 자연환경성 확보방안 연구.
  23. 환경부, 2008, 광역생태축 구축을 위한 연구.
  24. 황영우.이광국.김주석, 2001, 개발제한구역의 생태적 관리에 관한 연구, 부산발전연구원.
  25. Adriaensen, F., J.P. Chardon, G. De Blust, E. Swinnen, S. Villalba, H. Gulinck, and E. Matthysen, 2003, The application of least-cost modelling as a functional landscape model, Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00242-6
  26. Cook, E.A., 2002, Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks, Landscape and Urban Planning, 58, 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00226-2
  27. Forman, R.T.T., and Godron, M., 1986, Lanscape Ecology, New York, USA:John wiley & Sonns, Inc..
  28. Forman, R.T.T, 1995, Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscape and Regions. Cambridge University Press, New York Inc.
  29. Knaapen, J.P., M. Scheff, B. Harins, 1992, Estimating habitat isolation in landscape Planning, Land Urban Plan, 23, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(92)90060-D
  30. Schonewald-Cox, C.M., 1983, Guidelines to Management: A Beginning Attempt. In Rechard B. Primack. 1993, Essentials of Conservation Biology, Sunderland, Messachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
  31. Singelton, P. H., W.L. Gaines, and J.F. Lehmkuhl, 2002, Landscape Permeability for Large Carnivores in Washington; A Geographic Information System Weighted-Distance and Least-Cost Corridor Assessment. United States Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
  32. Taylor, J., C. Paine, and J. FitzGibbon, 1995, From Greenbelt to Greenways: Four Canadian Cases Studies, Landscape and Urban Planning, 33, 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)02013-6
  33. Turner, M. G., R. H. Gardner and R. V. O'nell. 2001. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice. Springer Science Business Media, Inc.
  34. 법제처 홈페이지 http://www.moleg.go.kr