한국비블리아학회지 (Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science)

한국비블리아학회 (Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

이용자정의형 적합성 기준을 토대로 한 웹검색엔진 인터페이스 평가

Appraising the Interface Features of Web Search Engines Based on User-defined Relevance Criteria

  • 투고 : 2011.02.18
  • 심사 : 2011.03.11
  • 발행 : 2011.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이용자 정의형 적합성 연구가 적합성의 유형 및 기준 식별에 큰 진전을 이룬 반면, 그 결과를 실제 시스템 디자인에 적용시키는데는 큰 발전이 없었다. 이러한 전제하에 본 연구는 식별된 적합성기준이 주요 웹검색엔진의 인터페이스 기능에 어느정도 접목되었는지를 조사하고 무엇이 더 이루어져야 하는지를 제안하였다. 시스템 기능에 접근하기전에 본 연구에서는 적합성연구와 정보학 및 HCI에서 이와 유사한 이용자중심 연구를 비교하여 제시하였다. 인터페이스기능을 지원하기위한 제안점은 (1) 인터페이스 디자인의 추가적인 개인화, (2) 웹 컨텐츠를 위한 저자제공 메타 태그, 그리고 (3) 링크구조에 입각한 비주제적 표현의 확장 등이다.

Although research has shown a significant amount of work identifying various dimensions of relevance along with exhaustive lists of relevance criteria, there seem to have been less effort to apply the findings to improve actual systems design. Based on this assumption, this paper investigates to what extent those relevance criteria have been incorporated into the interface features of major commercial Web search engines, suggesting what can/should be done more. Before stepping into the actual system features, this paper compares recent relevance research in Information Science with other human factor studies both in Information Science and its neighboring discipline (HCI), as an attempt to identify studies that are conceptually similar to the relevance research, but not named as such way. Similarities and differences between these studies are presented. Recommendations suggested to support applicable interface features include: 1) further personalization of interface designs; 2) author-supplied meta tags for the Web contents; and 3) extensions of beyond-topical representations based on link structure.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Barry, C. 1994. User-defined relevance criteria: an exploratory study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3): 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199404)45:3<149::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-J
  2. Belkin, N. 1993. Interaction with texts: Information retrieval as information-seeking behavior. In: Information retrieval, 10, Von der Modelierung zur Anwerdung. Konstanz, Germany: Universitaetsverlag. 55-66.
  3. Booth, P. 1989. An Introduction to Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
  4. Brin, S. & Page, L. 1998. The Anatomy of a largeschale hypertextual Web search engine. [cited 2010.5.5]. .
  5. Cool, C., Belkin, N.J., Frieder, O. & Kantor, P.B. 1993. Characteristics of texts affecting relevance judgements. In M.E. Williams (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th National Online Meeting, (pp. 77-84). Medford, NJ: Learned Information, Inc.
  6. Cuadra, C. & Katter, R. 1967. Opening the black box of "Relevance." Journal of Documentation, 23(4): 291-303. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026436
  7. Dervin, B. & Nilan, M. 1986. Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21: 3-33.
  8. Fidel, R. 1994. User-centered indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(8): 572-576. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199409)45:8<572::AID-ASI11>3.0.CO;2-X
  9. Froehlich, T.J. 1994. Relevance reconsidered-Towards an agenda for the 21st century: Introduction to special topic issue on relevance research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3): 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199404)45:3<124::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-8
  10. Harter, S. 1992. Psychological Relevance and Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9): 602-615. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199210)43:9<602::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-Q
  11. Ingwersen, P. 1992. Information retrieval interaction. London: Taylor Graham.
  12. Hix, D. & Hartoson, H. 1993. Developing user interfaces: Ensuring usability thorough produce & process. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  13. Lin, S. & Belkin, N. 2000. Modeling multiple information seeking episodes. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 37: 133-147.
  14. Marchionini, G. 1995. Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Marchionini, G. & Komlodi, A. 1998. Design of interfaces for information seeking. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 33: 89-130.
  16. Marchionini, G., Plaisant, C. & Komlodi, A. 1998. Interfaces and tools for the Library of Congress National Digital Library Program. Information Processing & Management, 34(5): 535-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(98)00020-X
  17. Nielsen, J. 1993. Usability Engineering. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
  18. Park, T. 1993. The nature of relevance in information retrieval: an empirical study. Library Quarterly, 63 (3): 318-351. https://doi.org/10.1086/602592
  19. Park, H. 1997. Relevance of science information: origins and dimensions of relevance and their implications to information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 33(3): 339-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(96)00072-6
  20. Rieh, S.Y. 2000. Information Quality and cognitive authority in the World Wide Web. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Jersey.
  21. Saracevic, T. 1996a. Modeling interaction in information retrieval (IR): a review and proposal. Proceedings of the 59th ASIS Annual Meeting, 33: 3-9.
  22. Saracevic, T. 1996b. RELEVANCE reconsidered. In P. Ingwersen & N.O. Pors (eds.), Information Science: Integration in Perspectives. 2nd International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information science (CoLIS2). (pp. 201-218). Copenhagen, Denmark: The Royal School of Librarianship.
  23. Saracevic, T. 1997. The stratified model of information retrieval interaction: extension and applications. Proceedings of the 60th ASIS Annual Meeting, 34: 313-327.
  24. Saracevic, T. 1999. Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12): 1051-1063. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:12<1051::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Z
  25. Savolainen, R., & Kari, J. (2005). User-defined relevance criteria in web searching. Journal of Documentation, 62: 685-707.
  26. Schamber, L. 1991. User's criteria for evaluation in multimedia information seeking and use situations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
  27. Schamber, L. 1994. Relevance and information behavior. Annual Reviews of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 29: 3-48.
  28. Schamber, L., Eisenberg, M.B., & Nilan, M.S. 1990. A re-examination of relevance: toward a dynamic, situational definition. Information Processing & Management, 26(6): 755-776. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(90)90050-C
  29. Shackel, B. 1997. Human-Computer Interaction - Whence and Whither? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(11): 970-986. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199711)48:11<970::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Z
  30. Shneiderman, B. 1980. Software psychology: Human factors in computer and information systems. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Winthrop Publishers, Inc.
  31. Shneiderman, B. 1998. Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction (3rd ed.). Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
  32. Shneiderman, B., Byrd, D. and Croft, B. 1997. Clarifying search: a user-interface framework for text searches. D-Lib Magazine, January. [cited 2010.5.15]. .
  33. Soergel, D. 1985. Organizing Information: Principles of database and retrieval systems. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  34. Sullivan, D. 2010, December 20. Search engine watch. . [cited 2011.1.15]. Available: .
  35. Taylor, A., Zhang, X. & Amadio, W. J. 2009. Examination of Relevance Criteria Choices and the Information Search Process. Journal of Documentation, 65(5): 719-744. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410910983083
  36. Wang, P. & Soergel D. 1998. A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study 1. Document selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(2): 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199802)49:2<115::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-T
  37. Weinberg, B. H. 1988. Why indexing fails the researcher. The Indexer, 16(1): 3-6.