A Game Theoretic Study of Energy Efficient Cooperative Wireless Networks

  • Brown, Donald Richard III (Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute) ;
  • Fazel, Fatemeh (Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute)
  • Received : 2010.02.05
  • Accepted : 2010.03.31
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

In wireless networks, it is well-known that intermediate nodes can be used as cooperative relays to reduce the transmission energy required to reliably deliver a message to an intended destination. When the network is under a central authority, energy allocations and cooperative pairings can be assigned to optimize the overall energy efficiency of the network. In networks with autonomous selfish nodes, however, nodes may not be willing to expend energy to relay messages for others. This problem has been previously addressed through the development of extrinsic incentive mechanisms, e.g., virtual currency, or the insertion of altruistic nodes in the network to enforce cooperative behavior. This paper considers the problem of how selfish nodes can decide on an efficient energy allocation and endogenously form cooperative partnerships in wireless networks without extrinsic incentive mechanisms or altruistic nodes. Using tools from both cooperative and non-cooperative game theory, the three main contributions of this paper are (i) the development of Pareto-efficient cooperative energy allocations that can be agreed upon by selfish nodes, based on axiomatic bargaining techniques, (ii) the development of necessary and sufficient conditions under which "natural" cooperation is possible in systems with fading and non-fading channels without extrinsic incentive mechanisms or altruistic nodes, and (iii) the development of techniques to endogenously form cooperative partnerships without central control. Numerical results with orthogonal amplify-and-forward cooperation are also provided to quantify the energy efficiency of a wireless network with sources selfishly allocating transmission/relaying energy and endogenously forming cooperative partnerships with respect to a network with centrally optimized energy allocations and pairing assignments.

Keywords

References

  1. Q. Zhao and L. Tong, "Energy efficiency of large-scale wireless networks: Pro-active vs. reactive networking," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1100-1112, May 2005.
  2. S. Marti, T. J. Giuli, K. Lai, and M. Baker, "Mitigating routing misbehavior in mobile ad hoc networks," in Proc. ACM/IEEE Mobicom, 2000, pp. 255-265.
  3. J. Yang, A. G. Klein, and D. Brown III, "Cooperation without extrinsic incentive mechanisms in wireless networks with selfish nodes," to be appeared in IEEE Signal Process. Mag., 2009.
  4. J.-P. Hubaux, T. Gross, J.-Y. Le Boudec, and M. Vetterli, "Towards selforganized mobile ad hoc networks: The terminodes project," IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 118-124. Jan. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1109/35.894385
  5. L. Blazevic, L. Buttyan, S. Capkun, S. Giordano, J.-P. Hubaux, and J.-Y. L. Boudec, "Self organization in mobile ad hoc networks: The approach of terminodes," IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 166-174, June 2001. https://doi.org/10.1109/35.925685
  6. M. Jakobsson, J.-P. Hubaux, and L. Buttyan, "A micro-payment scheme encouraging collaboration in multi-hop cellular networks," Financial Crypto, 2003.
  7. L. Lai and H. El Gamal, "On cooperation in energy efficient wireless networks: The role of altruistic nodes," IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1868-1878, May 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2008.060568
  8. M. Felegyhazi, J.-P. Hubaux, and L. Buttyan, "Nash equilibria of packet forwarding strategies in wireless ad hoc networks," IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 5, pp. 1044-1049, May. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2006.115
  9. J. Yang and D. R. Brown III, "Energy efficient relaying games in cooperative wireless transmission systems," in Proc. the Forty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals. Systems and Computers, Nov. 2007, pp. 835-839.
  10. J. N. Laneman, D. N. C. Tse, and G. W. Wornell, "Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 3062-3080, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2004.838089
  11. D. Gale and L. Shapley, "College admissions and the stability of marriage," The American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 9-15, Jan. 1962. https://doi.org/10.2307/2312726
  12. J. Yang, D. Gunduz, D.R. Brown III, and E. Erkip, "Resource allocation for cooperative relaying," in Proc. CISS, Princeton, NJ, Mar 2008.
  13. K. Binmore, Fun and Games: A Text on Game Theory. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath, 1992.
  14. E. Kalai and M. Smorodinsky, "Other solutions to Nash's bargaining problem," Econometrica, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 513-518, 1975. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914280
  15. X. Cao, "Preference functions and bargaining solutions," in Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, 1982, pp. 164-171.
  16. R. Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, 1984.
  17. M. Jackson and A. Wolinsky, "A strategic model of social and economic networks," Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 44-74, June 1996. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1996.0108
  18. D. Gusfield and R. W. Irving, The Stable Marriage Problem: Structure and Algorithms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.
  19. Y. Chen, P. Cheng, P. Qiu, and Z. Zhang, "Optimal partner selection strategies in wireless cooperative networks with fixed and variable transmit powers," in Proc IEEE WCNC, Mar. 2007, pp. 4080-4084.
  20. R. Mazumdar, L. G. Mason, and C. Douligeris, "Fairness in network optimal flow control: Optimality of product forms," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 775-782, May 1991. https://doi.org/10.1109/26.87140