A Study on the Interrelationship with Interior space and Furniture - Focused on Peirce's Theory -

실내 공간과 가구의 상호관계성 연구 - 퍼스의 기호학을 중심으로 -

  • 백정민 (국민대학교 디자인대학원 실내설계) ;
  • 허범팔 (국민대학교 조형대학 실내디자인학과)
  • Received : 2011.03.31
  • Accepted : 2011.06.10
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

Interior design has diverse functions and roles according to recent changes in life and cultural style. As the meaning of space varies, the furniture as another element of the space should also be planned and included in the beginning of the project to accomplish its functional role on the finished space and not only be placed. The relationship between Interior space and furniture should be studied and understood at the same realm because they have a complementary relationship. The final destination of design, which is very challenging to accommodate people, the designer needs to approach to the interior space and furniture in a cognitive view. The study of Semiotics views in a knowledgeable and epistemological way every element as a sign and by the relationship of their characters it makes to understand the structure of the signs. Charles Sanders Peirce, a leader of Semiotics in USA, classified the structure of Sign into Representamen, Object and Interpretant to complete the theory which could systematically describe physical characteristic and function of the Sign and its significance in practical use. Peirce stated that all nine types of Sign would be generated if each structure of Sign in combined with three categories of Sign such as Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness. In this study, based on Peirce's nine types of Sign, the interrelationship between space and furniture in interior design was investigated with examples in Living Space, Office Space, and Commercial Space, respectively. In the category of Representamen, which can be classified into Qualisign, Sinsign, and Legisign, it is a feature of Living Space to be expressed in harmonized and stabilized ways. In Office Space vertical/horizontal elements and open expression are differently showed depending on fields. And splendid and interesting expressions are showed in Commercial Space. In the category of Object, which can be classified into Icon, Index, and Symbol, each function of Sign has distinctly been showed as Symbol in Living Space, Index in Office Space, and Icon in Commercial Space, respectively. In the category of Interpretant, which can be classified into Rheme, Dicisign, and Argument, it was found that space image of Living Space is transferred to human being, Office Space regulates human bing, and Commercial Space binds human being with the space. In conclusion the function of the interior space and the furniture could be explained in another way with re-interpretation of interrelationship among interior space elements in the concept of Semiotics. It is expected that interpretation with Semiotics in interior design will grow to new theory of design.

Keywords

References

  1. 기호학연대, 기호학으로 세상읽기, 소명출판, 2002
  2. 김성도, 기호, 리듬, 우주, 인간사랑, 2007
  3. 김치수, 김성도, 박인철, 박일우, 현대기호학의 발전, 서울대학교출판부, 1998
  4. 오인욱, 室內디자인 方法論, 기문당, 2001
  5. 찰스 샌더스 퍼스, 퍼스의 기호 사상, 김성도 역, 민음사, 2006
  6. 마르틴 졸리, 이미지와 기호, 이선형 역, 동문선, 2004
  7. 폴 코블리, 기호학-하룻밤의 지식여행, 조성택, 변진경 역, 김영사, 2002
  8. 로즈메리 킬머, W, 오티 킬머, 인테리어 디자인:기초, 실무이론, 김혜원, 윤혜경, 천진희 역, 교문사, 2007
  9. 신선주, 플래그쉽 스토어의 기호학적 해석의 관한 연구, 건국대 석사논문, 2008
  10. 진경미, 실내공간과 가구의 상호적 특성에 관한 연구, 국민대 석사논문, 2008
  11. 송진원, 사회적 디자인의 표현특성에 관한 연구, 홍익대 석사논문, 2010
  12. 박경애, 퍼어스 기호학에 의한 한국전통공간디자인의 삼원론적 분석에 관한 연구, 한국실내디자인학회논문집, 2005
  13. 함보아, Surrealism 표현특성과 기호학적 적용방법을 통한 공간분석 연구, 한국실내디자인학회논문집, 2009