한국발생생물학회지:발생과생식 (Development and Reproduction)

  • 제15권1호
  • /
  • Pages.9-15
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 2465-9525(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2465-9541(eISSN)
한국발생생물학회 (The Korean Society of Developmental Biology)
권호 표지

Dynamic Study of Tetrahymena pyriformis Growth and Reproduction in Aerobic and Anaerobic Conditions

  • Yoo, Eun-Sun (Dept. of Oriental Medicine Industry, College of Environmental and Natural Sciences, Honam University)
  • 투고 : 2010.12.28
  • 심사 : 2011.02.28
  • 발행 : 2011.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The population growth and reproduction of Tetrahymena pyriformis were studied under shaken (aerobic) and unshaken (anaerobic) conditions by applying the growth models, exponential and logistic growth models and the population growth of Tetrahymena was showed the logistic growth model under both, shaken and unshaken conditions and also, the more oxygenated samples had greater population size (N) and three times faster growth rate (r) than less oxygenated samples during incubation periods.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Begon M, Townsend CR, Harper JL (2006) Ecology. 4th Ed. Wiley-Blockwell.
  2. Bruns PJ, Cassidy-Hanley D (2000) Biolistic transformation of macro- and micronuclei. Meth Cell Biol 62:501-512.
  3. Campbell NA, Reece JB (2007) Biology. 8th Ed. Pearson Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco.
  4. Cole ES, Virtue MA, Stuart KR (2001) Development in electrofused conjugants of Tetrahymena thermophila. J Eukar Microb 48:266-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2001.tb00314.x
  5. Collins K, Gorovsky MA (2005) Tetrahymena thermophila. Curr Biol 15:R317-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.04.039
  6. Dias N (2003) Morphological and physiological changes in Tetrahymena pyriformis for the in vitro cytotoxicity assessment of Triton X-100. Toxicology in Vitro 17:357-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-2333(03)00023-7
  7. Driscoll C, Hufnagel LA (1999) Affinity-purification of concanavalin A-binding ciliary glycoconjugates of starved and feeding Tetrahymena thermophila. J Euk Microbiol 46:142-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb04597.x
  8. Elliott AM (1959) Biology of Tetrahymena. Annu Rev Microbiol 13:79-96. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.13.100159.000455
  9. Elliott AM, Hayes RE (1953) Mating types in Tetrahymena. Biol Bull 105:269-284. https://doi.org/10.2307/1538642
  10. Frankel J, Klahn JE, Stefaniak JE, Williams NE (2007) Principles of Biology. 8th Ed. Pearson Custom Publishing.
  11. Janetopoulos C, Cole E, Smothers JF (1999) The conjusome: A novel structure in Tetrahymena found only during sexual reorganization. J Cell Sci 112:1003-1111.
  12. Kim K, Son M, Peterson JB (2002) $Ca^{2+}$-binding proteins of cilia and infraciliary lattice of Paramecium tetraurelia: Their phosphorylation by purified endogenous $Ca^{2+}$-dependent protein kinases. J Cell Sci 115:1973-1984.
  13. Kiersnowska M, Kaczanowski A, Morga J (2000) Macronuclear development in conjugates of Tetrahymena thermophila, which were artificially separated at meiotic prophase. J Euk Microbiol 47:139-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2000.tb00023.x
  14. Lee JJ, Leedale GF, Bradbury PC (2000) An Illustrated Guide to the Protozoa: Organisms Traditionally Referred to as Protozoa, or Newly Discovered Groups. 2nd ed. Society of Protozoologists. Lawrence Inc.
  15. Mochizuki K, Fine NA, Fujisawa T (2002) Analysis of a piwi-related gene implicates small RNAs in genome rearrangement in Tetrahymena. Cell 110:689-699. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00909-1
  16. Mochizuki K, Gorovsky MA (2004) Conjugation-specific small RNAs in Tetrahymena have predicted properties of scan (scn) RNAs involved in genome rearrangement. Genes Dev 18:2068-2073. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1219904
  17. Mochizuki K, Gorovsky MA (2005) A Dicer-like protein in Tetrahymena has distinct functions in genome rearrangement, chromosome segregation, and meiotic prophase. Genes Dev 19:77-89. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1265105
  18. Niculescu SP (2000) Modeling the toxicity of chemicals to Tetrahymena pyriformis using molecular fragment descriptors and probabilistic neural networks. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 39:289-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002440010107
  19. Numata O, Hanyu K, Takeda T, Watanabe Y (2000) Tetrahymena calcium-binding proteins, TCBP-25 and TCBP-23. Meth Cell Biol 62:455-465.
  20. Odum EP (1997) Ecology: A Bridge between Science and Society. Sinauer Associates Inc. Publishers, Massachusetts.
  21. Virtue MA, Cole ES (1999) A cytogenetic study of development in mechanically disrupted pairs of Tetrahymena thermophila. J Euk Microbiol 46:597-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb05135.x
  22. Ward CJ, Codd GA (1999) Comparative toxicity for four microcystins of different hydrophobicities to the protozoan, Tetrahymena pyriformis. J Appl Microbiol 86:874-882. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00771.x
  23. Williams NE (2004) The epiplasm gene EPC1 influences cell shape and cortical pattern in Tetrahymena thermophila. J Eukar Microbiol 51:201-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2004.tb00546.x