Plant Biotechnology Reports

The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology (한국식물생명공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Differential responses of two rice varieties to salt stress

  • Ghosh, N. (Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology Research Unit, Department of Botany, University of Kalyani) ;
  • Adak, M.K. (Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology Research Unit, Department of Botany, University of Kalyani) ;
  • Ghosh, P.D. (Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology Research Unit, Department of Botany, University of Kalyani) ;
  • Gupta, S. (Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology Research Unit, Department of Botany, University of Kalyani) ;
  • Sen Gupta, D.N. (Department of Botany, Bose Institute) ;
  • Mandal, C. (Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology Research Unit, Department of Botany, University of Kalyani)
  • Received : 2010.06.22
  • Accepted : 2010.12.11
  • Published : 2011.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Two rice varieties, viz. Nonabokra and Pokkali, have been evaluated for their responses to salinity in terms of some physiological and biochemical attributes. During the exposure to salinity (200 mM concentration of sodium chloride for 24, 48, and 72 h), a significant increase in sodium was recorded which was also concomitant with the changes of other metabolic profiles like proline, phenol, polyamine, etc. The protein oxidation was significantly increased and also varied between the two cultivars. The changes in activities of anti-oxidative enzymes under stress were significantly different to the control. The detrimental effects of salinity were also evident in terms of lipid peroxidation, chlorophyll content, protein profiles, and generation of free radicals; and these were more pronounced in Pokkali than in Nonabokra. The assessment and analysis of these physiological characters under salinity could unravel the mechanism of salt responses revealed in this present study and thus might be useful for selection of tolerant plant types under the above conditions of salinity.

Keywords

References

  1. Alia, Mohanty P, Matysik J (2001) Effect of proline on the production of singlet oxygen. Amino Acids 21:195-200 https://doi.org/10.1007/s007260170026
  2. Ammar WB, Nouairi I, Zarrouk M, Ghorbel MH, Jemal F (2008) Antioxidative response to cadmium in roots and leaves of tomato plants. Biol Plant 52:727-731 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-008-0140-2
  3. Arnon D (1949) Copper enzyme in isolated chloroplast and poly phenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1-7 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1
  4. Ashraf MY, Akhtar K, Sarwar G, Ashraf M (2005) Role of rooting system in salt tolerant potential in different Guar accessions. Agron Sustain Dev 25:243-249 https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2005019
  5. Bascola PR, Menossi M, Jorge RA (2003) Aluminum-induced oxidative stress in plants. Photochemistry 62:181-189 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00491-0
  6. Basu S, Roychowdhury A, Saha P, Sengupta DN (2009) Differential antioxidative responses of indica rice cultivars to drought stress. Plant Growth Regul 10:219-225
  7. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205-207 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
  8. Bhattacharya S (2005) Reactive oxidative species and oxidative stress in plants: roles in stress, senescence and signal transduction in plants. Curr Sci 89:1113-1121
  9. Botella MA, De Amor F, Amoros A, Serrano M, Marlinez V, Cerda A (2000) Polyamines, ethylene and other physico-chemical parameters in tomato fruits as affected by salinity. Plant Physiol 109:428-434 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.100409.x
  10. Bradford MM (1976) Rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of micro gram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-binding dye. Ann Biochem 72:248-254 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
  11. Chao YJ, Jae GS, Chang HS, Sheon A, Hwang, Young ML, Se Y, Jeong Y, Chung B (2008) Integrated nutrient management for environmental friendly rice production affected by salt deposition Saemangeum reclaimed land of South Korea. Paddy Water Environ 6:263-273 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-008-0124-z
  12. Cheeseman JM (2006) Hydrogen peroxide and plant stress: a challenging relationship. Plant Stress 1:4-11
  13. Chutipaijit S, Cha Um S, Sompornpailin K (2009) Differential accumulation of proline and flavonoids in indica rice varieties against salinity. Pak J Bot 41:2496-2506
  14. Ding C, Shi G, Xu X, Yang H, Xu Y (2010) Effects of exogenous spermidine on polyamine metabolism in water hyacinth leaves under mercury stress. Plant Growth Regul 60:61-67 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-009-9419-3
  15. Dionisio-Sese ML, Tobita S (1998) Antioxidant response of rice seedlings to salinity stress. Plant Sci 135:1-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00025-9
  16. Gama PBS, Inanana S, Tanaka K, Nakazawa R (2007) Physiological response of common bean seedlings to salinity stress. Afr J Biotechnol 6:79-88
  17. Gill PK, Sharma AD, Singh P, Bhullar SS (2003) Changes in germination, growth and soluble sugar contents of Sorghum bicolour (L.) Moench seeds under abiotic stress. Plant Growth Regul 40:157-162 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024252222376
  18. Heath RL, Packer L (1968) Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys 125:189-198 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1
  19. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif Agric Stn Circ 347:1-32
  20. Hong TD, Ellis RH(2004) The survival and germinating orthodox seeds after desiccation and hermetic storage. J Exp Bot 43:239-247
  21. Hu Y, Ge Y, Zang C, Zu T, Cheng W (2009) Cd toxicity and translocation in rice seedlings are reduced by hydrogen peroxide treatments. Plant Growth Regul 5:51-61
  22. Jayaprakasha GK, Singh RP, Sakariah KK (2001) Antioxidant activity of grape seed extract on peroxidation models in vitro. Food Chem 73:285-290 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00298-3
  23. Jung S (2004) Variation in antioxidation metabolism of young and mature leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana subjected to drought. Plant Sci 166:459-466 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.012
  24. Kumaran A, Karunakaran RJ (2006) Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of an aqueous extract of Coleus aromaticus. Food Chem 97:109-114 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.03.032
  25. Lee DH, Kim YS, Lee CB (2001) The inductive response of the antioxidant enzymes by salt stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Plant Physiol 158:737-745 https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00174
  26. Lejocka J, Kluk A (2005) Effect of salt and osmotic stress on changes in polyamine content and argentine decarboxylase activity in Lupinus luteus seedlings. Plant Physiol 162:662-668 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.08.009
  27. Liu J, Kitshiba H, Wang S, Ban Y, Moriguchi T (2007) Polyamines and their ability to provide environmental stress tolerance to plants. Plant Biotechnol 24:117-126 https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.24.117
  28. Liu JH, Inove H, Moriguchi T (2008) Salt stress mediated changes in free polyamine titers and expression of genes responsible for polyamine biosynthesis of apple in in vitro shoots. Environ Exp Bot 62:28-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.07.002
  29. Loreto F, Velikova V (2001) Isoprene produced by leaves protects the photosynthetic apparatus against ozone damage, quenches ozone products, and reduces lipid peroxidation of cellular membranes. Plant Physiol 127:1781-1787 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.010497
  30. Mittler R (2002) Oxidative stress, antioxidant and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 7:405-410 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02312-9
  31. Mohsen S, Ammar ASM (2009) Total phenolic contents and antioxidant activity in maize tassel extract. Food Chem 112:595-598 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.06.014
  32. Muthukumarasamy M, Gupta SD, Pannerselvam R (2000) Enhance of peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase and super oxide dismutase activities by triadimefon in NaCl stressed Raphanus sativus (L.). Biol Plant 43:317-320 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002741302485
  33. Parveiz A, Satyawati S (2008) Salt stress and phyto-biochemical responses in plants. Plant Soil 54:89-99
  34. Pearse I, Heath KD, Cheeeseman JM (2005) A partial characterization of peroxidase in Rhizophora mangle. Plant Cell Environ 28:612-622 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01307.x
  35. Peng S, Cassman KG, Virmani SS, Sheehy J, Khush GS (1999) Yield potential trends of tropical rice since the release of IR8 and the challenge of increasing rice yield potential. Crop Sci 39:1552-1559 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961552x
  36. Reddy AR, Chaiytanya KV, Vivekanandan M (2004) Drought induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J Plant Physiol 161:1189-1202 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.01.013
  37. Roy Choudhury A, Basu S (2008) Over expression of an abiotic stress responsive plant protein in bacteria E. coli. Afr J Plant Biotechnol 7:3231-3234
  38. Roy P, Niyogi K, Sengupta DN, Ghosh B (2005) Spermidine treatment to rice seedlings recovers the salinity stress induced damage of plasma membrane and PM-ATPase in salt tolerant and sensitive cultivars. Plant Sci 168:583-589 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.08.014
  39. Roychowdhury A, Roy C, Sengupta DN (2007) Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing the heterologous lea gene Rab 16a from rice during high salt and water deficit display enhanced tolerance to salinity stress. Plant Cell Rep 26:1839-1859 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-007-0371-2
  40. Sagi M, Fluhr R (2006) Production of reactive oxygen species by plants NADPH oxidase. Plant Physiol 14:336-340
  41. Sairam RK, Tyagi A (2004) Physiology and molecular biology in salinity tolerance in plants. Curr Sci 86:407-420
  42. Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor
  43. Tang W, Newton RJ (2005) Polyamine reduces salt induced oxidative damage by increasing the activity of antioxidant enzyme and decreasing lipid peroxidation. Plant Growth Regul 46:31-43 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-005-6395-0
  44. Tonon G, Kevers C, Faibre Rampant P, Graziani M, Czaspar T (2004) Effects of NaCl stress on proline and free polyamine levels in emerging Fraxinus angustifolia callus. Plant Physiol 161:701-708 https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-01096
  45. Wang W, Kin Y-H, Haeng, Lee S, Deng W-P, Sookwak S (2009) Differential antioxidation activities in two alfa cultivars under chilling stress. Plant Biotechnol Rep 3:301-307 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-009-0102-y
  46. Yokoi S, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM (2002) Salt stress tolerance of plants. JIRCAS working report 2002, pp 25-33
  47. Zeid IM, Shedeed ZA (2006) Alterations in nitrogen metabolites after putrescine treatment in alfalfa under drought stress. Pak J Biol Sci 10:1513-1518
  48. Zhao H, Yang Z (2008) Exogenous polyamines alleviate the lipid peroxidation induced by cadmium chloride stress in Malus hupehensis Rehd. Sci Hortic 116:442-447 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.02.017
  49. Zhu JK (2001) Plant salt tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 6:66-71

Cited by

  1. Nitric oxide modulates antioxidant defense and the methylglyoxal detoxification system and reduces salinity-induced damage of wheat seedlings vol.5, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-011-0189-9
  2. Transcriptional regulations of the genes of starch metabolism and physiological changes in response to salt stress rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings vol.18, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-012-0114-x
  3. Metabolomics - Useful Tool for Study of Plant Responses to Abiotic Stresses vol.19, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2478/v10216-011-0012-0
  4. Responses of the maize plant to chromium stress with reference to antioxidation activity vol.24, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-04202012000300007
  5. Cadmium Accumulation in <i>Marsilea minuta</i> Linn. and Its Antioxidative Responses vol.4, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.42a048
  6. Physiological basis of salt stress tolerance in rice expressing the antiapoptotic gene SfIAP vol.41, pp.10, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1071/fp13308
  7. Effects of putrescine on oxidative stress induced by hydrogen peroxide in Salvinia natans L. vol.9, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2013.871076
  8. Pré-condicionamento in vitro de plantas de cana-de-açúcar (Saccharum spp.) para tolerância ao estresse salino vol.18, pp.suppl, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v18nsupps27-s33
  9. Exogenous Proline and Glycine Betaine Mediated Upregulation of Antioxidant Defense and Glyoxalase Systems Provides Better Protection against Salt-Induced Oxidative Stress in Two Rice ( Oryza sativa L vol.2014, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/757219
  10. Development of salinity tolerance in rice by constitutive-overexpression of genes involved in the regulation of programmed cell death vol.6, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00175
  11. Assessment of Some Biomarkers under Submergence Stress in Some Rice Cultivars Varying in Responses vol.6, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2015.61010
  12. Changes in Physiological Responses of Hygrophila schulli Under Cadmium Toxicity vol.4, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-015-0155-9
  13. Improvement of Salinity Stress Tolerance in Rice: Challenges and Opportunities vol.6, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy6040054
  14. Analysis of miRNA-seq combined with gene expression profile reveals the complexity of salinity stress response in Oryza sativa vol.39, pp.12, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-017-2570-y
  15. Biochemical, physiological and molecular evaluation of rice cultivars differing in salt tolerance at the seedling stage vol.23, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-017-0440-0
  16. Two-Step Salt Stress Acclimatization Confers Marked Salt Tolerance Improvement in Four Rice Genotypes Differing in Salt Tolerance vol.42, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2335-8
  17. Exogenous silicon alters ascorbate-glutathione cycle in two salt-stressed indica rice cultivars (MTU 1010 and Nonabokra) vol.25, pp.26, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2659-x
  18. Selenium Affects Physiological Responses of Phaseolus vulgaris in Response to Salt Level vol.24, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2017.1413030
  19. The responses of cucumber plants subjected to different salinity or fertilizer concentrations and reproductive success of Tetranychus urticae mites on these plants vol.75, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-018-0246-y
  20. A Review on Plant Responses to Soil Salinity and Amelioration Strategies vol.9, pp.11, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2019.911013
  21. Involvement of ethylene signaling in zinc oxide nanoparticle-mediated biochemical changes inArabidopsis thalianaleaves vol.6, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1039/c8en00971f
  22. Moderation of physiological responses in rice plants with Azolla under 2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid stress vol.46, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-018-4443-x
  23. Joint effects of Si and mycorrhiza on the antioxidant metabolism of two pigeonpea genotypes under As (III) and (V) stress vol.26, pp.8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04256-5
  24. Mitigation mechanism of ozone-induced reduction in net photosynthesis of Bangladeshi wheat under soil salinity stress vol.57, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2019.115
  25. Discerning of Rice Landraces (Oryza sativa L.) for Morpho-physiological, Antioxidant Enzyme Activity, and Molecular Markers’ Responses to Induced Salt Stress at the Seedling Stage vol.39, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-09962-5
  26. Optimizing Seedling Number and Hill Spacing: A Way Forward to Harness Productivity Potential of Salt-Tolerant Rice Cultivars in Salt-Affected Soils vol.9, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-019-00405-x
  27. Marker aided introgression of ‘ Saltol’ , a major QTL for seedling stage salinity tolerance into an elite Basmati rice variety ‘Pusa Basmati 1509’ vol.10, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70664-0