한국항공운항학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics)

  • 제19권1호
  • /
  • Pages.49-57
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1225-9705(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-1791(eISSN)
한국항공운항학회 (The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

우리나라 대형항공사와 저가항공사의 지각위험에 대한 비교분석

The Comparative Analysis of Perceived Risks in South Korean Low Cost Carriers and Full Service Carriers

  • 최휴종 (경인여자대학 항공관광과)
  • 투고 : 2010.12.02
  • 심사 : 2011.03.15
  • 발행 : 2011.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 한국항공시장의 지각위험에 대한 실증적 연구이다. 김포국제공항 및 인천국제공항에서 수집한 316부의 설문지를 다중회귀분석, 분산분석, 상관분석, 및 T-test 기법을 동원하여 분석하였다. 연구결과, 대형항공사와 저비용항공사 승객간의 지각위험에는 차이가 있었으며 대형항공사 승객은 재무적 위험에 민감한 반면, 저비용항공사의 승객은 기종 및 물리적 위험에 민감하였다. 따라서 대형항공사에서는 섬세한 서비스 제공이 더욱 요구되며, 저비용항공사가 신항공기를 사용하는 것이 저비용항공사의 안전성 인식 제고에 효과적이라 사료된다.

This paper concentrate on the passengers' perception of risks by analyzing data gathered through a field survey in the South Korean air market. Twenty two Koreans were killed in the accident of PMT Air in the Kingdom of Cambodia on June 25th 2007 and This has caused customers to be more concerned about the safety of airline. Three hundred forty-two samples were collected from field survey at Kimpo International Airport in Seoul and Jeju International Airport on Jeju island and the findings are based on 316 questionnaires. The multiple regression analysis, Analysis of variance (ANOVA), Correlation analysis, T-test were carried out to examine the effect, relationship and difference of data set. The results show that there are differences between passengers' perceived risks in LCC's and those in FSC's. Passengers of LCC's took serious consideration of the type of fleet and feeling physical risk, whereas those of FSC's only took consideration of financial risk.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bahr, N., System Safety Engineering and Risk Assessment: A Practical Approach. Taylor and Francis, London, 1997.
  2. Bauer, R.A consumer behavior as risk taking, In Robert S. Handok, Dynamic marketing for a changing world, Chicago: American Marketing Association, 1960.
  3. Cronbach, J. L., Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of the tests. Psychometrika 16, 1951, pp. 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  4. Evangelho, F., Huse, C., Linfares, A., Market entry of a low cost airline and impacts on the Brazilian business travelers. Journal of Air Transport Management 11, 2005, pp.99-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2004.09.005
  5. Fourie, C., Lubbe, B., Determinants of selection of full-service airlines and low-cost carriers-A note on business travelers in South Africa, Journal of Air Transport Management 12, 2006, pp.98-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2005.11.008
  6. Lee,D., Kim., Comparative Analysis of Image of International Carriers flying to Korea, Journal of Tourism Sciences of Korea 25-4, 2002, pp.227-251.
  7. Jacoby, J., Kaplan, L., The components of perceived risk. In: Third AnnualConference of the Association for Consumer Reasearch, Association for Consumer Research, Chicago, 1972, pp. 382-393.
  8. Janic, M., An assessment of risk and safety in civil aviation. Journal of Air Transport Management 6, 2000, pp.43-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6997(99)00021-6
  9. Kaplan, L.B., Szybillo, G.J., Jacoby, J., Components of perceieved risk in product purchase: a cross-validation. Journal of Applied Psychology 59, 1974, pp.287-291. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036657
  10. Mitchell, V. W., Defining and Measuring Perceived Risk. Academy of Marketing Conference, Academy of Marketing Association, Sheffield, 1998.
  11. Mason, K. J., Marketing low-cost airline service to business travellers, Journal of Air Transport Management 7, 2001, pp.103-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6997(00)00036-3
  12. O'Connell, J.F., Williams, G., Passengers' perceptions of low cost airlines and full service carriers: A case study involving Ryanair, Aer Lingus, Air Asia and Malaysia Airlines, Journal of Air Transport Management 11, 2005, pp.259-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2005.01.007
  13. Park, J., Robertson, R., Wu, C., The effect of airline service quality on passengers' behavioural intentions: a Korean case study. Journal of Air Transport Management 10, 2004, pp. 435-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2004.06.001
  14. Park, J., Shin, D., A study On Influence Upon Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty of Perception of Attribute in the Airlines, Journal of Tourism Sciences of korea 14, 1999, pp. 287-306.
  15. Peter, J. P., Ryan, M., An investigation of perceived risk at the brand level. Journal of marketing Research 13, 1976, pp.184-188. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150856
  16. Philipp E. Boksberger, Thomas Bieger, Christian Laesser, Multidimensional analysisof perceived risk in commercial air travel. Journal of Air Transport Management 13, 2007, pp.90-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2006.10.003
  17. Proussaloglou, K., Koppleman, F., Air carrier demand: analysis of market share determinants. Transportation 22, 1995, pp. 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098165
  18. Reisinger, Y., Mavondo, F., Travel anxiety and intentions to ravel I nternationally: implications of travel risk perception. Journal of Travel Research 43, 2005, pp.212-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287504272017
  19. Sage, A.P., White, E.B., Methodologies for risk and hazard assessment: a survey and status report. IEEE Transaction on System, Man, and Cyvernetics SMC-10, 1980, pp.425-441.
  20. Slovic, P., The Perception of Risk. Earthscan, London. 2000.
  21. Stone, R.N., Gronhaug, K., Perceived risk: further considerations for the marketing discipline. European Journal of Marketing 27, 1993, pp.39-50.