International Journal of Contents

The Korea Contents Association (한국콘텐츠학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Strategies Contents for Financial Independent RIS in Proton Accelerator Science and Technology

  • Bae, Khee-Su (School of Business, Chungbuk National University)
  • Received : 2011.04.05
  • Accepted : 2011.05.02
  • Published : 2011.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research would be the first step toward in the long processes of proton technology industrial cluster development by focusing on the region's readiness and acceptability of the proton technology project. As is shown in our questionnaire survey, the top priorities needed to consider for the Proton Technology project are found to be job creation (mean 3.74), regional economic development (mean 3.72), industry infrastructure(3.54), institution for science and education(3.53), economic inequalities(3.33), tourism industry revitalization(3.20). For public servants top priorities in order found to be regional economic development, job creation, industry infrastructure, institution for science and education, economic inequalities, tourism industry revitalization. Universities' priorities in order found to be job creation, regional economic development, institution for science and education, industry infrastructure, economic inequalities, tourism industry revitalization. The mean reliability score for the each party was found to be mayor((3.04), citizens(2.99), province(2.97), private corporation(2.96), and universities((2.93). Of particular note, the mean score except the mayor were all below median (3.00). province(3.24), city council member(3.20), public employees (3.09), private corporation(3.03), nonprofit organization (2.97), mass media (2.96), citizens(2.96), and universities(2.89). The universities and colleges also should revise their strategic plans and thus restructure their internal academic programs, and must develop their own collaborative programs with Proton Engineering Frontier Project, related industries, city, and other government units. Not only educating, training, and providing top-notched man powers to the proton technology industries will be one of their primary missions.

Keywords

References

  1. Andersson, M. and Karlsson, C, "Regional innovation systems in small and median-sized regions: A critical review and assessment", JIBS working paper, 2002.
  2. Athreye S, "Agglomeration and Growth: A Study of the Cambridge Hi-Tech Cluster", SIEPR Discussion. 2001, pp. 00-42.
  3. Capello Roberta, "Spatial Transfer of Knowledge in High Technology Milieux : Leaning Versus collective Learning Processes", Regional Study, Vol.33, no.4, 1999, pp. 353-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950081211
  4. Carlsson Bo, Jacobsson Staffan, Magnus Holmen, Annika Rickne, "Innovation Systems: analytical and methodological issues", Research Policy 31, 2002, pp. 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-X
  5. Chao Alexander et al, Accelerator R & D Report, Snowmass Press, New York, 2001.
  6. Choi, Yong-Ho & Woo-Ik Hwang, "The Supporting System for Venture Firms at Korean Technoparks", 48th World Conference on Advancing Entrepreneurship and Small Business, International Council for Small Business, Northern Ireland, 2003.
  7. Cooke Philip, Uranga Mikel Gomez, Etxebarria Goio, "Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions", Research Policy, Vol.26, 1997, pp. 475-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
  8. Craig, Thomas, "Public management as interagency cooperation: Testing epistemic community at the domestic level", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol.7, no.2, 1997, pp. 221-247. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024347
  9. DTI, Business clusters in the UK-A first assessment. London Press, London, 2001.
  10. Duch, E, "Connecting clusters-Motivation and Examples. Presentation to European Seminar on Cluster Policy", Copenhagen, 2003.
  11. Fontana R, "Factors Affecting Unversity -industry R&D Projects", Reseaech Policy, Vol.35, 2006, pp. 309- 323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.12.001
  12. Freeman, "The National System of Innovation in Historical Perspective", Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, 1995, pp. 211- 217.
  13. Garnsey Elizabeth, Heffernan Paul, "High-t echnology Clustering through Spin-out and Attraction: The Cambridge Case", Regional Studies, Vol.39, no.8, 2005, pp. 1127-1144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400500328289
  14. Global Connect, "Incubating and growing regional technology", The San Diego Case Study, 2006.
  15. Gunasekara Chrys S, "The Regional Role of Universities in Technology Trasfer and Economic Development", British Academy of Management conference, 2004.
  16. Jun Koo, "Knowledge-based Industry Clusters: Evidenced by Geographical Patterns of Patents in Manufacturing", Urban Studies, Vol.42, no.9, 2005, pp. 1487-1505. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500185249
  17. Lucio Cassia, et al, "The Role of Regional Innovation Systems in Regional Transformation Models", Comitato Redazione, Italy, 2005, p.5.
  18. Porter, M.E, "Cluster and the New Economics of Competition", Harvard Business Review,Nov.- Dec,1999, pp. 77-90.
  19. Smith BLR, American Science Policy Since World War II, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D. C, 1990.
  20. Teece, D., G. Pisano. & A. Shuen, "Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18, no.7, 1997, pp. 21-40.