A Study on the Design Characteristic and Improvement of the Studio Type Urban Lifestyle Housing in Seoul

서울시 도시형 생활주택 원룸형 주거의 계획특성 및 개선방안 연구

  • Received : 2011.02.28
  • Accepted : 2011.04.08
  • Published : 2011.04.30

Abstract

A studio type urban lifestyle housing was recently introduced as a new urban multi-housing typology. It was particularly created to meet the increasing housing demand of one-person households due to the population change and the shortage of housing supply. However, some concerns have been raised, because the government's policy has been focused on expanding housing supply by easing certain legal regulations in construction. Poorly planned and managed urban lifestyle housings might degrade living conditions for one-person households and ultimately harm urban environments. As such, this research is conducted to investigate the design characteristics of the studio type urban lifestyle housing from selected construction precedents in Seoul. Critical evaluations are made for the facilities and uses in site plans, unit plans, and shared public spaces. As a result, problem areas are found in the lack of design varieties, privacy protection in units, control of natural environment conditions, and the absence of community spaces. Improvement strategies can be suggested by comparing with some overseas' housing precedents: Design variations can be extended through flexible structure, facility, and furniture systems. Privacy and natural environment can be controled through the integration of interior space configurations and exterior envelope systems. The housing policy needs to be reconsidered to improve a variety in design, residents' social interaction, security, and management. Thereby, the studio type urban lifestyle housing should be holistically approached in terms of design and policy to enrich urban living experiences by residents and communities.

Keywords

References

  1. BIG Architects, BIG, Archilife, NY, 2010
  2. Lane, Barbara M, Housing And Dwelling: Perspectives on Modern Domestic Architecture, 1st ed., Routledge, NY, 2006
  3. Norberg-Schultz, Christian, The Concept of Dwelling, 거주의 개념, 구상적 건축을 향하여, 이재훈, 중판, 태림문화사, 서울, 1992
  4. 국토해양부.한국주거학회, 미래주거환경 변화와 미래주택건설 방안 연구, 한국주거학회, 2008.12
  5. 국토해양부, 도시형 생활주택 가이드, 국토해양부, 2010.3
  6. 변미리 외 3, 서울의 1인가구 증가와 도시정책 수요 연구, 서울시정개발연구원, 2008
  7. 김혜련, 1인가구를 위한 소형주택 공급유형 연구, 서울시립대 석사논문, 2010.8
  8. 김진욱 외 2, 도시형 생활주택의 계획방향 및 설계기준설정에 관한 연구, 건축도시공간연구소, 2009.12
  9. 신상영, 1인가구 주거지의 공간적 분포에 관한연구: 서울시를 사례로, 대한국토도시계획학회지 국토계획 제45권 제4호, 2010.8
  10. 유해연.심우갑, 도시형 생활주택의 계획특성 연구: 단지형 다세 대주택 사례를 중심으로, 대한건축학회논문집(계획계) 통권259 호, 2010.5
  11. Concept, Vol.85, 월간 현대건축, CA현대건축사, 서울, 2006.5
  12. Space, No.503, 공간사, 서울, 2009.10
  13. El Croquis 139: Sanaa Sejima Nishizawa 2004-2008, English and Spanish ed., El Croquis, NY, 2008.4
  14. 법제처, http://www.moleg.gov.kr/