Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation (한국방재학회 논문집)

Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation (한국방재학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Calculation of Direct Runoff Hydrograph considering Hydrodynamic Characteristics of a Basin

유역의 동수역학적 특성을 고려한 직접유출수문곡선 산정

  • Received : 2011.03.09
  • Accepted : 2011.05.11
  • Published : 2011.06.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, after the target basin was divided into both overland and channel grids, the travel time from center of each grid cell to watershed's outlet was calculated based on the manning equation. Through this process, volumetric discharge was calculated according to the isochrones and finally, the direct runoff hydrograph was estimated considering watershed's hydrodynamic characteristics. Sanseong subwatershed located in main stream of Bocheong basin was selected as a target basin. The model parameters are only two: area threshold and channel velocity correction factor; the optimized values were estimated at 3,800 and 3.3, respectively. The developed model based on the tuned parameters led to well-matching results between observed and calculated hydrographs (mean of absolute error of peak discharge: 3.41%, mean of absolute error of peak time: 0.67 hr). Moreover, the analysis results regarding histogram of travel time-contribution area demonstrates that the proposed model characterizes relatively well hydrodynamic characteristics of the catchment due to effective rainfall.

본 연구에서는 대상유역을 지표면과 하천 격자로 분할한 후, Manning 식을 기반으로 각 격자 중심에서 유역 출구점까지의 유하시간을 계산하여 등시간별 체적유량을 산정하였으며, 이로부터 유역의 동수역학적 특성인 특성유속을 고려한 직접유출수문 곡선을 도출하였다. 대상유역은 보청천유역의 산성유역을 선정하였다. 대상유역에 대한 매개변수 산정 결과 흐름누적값은 3800, K는 3.3으로 결정되었다. 보정된 매개변수를 실제사상에 대해 적용하여 검증한 결과 첨두유량과 첨두시간의 평균 절대오차는 각각 3.41%, 0.67 hr로 비교적 양호한 모의결과를 나타냈다. 또한 유효우량에 따른 유하시간별 기여면적 주상도를 분석한 결과 본 연구에서 적용된 모형은 강우강도에 따른 유역의 수리학적 특성을 잘 표현하고 있음을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 건설부/건설교통부 (1986-2002) 국제수문개발계획(IHP)대표유역보고서
  2. Arora, V., Seglenieks, F., Kouwen, N. and Soulis, E. (2001) Scaling aspects of river flow routing, Hydrological Processes, 15, pp. 461-477. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.161
  3. Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R. and Mays, L.W. (1988) Applied Hydrology, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, USA.
  4. Di Lazzaro, M. (2009) Regional analysis of storm hydrographs in the rescaled width function framework. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 373, pp. 352-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.027
  5. D'odorico, P. and Rigon, R. (2003) Hillslope and channel contributions to the hydrologic response, Water Resources Research, 39(5), 1113. doi:10.1029/2002WR001708.
  6. Du, J., Xie, H., Hu, Y., Xu, Y. and Xu, C.Y. (2009) Development and testing of a new storm runoff routing approach based on time variant spatially distributed travel time method, Journal of Hydrology, 369, pp. 44-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.033
  7. Kouwen, N., Soulis, E.D., Pietroniro, A., Donald, J. and Harrington, R.A. (1993) Grouping response units for distributed hydrologic modelling, ASCE, Journal of Water Resources Management and Planning, 119(3), pp. 289-305. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1993)119:3(289)
  8. Lee, K.T. and Yen, B.C. (1997) Geomorphology and Kinematic- WaveñBased Hydrograph Derivation, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 123, pp. 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1997)123:1(73)
  9. Maidment, D.R. (1993) GIS and hydrologic modeling, In: Goodchild, M., Parks, B., Steyaert, L. (Eds.), Environmental Modeling With GIS, Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
  10. Melesse, A.M. (2002) Spatially distributed storm runoff modeling using remote sensing and geographic information systems, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida.
  11. Melesse, A.M. and Graham, W.D. (2004) Storm runoff prediction based on a spatially distributed travel time method utilizing remote sensing and GIS, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 40(4), pp. 863-879. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01051.x
  12. Muzik, I. (1996a) Flood modeling with GIS-derived distributed unit hydrographs, Hydrologic Processes 10, pp. 1401-1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199610)10:10<1401::AID-HYP469>3.0.CO;2-3
  13. Muzik, I. (1996b) Lumped modeling and GIS in flood prediction, In: Singh, V.P., Fiorentino, M. (Eds.), Geographical Information Systems in Hydrology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp. 269-301.
  14. Rinaldo, A., Rigon, R. and Marani, M. (1991) Geomorphological dispersion, Water Resources Research, 27(4), pp. 513-525. https://doi.org/10.1029/90WR02501
  15. Saco, P.M. and Kumar, P. (2002) Kinematic dispersion in stream networks - 1.Coupling hydraulics and network geometry, Water Resources Research, 38(11), pp. 1244-1255.
  16. Shen, C., Tachikawa, Y. and Takara, K. (2004) Rainfall-runoff simulation by using distributed Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph derived from applying flow accumulation value of DEM, Annual Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, JSCE, 48, pp. 1-6.
  17. Vieux, B.E. (2004) Distributed Hydrologic Modeling Using GIS, Kluwer Academic Publishers.