DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of a New Simplified Algorithm for Residual Longitudinal Strength Prediction of Asymmetrically Damaged Ships

비대칭 손상 선박의 잔류 종강도 평가를 위한 간이 해석 알고리즘 개발

  • Choung, Joon-Mo (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Nam, Ji-Myung (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Lee, Min-Seong (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Jeon, Sang-Ik (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Ha, Tae-Bum (Research and Development Center, Korean Register of Shipping)
  • 정준모 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 남지명 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 이민성 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 전상익 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 하태범 (한국선급 기술연구소)
  • Received : 2010.12.24
  • Accepted : 2011.05.15
  • Published : 2011.06.20

Abstract

This paper explains the basic theory and a new development of for the residual strength prediction program of the asymmetrically damaged ships, being capable of searching moment-curvature relations considering neutral axis mobility. It is noted that moment plane and neutral axis plane should be separately defined for asymmetric sections. The validity of the new program is verified by comparing moment-curvature curves of 1/3 scaled frigate model where the results from new algorithm well coincide with experimental and nonlinear FEA results for intact condition and with nonlinear FEA results for damaged condition. Applicability of new algorithm is also verified by applying VLCC model to the newly developed program. It is proved that reduction of residual strengths is visually presented using the new algorithm when damage specifications of ABS, DNV and IMO are applied. It is concluded that the new algorithm shows very good performance to produce moment-curvature relations with neutral axis mobility on the asymmetrically damaged ships. It is expected that the new program based on the developed algorithm can largely reduce design period of FE modeling and increase user conveniences.

Keywords

References

  1. American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), 1995a. Guide for Assessing Hull-Girder Residual Strength for Tankers. [Online] (Updated July 1995) Available at: http://www.eagle.org/ [Accessed June 2010].
  2. American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), 1995b. Guide for Assessing Hull-Girder Residual Strength for Bulk Carriers. [Online] (Updated Nov. 1995) Available at: http://www.eagle.org/ [Accessed June 2010].
  3. Boresi, A.P. Schmidt, R.J. Sidebottom, O.M., 1992. Advanced mechanics of materials. fifth Ed. John Wiley & Sons: New York.
  4. Cho, S.R. Choi, B.W. & Song, I.C., 1998. Post-Ultimate Behaviour of StiffenedPanels subjected to Axial Compression. 2nd International Conference on Thin-Walled Structures, pp.433-440.
  5. Choung, J. & Kim, Y.H., 2010. Study on Section Properties of Asymmetric-Sectioned Vessels. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 47(6), pp.843-849. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2010.47.6.843
  6. Det Norske Veritas (DNV), 2009. Rules for Classification of Ships Part 3 Chapter 1. DNV
  7. Dow, R.S., 1991. Testing and Analysis of a 1/3-Scale Welded Steel Frigate Model, Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Marine Structures, 21-24 May, Dunfermline UK., pp.749-773.
  8. International Association of Classification Societies (IACS), 2010a. Common Structural Rules for Double Hull Oil Tankers. [Online] (Updated July 2010) Available at:http://www.iacs-data.org.uk/ [Accessed August 2010].
  9. International Association of Classification Societies (IACS), 2010b. Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers. [Online] (Updated July 2010) Available at: http://www.iacs-data.org.uk/ [Accessed August 2010].
  10. International Maritime Organization (IMO), 1997, MARPOL 73/78 & 1984 Amend Annex I Chapter III Requirement for Minimizing Oil Pollution from Oil Tankers due to Side and Bottom Damages, IMO.
  11. Lee, J.S. & Yang, P.D.C., 1992. Reliability Assessment against Ultimate Bending Moment of Ships’ Hull Girder. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 29(1), pp.103-112.
  12. Maestro, M. & Marino, A., 1988. An Assessment of the Structural Capability of Damaged Ships: The Plastic Approach in Longitudinal Unsymmetrical Bending and the Influence of Buckling, International Shipbuilding Progress, 36(408), pp.255-265.
  13. Paik, J.K. Thayamballi, A.K. & Che, J.S., 1996. Strength of Ship Hull inder Combined Vertical Bending, Horizontal Bending and Shearing Forces. SNAME Trans, 104, pp. 31-59
  14. Paik, J.K. Thayamballi, A.K. & Yang, S.H., 1998. Residual Strength Assessment of Ships after Collision and Grounding. Marine Technology, 35(1), pp.38-54.
  15. Smith, C.S. Davidson, P.C. Chapman, J.C. & Dowling, P.J., 1988. Strength and Stiffness of Ships' Plating under In-plane Compression and Tension. RINA Transactions, 130, pp.277-296.
  16. Wang, G. Chen, Y. Zhang, H. & Peng, H., 2002. Longitudinal Strength of Ships with Accidental Damages, Marine Structures, 15, pp.119-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8339(01)00018-1

Cited by

  1. Assessment of Ultimate Longitudinal Strength of a VLCC considering Kinematic Displacement Theory vol.50, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2013.50.4.255