Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

  • 제33권6호
  • /
  • Pages.483-489
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 2288-8101(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8586(eISSN)
대한악안면성형재건외과학회 (Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons)
권호 표지

3급 부정교합 환자에서 두개저 성장 양상에 따른 악골 성장 특성에 관한 연구

Study on Characteristics of Maxillofacial Growth in Class III Malocclusion Patients by Cranial Base Growth

  • 손도경 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 박성원 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이재민 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김은자 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 최상문 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김용운 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 최문기 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 오승환 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Son, Do-Kyoung (Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Park, Sung-Won (Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Min (Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Ja (Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Choi, Sang-Mun (Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Woon (Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Choi, Mun-Gi (Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Oh, Sung-Hwan (Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Wonkwang University)
  • 투고 : 2011.08.26
  • 심사 : 2011.10.03
  • 발행 : 2011.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: Craniofacial structure form results from the adaptation to morphologic and functional changes in their neighboring structures for a mutual balance. The purpose of this study is classification of maxillomandibular complex growth pattern follow by cranial base growth pattern. And this study is identifying the correlation between maxilla-mandibular complex growth pattern and orthodontic criteria. Methods: 142 Class III malocclusion patients had orthognathic surgery at Wonkwang University Dental Hospital during April 2004 to October 2010. Patients were divided into 4 groups and the correlation between cranial base and maxillomandibular growth patterns were evaluated. Results: There was a correlation between cranial base and maxillomandibular growth patterns. Positive relationships were found between the occlusal plane, Incisor mandibular plane angle, mandibular plane, positioning of pogonion and the saddle angle, indicating maxillary growth patterns. Negative relationships were found between SNA, SNB, maxillary incisor angle and saddle angle. Positive relationships were found between the ratio of the anterior and posterior cranium, positioning of pogonion and the percentage of cranial depth indicating mandibular growth patterns. Negative relationships were found between the occlusal plane, maxillary incisor angle, mandibular plane, mandibular angle and cranial depth. Conclusion: Cranial base and maxillofacial growth patterns were correlated and the classification should be adjusted before orthognathic surgery.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ellis E 3rd, McNamara JA Jr. Components of adult Class III open-bite malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1984;86:277-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90138-6
  2. Zeng XL. A study of skeletal types of class III malocclusion. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 1993;28:170-3, 191.
  3. Battagel JM. The aetiology of Class III malocclusion examined by tensor analysis. Br J Orthod 1993;20:283-95. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.20.4.283
  4. Battagel JM. The aetiological factors in Class III malocclusion. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:347-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/15.5.347
  5. Delaire J. Maxillary development revisited: relevance to the orthopaedic treatment of Class III malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:289-311. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/19.3.289
  6. Enlow DH, editor. The human face. New York: Hoeber;1968.
  7. Guyer EC, Ellis EE 3rd, McNamara JA Jr, Behrents RG. Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod 1986;56:7-30.
  8. Bjork A. Some biological aspects of prognathism and occlusion of the teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 1950;9:1-40. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016355009087224
  9. Bjork A, Skieller V. Growth of the maxilla in three dimensions as revealed radiographically by the implant method. Br J Orthod 1977;4:53-64. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.4.2.53
  10. Delaire J, Precious D. Interaction of the development of the nasal septum, the nasal pyramid and the face. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1987;12:311-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-5876(87)80007-1
  11. Precious D, Delaire J. Balanced facial growth: a schematic interpretation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;63:637-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(87)90360-4
  12. Jacobson A, Evans WG, Preston CB, Sadowsky PL. Mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 1974;66:140-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(74)90233-4
  13. Kerr WJ, Adams CP. Cranial base and jaw relationship. Am J Phys Anthropol 1988;77:213-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330770209
  14. Rak D, Muretic Z, Slaj M. Relation between cranial base flexure and position of the jaws. Coll Antropol 1997;21:539-47.
  15. Sato S. Case report: developmental characterization of skeletal Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1994;64:105-11.
  16. Sato S, editor. New approach to treatment of malocclusion. Seoul: Ji-Sung Publishing; 1992.
  17. Seren E, Akan H, Toller MO, Akyar S. An evaluation of the condylar position of the temporomandibular joint by computerized tomography in Class III malocclusions: a preliminary study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:483-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70009-5
  18. Solow B, Siersbaek-Nielsen S. Cervical and craniocervical posture as predictors of craniofacial growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:449-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70119-U
  19. Huggare J, Houghton P. Associations between atlantoaxial and craniomandibular anatomy. Growth Dev Aging 1996;60:21-30.
  20. Delaire J, Schendel SA, Tulasne JF. An architectural and structural craniofacial analysis: a new lateral cephalometric analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1981;52:226-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(81)90252-8
  21. Markus AF, Delaire J, Smith WP. Facial balance in cleft lip and palate. I. Normal development and cleft palate. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;30:287-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(92)90178-L
  22. Delaire J, Mercier J. The place of the chin in the architecture of the face. In: Levignac J, editor. The Chin. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1990. p.45-61.
  23. Hong SX, Yi CK. A classification and characterization of skeletal class III malocclusion on etio-pathogenic basis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;30:264-71. https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2001.0088
  24. Sanborn RT. Differences between the facial skeletal patterns of Class III malocclusion and normal occlusion. Angle Orthodont 1955;25:208.
  25. Kim SC, Lee KS. The cephalometric study of facial types in class III malocclusion. Korean J Orthod 1990;20:519-39.
  26. Han DH, Cha KS. The cephalometric study of skeletal types in Class III malocclusion with reduced lower anterior face height. Korean J Orthod 1996;26:205-18.
  27. Lim HH, Yun HJ, Kim KW. A study of the characteristics of craniofacial skeleton on orthognatic surgical cases III patients. Korean J Orthod 1998;28:189-201.
  28. Park CJ, Lee KS. Characteristics of craniofacial structures in severe adult Class III malocclusion. Korean J Orthod 1998;28:219-29.
  29. Mackay F, Jones JA, Thompson R, Simpson W. Craniofacial form in class III cases. Br J Orthod 1992;19:15-20. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.19.1.15
  30. Martone VD, Enlow DH, Hans MG, Broadbent BH Jr, Oyen O. Class I and Class III malocclusion sub-groupings related to headform type. Angle Orthod 1992;62:35-42.
  31. Precious DS, Hall BK. Growth and development of the maxillofacial region. In: Peterson LJ, editor. Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. vol.3. Philadephia: J.B. Lippincott company; 1994. p.1223-9.