Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

Implant Fixture Installation in the Anterior Mandible by Use of a Mucosa Supported Surgical Template Based on Computer Assisted Treatment Planning

컴퓨터보조 기반 점막지지 서지컬템프레이트를 이용한 하악전치부 임플란트 식립

  • Lee, Jee-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Soung-Min (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Jung-Min (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Seo, Mi-Hyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Myoung, Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 이지호 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김성민 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김명주 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 박정민 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 서미현 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 명훈 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이종호 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김명진 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Received : 2011.02.05
  • Accepted : 2011.02.24
  • Published : 2011.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A 73-year-old Korean female patient with a fully edentulous mandible was planned to have five implant fixtures installed in the anterior mandible for the fixed prosthesis. After 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomographic scanning was transferred to OnDemand3D$^{(R)}$ (Cybermed Co., Seoul, Korea) software program for the virtual planning, five fixtures of MK III Groovy RP implants of Branemark System$^{(R)}$ (Nobel Biocare AB Co., Goteborg, Sweden) were installed in the anterior mandible between both mental foramens using In2Guide$^{(R)}$ (CyberMed Co., Seoul, Korea) mucosa-supported surgical template with Quick Guide Kit$^{(R)}$ (Osstem Implant Co., Seoul, Korea) systems. Fixture installations were completed successfully without any complications, such as mental nerve injury, bony bleedings, fenestrations and other unexpected events. Postoperative computed tomographic scans were aligned and fused to the planned implant, then angular and linear deviations were compared with the planned virtual implants. The mean angular deviation between the planned and actual implant axes was $3.42{\pm}1.336^{\circ}$. The mean distance between the planned and actual implant at the neck area was $0.544{\pm}0.290$ mm horizontally and $0.118{\pm}0.079$ mm vertically. The average distance between the planned and actual implant at the apex area was $1.166{\pm}0.566$ mm horizontally and $0.14{\pm}0.091$ mm vertically. These results could be considered more precise and accurate than previous reports, and even our recent results. The entire procedures of this case are reported and reviewed.

Keywords

References

  1. Besimo C, Lambrecht JT, Nidecker A. Dental implant treatement planning with reformatted computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995;24:264-7. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.24.4.9161173
  2. Fortin T, Coudert JL, Champleboux G, Sautot P, Lavallee S. Computer assisted dental implant surgery using computed tomography. J Image Guid Surg 1995;1:53-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-712X(1995)1:1<53::AID-IGS8>3.0.CO;2-L
  3. Komiyama A, Klinge B, Hultin M. Treatment outcome of immediately loaded implants installed in edentulous jaws following computer-assisted virtual treatment planning and flapless surgery. Clin Oral Impl Res 2008;19:677-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01538.x
  4. Komiyama A, Pettersson A, Hultin M, Nasstrom K, Klinge B. Virtually planned and template-guided implant surgery: an experimental model matching approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01826.x
  5. Birkfellner W, Solar P, Gahleitner A, et al. In-vitro assessment of a registration protocol for image guided implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:69-78. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001069.x
  6. Naitoh M, Ariji E, Okumura S, Ohsaki C, Kurita K, Ishigami T. Can implants be correctly angulated based on surgical templates used for osseointegrated dental implants? Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:409-14. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005409.x
  7. Xiaojun C, Yanping L, Yiqun W, Chengtao W. Computeraided oral implantology: methods and applications. J Med Eng Technol 2007;31:459-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091900701401718
  8. Kim SM, Kim MJ, Lee JH, et al. Case analysis of implant fixture installation in the posterior mandible by using of surgical template. J Korean Academy Implant Dentistry 2010;29: 26-32.
  9. Lee JH, Kim SM, Paeng JY, Kim MJ. Implant surgery based on computer simulation surgical stent and the assessment with the image fusion technique. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;36:402-7. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2010.36.5.402
  10. Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997;16:187-98. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.563664
  11. Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computeraided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:234-42.
  12. Tahmaseb A, De Clerck R, Wismeijer D. Computer-guided implant placement: 3D planning software, fixed intraoral reference points, and CAD/CAM technology. a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:541-6.
  13. Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J Periodontol 2005;76:503-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.4.503
  14. Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, et al. Computer technol ogy applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;24:92-109.
  15. Pettersson A, Kero T, Gillot L, et al. Accuracy of CAD/CAMguided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:334-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60072-8
  16. Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery-a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21: 305-13.
  17. Sarment DP, Al-Shammari K, Kazor CE. Stereolithographic surgical templates for placement of dental implants in complex cases. Int J Peiodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:287-95.
  18. Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:571-7.
  19. Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography- derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:394-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.09.033
  20. Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy EA. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. J Periodontol 2008;79:1339-45. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.080059
  21. Besimo CE, Lambrecht JT, Guindy JS. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29:46- 51. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600491
  22. Tardieu PB, Vrielinck L, Escolano E. Coumpter-assisted implant placement. A case report: treatment of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:599-604.
  23. Jabero M, Sarment DP. Advanced surgical guidance technology: a review. Implant Dentistry 2006;15:135-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000217790.68814.1e
  24. Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M, Jung RE. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry. Clin Oral Impl Res 2009;20:73-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01788.x