DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Carbon and nitrogen status in litterfall of a red pine stand with varying degrees of damage from pine wilt disease

  • Kim, Choon-Sig (Department of Forest Resources, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Jeong, Jae-Yeob (Department of Forest Resources, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Cho, Hyun-Seo (Department of Forest Resources, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Soo (Southern Forest Research Center, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Park, Nam-Chang (Southern Forest Research Center, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • Received : 2011.01.11
  • Accepted : 2011.03.21
  • Published : 2011.06.01

Abstract

We evaluated the carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) status of litterfall in a natural red pine (Pinus densiflora) stand damaged by pine wilt disease in Jinju City, which was one of the areas severely affected by the disease in Korea. A significant correlation (P < 0.05) was found between tree density and basal area and the C and N status of litterfall components, but C and N status was not correlated with mean diameter at breast height in the pine wilt disease stands. Needle-litter C and N concentrations were linearly related (P < 0.05) to basal area in pine wilt disease stands. Needle-litter C concentration decreased with a decrease in damage intensity due to pine wilt disease, whereas litter N concentration increased with an increase of basal area in pine wilt disease stands. The linear regression equations developed for litterfall C and N inputs were significant (P < 0.05), with basal area accounting for 50-86% of the variation, except for cone and flower litter. The results indicated that the incidence of pine wilt disease could impact the quality and quantity of C and N in litterfall of pine stands suffering from pine wilt disease.

Keywords

References

  1. Baker TT III, Lockaby BG, Conner WH, Meier CE, Stanturf JA, Burke MK. 2001. Leaf litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics in four southern forested floodplain communities. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65: 1334-1347. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.6541334x
  2. Berg B, Laskowski R. 2006. Litter decomposition: a guide to carbon and nutrient turnover. Adv Ecol Res 38: 20-71.
  3. Bert D, Danjon F. 2006. Carbon concentration variations in the roots, stem and crown of mature Pinus pinaster (Ait.). For Ecol Manag 222: 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.030
  4. Bray JR, Gorham E. 1964. Litter production in forests of the world. Adv Ecol Res 2: 101-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60331-1
  5. Christensen O. 1975. Wood litter fall in relation to abscissions, environmental factors, and the decomposition cycle in a Danish oak forest. Oikos 26: 187-195. https://doi.org/10.2307/3543708
  6. Clark KL, Skowronski N, Hom J. 2010. Invasive insects impact forest carbon dynamics. Glob Change Biol 16: 88-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01983.x
  7. Enda N. 1989. The status of pine wilting disease caused by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner et Buhrer) Nickle and its control in Korea. J Korean For Soc 78: 248-253.
  8. Hansen K, Vesterdal L, Schmidt IK, Gundersen P, Sevel L, Bastrup-Birk A, Pedersen LB, Bille-Hansen J. 2009. Litterfall and nutrient return in five tree species in a common garden experiment. For Ecol Manag 257: 2133-2144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.021
  9. Inagaki Y, Kuramoto S, Torii A, Shinomiya Y, Fukata H. 2008. Effects of thinning on leaf-fall and leaf-litter nitrogen concentration in hinoki cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa Endlicher) plantation stands in Japan. For Ecol Manag 255: 1859-1867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.007
  10. Kim C, Jang KS, Kim JB, Byun JK, Lee CH, Jeon KS. 2010a. Relationship between soil properties and incidence of pine wilt disease at stand level. Landsc Ecol Eng 6: 119-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-009-0087-2
  11. Kim C, Jeong J, Cho HS, Son Y. 2010b. Carbon and nitrogen status of litterfall, litter decomposition and soil in even-aged larch, red pine and rigitaeda pine plantations. J Plant Res 123: 403-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-010-0317-6
  12. Kim C, Son Y, Lee WK, Jeong J, Noh NJ. 2009. Influences of forest tending works on carbon distribution and cycling in a Pinus densiflora S. et Z. stand in Korea. For Ecol Manag 257: 1420-1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.12.015
  13. Kwon TS, Shin JH, Lim JH, Kim YK, Lee EJ. 2011. Management of pine wilt disease in Korea through preventative sivicultural control. For Ecol Manag 261: 562-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.11.008
  14. Lorenz K, Lal R. 2010. Carbon Sequestration in Forest Ecosystems. Springer, New York, pp 103-158.
  15. Morehouse K, Johns T, Kaye J, Kaye M. 2008. Carbon and nitrogen cycling immediately following bark beetle outbreaks in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. For Ecol Manag 255: 2698-2708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.050
  16. Pedersen LB, Bille-Hansen J. 1999. A comparison in litterfall and element fluxes in even aged Norway spruce, sitka spruce and beech stands in Denmark. For Ecol Manag 114: 55-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00381-8
  17. Perez G, Díer JJ, Ibeas F, Pajares JA. 2009. Assessing pine wilt disease risk under a climate change scenario in northwestern Spain. In: Managing Forest Ecosystems: The Challenge of Climate Change (Bravo F, LeMay V, Jandl R, von Gadow K, eds). Springer, New York, pp 269-282.
  18. Peri PL, Gargalione V, Pastur GM, Lencinas MV. 2010. Carbon accumulation along a stand development sequence of Nothofagus antarctica forests across a gradient in site quality in Southern Patagonia. For Ecol Manag 260: 229-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.027
  19. SAS Institute Inc. 2003. SAS/STAT Statistical Software. Version 9.1. SAS publishing, Cary, NC.
  20. Shin SC, Han HR. 2006. Current status on research and management of pine wilt disease in Korea. International Symposium of Current Status on Research & Management of Pine Wilt Disease, 2006 Oct 20, Seoul, pp 31-44.
  21. Zhang Q, Wang C, Wang X, Quan X. 2009. Carbon concentration variability of 10 Chinese temperate tree species. For Ecol Manag 258: 722-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.05.009