DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sensitivity Analysis of the 217PlusTM Component Models for Reliability Prediction of Electronic Systems

전자 시스템 신뢰도 예측을 위한 217PlusTM 부품모형의 민감도 분석

  • Jeon, Tae-Bo (Department of Industrial Engineering, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2011.09.26
  • Accepted : 2011.11.17
  • Published : 2011.12.31

Abstract

MIL-HDBK-217 has played a pivotal role in reliability prediction of electronic equipments for more than 30 years. Recently, RIAC developed a new methodology $217Plus^{TM}$which officially replaces MIL-HDBK-217. Sensitivity analysis of the 217Plus component models to various parameters has been performed and meaningful observations have been drawn in this study. We first briefly reviewed the $217Plus^{TM}$ methodolog and compared it with the conventional model, MIL-HDBK-217. We then performed sensitivity analysis $217Plus^{TM}$ component models to various parameters. Based on the six parameters and an orthogonal array selected, we have performed indepth analyses concerning parameter effects on the model. Our result indicates that, among various parameters, operating temperature and temperature rise during operation have the most significant impacts on the life of a component, and thus a design robust to high temperature is the most importantly required. Next, year of manufacture, duty cycle, and voltage stress are weaker but may be significant when they are in heavy load conditions. Although our study is restricted to a specific type of diodes, the results are still valid to other cases. The results in this study not only figure out the behavior of the predicted failure rate as a function of parameters but provide meaningful guidelines for practical applications.

Keywords

References

  1. MiL-HDBK-217F Notice 2(1995), Military Handbook, Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment, Department of Defense.
  2. Denson, W. (2006), Handbook of $217Plus^{TM}$ Reliability Prediction Models, RIAC.
  3. Nicholls, D. (2007), "What is $217Plus^{TM}$ and Where Did It Come From?", IEEE, pp. 22-27.
  4. Nicholls, D. (2006), "An Overview of the $217Plus^{TM}$ System Reliability Assessment Methodology", RIAC Journal, 4th Qtr., pp. 20-22.
  5. Dylis, D. D. (2001), "PRISM: A new Approach to Reliability Prediction"; American Society for Quality Control (ASQC) Reliability Review; Vol. 2, No. 1.
  6. Brown, L, M. (2003), "Comparing Reliability Predictions to field data for Plastic parts in a Military, Airborne Environment", 2003 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 27-30 Jan, pp. 207-213.
  7. Kleyner, A. and Bender, M. (2003), "Enhanced Reliability Prediction Method Based on Merging Military Standards Approach with Manufacturer's Warranty Data", 2003 Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, IEEE, pp. 202-206.
  8. Smith, C. and Womack, J. (2004), "Raytheon Assessment of PRISM as a field failure prediction", IEEE Annual Reliability and maintainability Symposium Proceedings.
  9. Peace, G. S. (1993), Taguchi Methods, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
  10. Taguchi, G., Chowdhury, S., Wu, Y. (2005), Taguchi's Quality Engineering Handbook, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  11. Jeon, T. B. (2010), Reliability Predictions of Electrical and Electronic System, Kyowoosa.
  12. Nicholls, D. (2007), "An Introduction to the RIAC $217Plus^{TM}$ Component Failure Rate Models", RIAC Journal, 1st Qtr., pp. 16-21.
  13. Nicholls, D. (2007), "The RIAC $217Plus^{TM}$ Capacity and Diode Failure Rate Models", RIAC Journal, 2nd Qtr., pp. 16-21.