지능정보연구 (Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems)

  • 제17권1호
  • /
  • Pages.17-35
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 2288-4866(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4882(eISSN)
한국지능정보시스템학회 (Korea Intelligent Information System Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

퍼지관계 이론에 의한 집단지성의 도출

Elicitation of Collective Intelligence by Fuzzy Relational Methodology

  • 주영도 (강남대학교 공과대학 컴퓨터미디어 공학부)
  • Joo, Young-Do (Department of Computer and Media Engineering, College of Engineering, Kangnam University)
  • 투고 : 2010.12.17
  • 심사 : 2010.01.12
  • 발행 : 2011.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

집단지성은 개인들의 협업과 경쟁을 통한 공통이해에 기반한 생산으로서 대중의 지혜를 창출하는 개별 지성들의 통합체라고 할 수 있다. 집단지성의 활용은 공개와 공유 그리고 참여의 기본 철학을 갖고 있는 웹 2.0의 주요한 설계원칙으로 자리잡은 후로, 이와 관련된 연구가 다양하게 진행되고 있다. 이 논문은 개인들간의 관계와 상호작용에 대한 인식을 기반으로 집단지성을 밝혀보려는 방법론을 제안한다. 응용대상은 정보검색과 분류 분야이며, 개인지성의 표현과 도출을 위해 개인 컨스트럭트 이론과 지식 그리드 기법에 퍼지관계이론을 적용한다. 개인의 개별적인 지성은 헤세 다이어그램의 형태로 구현된 지성 구조로 표현하여 내재된 지식적인 의미를 분석한다. 논문의 목적인 집단지성의 도출은 개인지성들의 비교를 통해 상호간 공유와 일치를 찾아낼 수 있는 유사성 이론의 도입에 의해 이루어진다. 제안하는 방법론은 퍼지관계 이론 및 퍼지 매칭 알고리즘을 기반으로 실험 데이터로부터 유사성을 측정하고, 개인지성들을 대표할 수 있는 최적의 집단지성을 이끌어내고자 한다.

The collective intelligence is a common-based production by the collaboration and competition of many peer individuals. In other words, it is the aggregation of individual intelligence to lead the wisdom of crowd. Recently, the utilization of the collective intelligence has become one of the emerging research areas, since it has been adopted as an important principle of web 2.0 to aim openness, sharing and participation. This paper introduces an approach to seek the collective intelligence by cognition of the relation and interaction among individual participants. It describes a methodology well-suited to evaluate individual intelligence in information retrieval and classification as an application field. The research investigates how to derive and represent such cognitive intelligence from individuals through the application of fuzzy relational theory to personal construct theory and knowledge grid technique. Crucial to this research is to implement formally and process interpretatively the cognitive knowledge of participants who makes the mutual relation and social interaction. What is needed is a technique to analyze cognitive intelligence structure in the form of Hasse diagram, which is an instantiation of this perceptive intelligence of human beings. The search for the collective intelligence requires a theory of similarity to deal with underlying problems; clustering of social subgroups of individuals through identification of individual intelligence and commonality among intelligence and then elicitation of collective intelligence to aggregate the congruence or sharing of all the participants of the entire group. Unlike standard approaches to similarity based on statistical techniques, the method presented employs a theory of fuzzy relational products with the related computational procedures to cover issues of similarity and dissimilarity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Beail, Nigel (Ed.), "Repertory Grid Technique and Personal Constructs", Croom Helm, London, 1985.
  2. Berners-Lee, T. et al., "A Framework for Web Science", Foundation and Trends in Web Science, Vol.1, No.1(2006), 263-275.
  3. Bandler, W. and L. J. Kohout, "Special Properties, Closures and Interiors of Crisp and Fuzzy Relations", Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 26, No.3(1988), 317-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(88)90126-1
  4. Bandler, W. and L. J. Kohout, "Semantics of Implication Operators and Fuzzy Relational Products", International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol.12(1986A), 89-116.
  5. Bandler, W. and L. J. Kohout, "Mathematical Relation", Systems and Control Encyclopedia, Pergamon Press, New York, (1986B), 4000-4008.
  6. Bandler, W. and L. J. Kohout, "Fuzzy Power Sets and Fuzzy Implication Operators", Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.4, No.1(1980), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(80)90060-3
  7. Bannister, D. and F. Fransella, "Inquiring Man : The Psychology of Personal Constructs", Croom Helm, London, 1986.
  8. Joo, Y. and C.-S. Noe, "Development of the Algorithm for the Selection of Clinical Investigations in Fuzzy Knowledge-Based System", Korea Telecom Journal, Vol.3, No.1 (1998), 22-33.
  9. Gordon-Murnane, L., "Social Bookmarking, Foksonomies, and Web 2.0 Tools", Searcher, Vol. 14, No.6(2006), 26-39.
  10. Hendler, J. and O. Lassila, "SemWeb@5 : Current Status and Future Promise of the Semantic Web", Semantic Technology Conference, 2006.
  11. Kelly, G. A., "The Psychology of Personal Constructs", Norton, New York, 1965.
  12. Kim, S.-R., Y. Joo and K.-H. Ryu, "A Cognitive Structure for a Knowledge-Based System : Implementation and Interpretation", Journal of Electrical Engineering and Information Science, Vol.3, No.5(1998), 563-572.
  13. Kroski, E., "The Hive Mind Folksonomies and User-based Tagging", InfoTangle, 2005.
  14. Mancini, V. and W. Bandler, "Congruence of Structures in Urban Knowledge Representation", Uncertainty and Intelligent Systems, Springer Verlag, Berlin, (1988), 219-225.
  15. O'Reilly, T., "What is Web 2.0 : Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software", http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/time/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html 2005.
  16. Osgood, C. E., G. J. Suci and P. H. Tannenbaum, "The Measurement of Meaning", University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1967.
  17. Owyang J., "The Future of the Social Web", Forrest Research, 2009.
  18. Shadbolt, N., W. Hall and T. Berners-Lee, "The Semantic Web Revisited", IEEE Intelligent System, 2007.
  19. Shaw, M. L. G. "Methodology for Sharing Personal Construct Systems", Journal of Constructivist Psychology, Vol.7(1994), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720539408405086
  20. Stilller, E. et al., "Expert System Design : Employing Relational Techniques in Urban Modeling", Advances in Support Systems Research, Canada, (1990), 1003-1012.
  21. Surowiecki, J., "The Wisdom of Crowds", Anchor, 2005.
  22. Wasserman S. and K. Faust, "Social Network Analysis : Methods and Applications", Cambridge University Press, 1991.
  23. Watts, D. and P. Dodds, "Influentials, Networks and Public Opinion Formation", Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.34, No.4(2007), 441-458. https://doi.org/10.1086/518527
  24. Willmott, R., "Mean Measures of Containment and Equality between Fuzzy Sets", Proceedings of the 11th Annual Symposium of Multi-valued Logic, IEEE, (1981), 183-190.
  25. Willmott, R., "Two Fuzzier Implication Operators in the Theory of Fuzzy Power Sets", Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.4, No.2(1980), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(80)90061-5
  26. Xu, Z., Y. Fu, J. Mao and D. Su, "Towards the Semantic Web : Collaborative Tag Suggestions", Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop, Edinburgh, (2006), 756-761.
  27. Zadeh, L. A. "The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Application to Approximate Reasoning", Information Sciences, Vol.8(1975), 199-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5
  28. Zadeh, L. A., "Fuzzy Sets", Information and Control, Vol.8(1965), 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X