Carbon letters

Korean Carbon Society (한국탄소학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Process Condition on Tensile Properties of Carbon Fiber

  • Lee, Sung-Ho (Institute of Advanced Composite Materials, Korea Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hoon (Institute of Advanced Composite Materials, Korea Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Ku, Bon-Cheol (Institute of Advanced Composite Materials, Korea Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Jun-Kyong (Institute of Advanced Composite Materials, Korea Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Chung, Yong-Sik (Department of Textile Engineering, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2011.01.06
  • Accepted : 2011.02.21
  • Published : 2011.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

For polyacrylonitrile (PAN) based carbon fiber (CF) process, we developed a lab scale wet spinning line and a continuous tailor-made stabilization system with ten columns for controlling temperature profile. PAN precursor was spun with a different spinning rate. PAN spun fibers were stabilized with a total duration of 45 to 110 min at a given temperature profile. Furthermore, a stabilization temperature profile was varied with the last column temperature from 230 to $275^{\circ}C$. Stabilized fibers were carbonized in nitrogen atmosphere at $1200^{\circ}C$ in a furnace. Morphologies of spun and CFs were observed using optical and scanning electron microscopy, respectively. Tensile properties of resulting CFs were measured. The results revealed that process conditions such as spinning rate, stabilization time, and temperature profile affect microstructure and tensile properties of CFs significantly.

Keywords

References

  1. Baojun Q, Ding P, Zhenqiou W. Adv Polym Tech, 6, 509 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1002/adv.1986.060060408
  2. Ying L, Hou C, Fei W. J Appl Polym Sci, 100, 4447 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.22344
  3. Hou C, Qu R, Wang C, Ying L. J Appl Polym Sci, 101, 3616 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.22696
  4. Fitzer E, Frohs W, Heine M. Carbon, 24, 387 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(86)90257-5
  5. Kim J, Kim YC, Ahn W, Kim CY. Polym Eng Sci, 33, 1452 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760332203
  6. Yamane A, Sawai D, Kameda T, Kanamoto T, Ito M, Porter RS. Macromolecules, 30, 4170 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1021/ma9614095
  7. Shimada I, Takahagi T, Fukuhara M, Morita K, Ishitani A. J Polym Sci, Part A: Polym Chem, 24, 1989 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.1986.080240819
  8. Dalton S, Heatley F, Budd PM. Polymer, 40, 5531 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00778-2
  9. Xue TJ, McKinney MA, Wilkie CA. Polym Degrad Stab, 58, 193 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00048-7
  10. Buckley JD, Edie DD. Carbon-Carbon Materials and Composites, NASA Reference Publication 1254, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC (1992).

Cited by

  1. Roles of Nickel Layer Deposition on Surface and Electric Properties of Carbon Fibers vol.32, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2011.32.5.1630
  2. Structural Evolution of Polyacrylonitrile Fibers in Stabilization and Carbonization vol.02, pp.02, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4236/aces.2012.22032
  3. Superhydrophobic carbon-based materials: a review of synthesis, structure, and applications vol.15, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2014.15.2.089
  4. Influence of processing parameters on the properties of carbon fibres - an overview vol.47, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.201600630