DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

원발 혹은 재발성 비소세포 폐암 환자에서 사이버나이프률 이용한 체부 방사선 수술의 치료 결과

Treatment Results of CyberKnife Radiosurgery for Patients with Primary or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

  • 김우철 (인하대학교 의과대학 방사선종양학교실) ;
  • 김헌정 (인하대학교 의과대학 방사선종양학교실) ;
  • 박정훈 (인하대학교 의과대학 방사선종양학교실) ;
  • 허현도 (인하대학교 의과대학 방사선종양학교실) ;
  • 최상현 (인하대학교 의과대학 방사선종양학교실)
  • Kim, Woo-Chul (Department of Radiation Oncology, lnha University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hun-Jung (Department of Radiation Oncology, lnha University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Hoon (Department of Radiation Oncology, lnha University School of Medicine) ;
  • Huh, Hyun-Do (Department of Radiation Oncology, lnha University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Sang-Huoun (Department of Radiation Oncology, lnha University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2010.12.03
  • 심사 : 2011.03.07
  • 발행 : 2011.03.30

초록

목 적: 초기 비소세포성 폐암 환자에서 수술적 절제 이외의 국소 치료로 최근 방사선 수술의 사용이 늘고 있다. 이에 저자들은 초기 혹은 재발한 비소세포성 폐암 환자를 대상으로 시행한 체부 방사선 수술의 치료 결과를 분석하여 그 유용성을 알아 보고하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 비소세포성 폐 종양에 대하여 방사선 수술이 시행되었던 24명의 환자, 28 lesion에 대하여 후향적 분석을 시행하였다. 이 중 원발성 종양은 19명 재발한 환자는 5명이었고 재발한 환자 5명 중 3명이 이전 치료 부위에서 재발한 환자 이었다. 원발성 종양 19명 중에서 4명은 외부 방사선 치료 후 추가로 방사선 수술을 시행 받았다. 24명의 초기 병기는 IA, IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IV가 각각 7, 3, 2, 2, 3, 1, 6명이었고, 방사선 수술 당시의 T 병기는 T1 lesion이 13곳, T2가 12곳, T3가 3곳이었다. 방사선 수술은 6 MV X-ray를 이용하였고 planning target volume 1 (PTV1)에 총 방사선량 15~60 Gy(median, 50 Gy)를 3회 혹은 5회에 걸쳐 처방하여 시행하였다. 중앙 추적관찰기간은 469일이었다. 결 과: 28곳의 GTV는 0.7~108.7 mL (median, 22.9 m L)이었고, PTV1 은 5.3~184.8 mL (median, 65.4 m L)이었다. 3개월 반응률은 complete response (CR) 14곳, partial response (PR) 11곳, stable disease (SD) 3곳이었고, 마지막 추적에서의 치료반응은 CR 13곳, PR 9곳, SD 2곳, progressive disease (PD) 4곳이었다. 원발종양으로 초기 병기 IA, IB 10명에서는 50일만에 1명이 폐렴으로 사망하였고 1명이 국소재발 하였으나 나머지 환자는 6개월에서 2년간 국소재발 없이 추적관찰 되고 있으며, IIA-IIB 환자는 4명으로 환자 수가 적어서 뚜렷한 결론을 내리기 어려웠고, 재발성 폐암 환자 5명을 포함하는 10명의 IIIA-IV 병기에서는 사망 3명, 국소재발 1명, loco-regional failure 1명, regional failure 2명으로 좋지 않은 치료 결과를 보였다. 이 중에서 방사선 수술을 시행한 장소에서 재발한 경우는 총 28 1esion 중 4곳으로 85.8%의 국소제어율을 보였다. 방사선치료 양은 biologically equivalent dose (BEd) 100 $Gy_{10}$ 이하인 8 lesion 중에서 3 lesion에서 국소 재발하여 100 $Gy_{10}$ 이상인 20 lesion 중에서는 1 lesion에서만 재발한 경우보다 나빴다. 또한 중앙부의 종양과 방사선수술 당시의 병기가 T2 이상인 경우가 재발이 많았다. 결 론: 비소세포성 폐암환자에서 사이버나이프를 이용한 체부 방사선 수술은 부작용이 적으면서 높은 국소제어율을 얻을 수 있는 치료이며, 주변부의 T1 병기의 폐암에 대해서 BED 100 $Gy_{10}$ 이상의 방사선 치료가 국소제어율을 높이는데 도움이 된다고생각된다.

Purpose: Recently, the use of radiosurgery as a local therapy in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer has become favored over surgical resection. To evaluate the efficacy of radiosurgery, we analyzed the results of stereotactic body radiosurgery in patients with primary or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. Materials and Methods: We reviewed medical records retrospectively of total 24 patients (28 lesions) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received stereotactic body radiosurgery (SBRT) at Inha University Hospital. Among the 24 patients, 19 had primary NSCLC and five exhibited recurrent disease, with three at previously treated areas. Four patients with primary NSCLC received SBRT after conventional radiation therapy as a boost treatment. The initial stages were IA in 7, IB in 3, IIA in 2, IIB in 2, IIIA in 3, IIIB in 1, and IV in 6. The T stages at SBRT were T1 lesion in 13, T2 lesion in 12, and T3 lesion in 3. 6MV X-ray treatment was used for SBRT, and the prescribed dose was 15~60 Gy (median: 50 Gy) for PTV1 in 3~5 fractions. Median follow up time was 469 days. Results: The median GTV was 22.9 mL (range, 0.7 to 108.7 mL) and median PTV1 was 65.4 mL (range, 5.3 to 184.8 mL). The response rate at 3 months was complete response (CR) in 14 lesions, partial response (PR) in 11 lesions, and stable disease (SD) in 3 lesions, whereas the response rate at the time of the last follow up was CR in 13 lesions, PR in 9 lesions, SD in 2 lesions, and progressive disease (PD) in 4 lesions. Of the 10 patients in stage 1, one patient died due to pneumonia, and local failure was identified in one patient. Of the 10 patients in stages III-IV, three patients died, local and loco-regional failure was identified in one patient, and regional failure in 2 patients. Total local control rate was 85.8% (4/28). Local recurrence was recorded in three out of the eight lesions that received below biologically equivalent dose 100 $Gy_{10}$. Among 20 lesions that received above 100 $Gy_{10}$, only one lesion failed locally. There was a higher recurrence rate in patients with centrally located tumors and T2 or above staged tumors. Conclusion: SBRT using a CyberKnife was proven to be an effective treatment modality for early stage patients with NSCLC based on high local control rate without severe complications. SBRT above total 100 $Gy_{10}$ for peripheral T1 stage patients with NSCLC is recommended.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Naruke T, Goya T, Tsuchiya R, Suemasu K. Prognosis and survival in resected lung carcinoma based on the new international staging system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;96:440-447
  2. Mountain CF. A new international staging system for lung cancer. Chest 1986;89(4 Suppl):225S-233S
  3. Kaskowitz L, Graham MV, Emami B, Halverson KJ, Rush C. Radiation therapy alone for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993;27:517-523 https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(93)90374-5
  4. Dosoretz DE, Katin MJ, Blitzer PH, et al. Medically inoperable lung carcinoma: the role of radiation therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 1996;6:98-104 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4296(96)80006-3
  5. Ahn SH, Han MS, Yoon JH, et al. Treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer with CyberKnife, image-guided robotic stereotactic radiosurgery. Oncol Rep 2009;21:693-696
  6. Banki F, Luketich JD, Chen H, Christie N, Pennathur A. Stereotactic radiosurgery for lung cancer. Minerva Chir 2009;64:589-598
  7. Brown WT, Wu X, Fayad F, et al. CyberKnife radiosurgery for stage I lung cancer: results at 36 months. Clin Lung Cancer 2007;8:488-492 https://doi.org/10.3816/CLC.2007.n.033
  8. Fakiris AJ, McGarry RC, Yiannoutsos CT, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small-cell lung carcinoma: four-year results of a prospective phase II study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;75:677-682 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.042
  9. Haasbeek CJ, Lagerwaard FJ, de Jaeger K, Slotman BJ, Senan S. Outcomes of stereotactic radiotherapy for a new clinical stage I lung cancer arising postpneumonectomy. Cancer 2009;115:587-594 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24068
  10. Pennathur A, Luketich JD, Heron DE, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer in high-risk patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:597-604 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.06.046
  11. Baumann P, Nyman J, Hoyer M, et al. Outcome in a prospective phase II trial of medically inoperable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:3290-3296 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.5681
  12. McGarry RC, Papiez L, Williams M, Whitford T, Timmerman RD. Stereotactic body radiation therapy of early-stage non-small-cell lung carcinoma: phase I study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;63:1010-1015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.073
  13. Onishi H, Shirato H, Nagata Y, et al. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HypoFXSRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: updated results of 257 patients in a Japanese multi-institutional study. J Thorac Oncol 2007;2(7 Suppl 3):S94-S100 https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e318074de34
  14. Baumann P, Nyman J, Lax I, et al. Factors important for efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy of medically inoperable stage I lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of patients treated in the Nordic countries. Acta Oncol 2006;45:787-795 https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860600904862
  15. Zimmermann FB, Geinitz H, Schill S, et al. Stereotactic hypofractionated radiotherapy in stage I (T1-2 N0 M0) non-small- cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Acta Oncol 2006;45:796-801 https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860600913210
  16. Timmerman R, McGarry R, Yiannoutsos C, et al. Excessive toxicity when treating central tumors in a phase II study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4833-4839 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.07.5937
  17. Brown WT, Wu X, Amendola B, et al. Treatment of early non-small cell lung cancer, stage IA, by image-guided robotic stereotactic radioablation--CyberKnife. Cancer J 2007;13:87-94 https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0b013e31803c5415
  18. Brown WT, Wu X, Fayad F, et al. Application of robotic stereotactic radiotherapy to peripheral stage I non-small cell lung cancer with curative intent. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2009;21:623-631 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2009.06.006
  19. Onishi H, Araki T, Shirato H, et al. Stereotactic hypofractionated high-dose irradiation for stage I nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: clinical outcomes in 245 subjects in a Japanese multiinstitutional study. Cancer 2004;101:1623-1631 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20539
  20. Chai GY, Lim YK, Kang KM, et al. Comparison of threeand four-dimensional robotic radiotherapy treatment plans for lung cancers. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 2010;28:238-248 https://doi.org/10.3857/jkstro.2010.28.4.238
  21. Giraud P, Antoine M, Larrouy A, et al. Evaluation of microscopic tumor extension in non-small-cell lung cancer for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;48:1015-1024 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00750-1
  22. Grills IS, Fitch DL, Goldstein NS, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of microscopic extension in lung adenocarcinoma: defining clinical target volume for radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;69:334-341 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.023
  23. Chang JY, Balter PA, Dong L, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy in centrally and superiorly located stage I or isolated recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;72:967-971 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.001
  24. Sugi K, Nawata K, Fujita N, et al. Systematic lymph node dissection for clinically diagnosed peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer less than 2 cm in diameter. World J Surg 1998;22:290-294 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689900384
  25. Miller DL, Rowland CM, Deschamps C, Allen MS, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC. Surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer 1 cm or less in diameter. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1545-1550 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03525-7
  26. Iwasaki A, Shirakusa T, Yoneda S, Makimoto Y, Enatsu S, Hamada T. Results of surgical treatment for non-small cell lung cancer of 20 mm or less in diameter. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;52:293-297 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-821155
  27. Konaka C, Ikeda N, Hiyoshi T, et al. Peripheral nonsmall cell lung cancers 2.0 cm or less in diameter: proposed criteria for limited pulmonary resection based upon clinicopathological presentation. Lung Cancer 1998;21:185-191 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5002(98)00057-9

피인용 문헌

  1. 사이버나이프에서 Xsight spine tracking system을 이용한 3D 표적위치보정의 유용성 평가 vol.13, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2015.13.1.331
  2. Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery Versus SBRT for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis vol.22, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2020.04.017