Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology

The Korean Society of Wood Science & Technology (한국목재공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bonding Performance of Glulam Reinforced with Textile Type of Glass- and Aramid-Fiber, GFRP and CFRP

  • Kim, Keon-Ho (Department of Forest Biomaterials Engineering, College of Forest & Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Hong, Soon-Il (Department of Forest Biomaterials Engineering, College of Forest & Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2010.11.29
  • Accepted : 2011.01.28
  • Published : 2011.03.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To evaluate the bonding performance of reinforced glulam, the textile type of glass fiber and aramid fiber, and the sheet type of glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) and carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) were used as reinforcements. The reinforced glulam was manufactured by inserting reinforcement between the outmost and middle lamination of 5ply glulam. The types of adhesives used in this study were polyvinyl acetate resins (MPU500H, and MPU600H), polyurethane resin and resorcinol resin. The block shear strengths of the textile type in glass fiber reinforced glulam using MPU500H and resorcinol resin were higher than 7.1 N/$mm^2$, and these glulams passed the wood failure requirement of Korean standards (KS). In case of the sheet types, GFRP reinforced glulams using MPU500H, polyurethane resin and resorcinol resin, and CFRP reinforced glulams using MPU500H and polyurethane resin passed the requirement of KS. The textile type of glass fiber reinforced glulam using resorcinol resin after water and boiling water soaking passed the delamination requirement of KS. The only GFRP reinforced glulam using MPU500H after water soaking passed the delamination requirement of KS. We conclude that the bonding properties of adhesive according to reinforcements are one of the prime factors to determine the bonding performance of the reinforced glulam.

Keywords

References

  1. Gilfillan, J. R., S. G. Gilbert, and G. R. H. Patrick. 2003. Journal of reinforced Plastics and composites 22(15): 1373-1388. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168403035583
  2. Sonti, S. S. and H. V. S. GangaRao. 1995. 50th Annual Conf. Composites Institute, Cincinnati.
  3. GangaRao, H. V. S. 1997. Wood Des. Focus pp. 13-18.
  4. Davalos, J. F., E. Barbero, and U. Munipalle. 1992. in Structures Congress X, pp. 47-50, ASCE, SanAntonio, TX.
  5. Dagher, H. J., T. Kimball, B. Abdel-Magid, and S. M. Shaler. 1996. National Conf. on Wood Transportation Structures.
  6. Tingley, D. A., C. Gai, and E. Giltner. 1997. J. Compos. Constr. 1(4): 160-167. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:4(160)
  7. HANDBOOK OF ADHESIVES. 1991. Adhesion Society of Japan.
  8. Raftery, G. M., A. M. Harte, and P. D. Rodd. 2009. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 29(2): 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.01.006
  9. Davalos, J. F., P. Z. Qiao, and B. S. Trimble. 2000. Journal of Composites Technology & Research, JCTRER 22(4): 224-231. https://doi.org/10.1520/CTR10544J

Cited by

  1. Adhesive Performance and Fracture Toughness Evaluation of FRP-Reinforced Laminated Plate vol.43, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2015.43.6.868
  2. Performance Evaluation of Bending Strength of Curved Composite Glulams Made of Korean White Pine vol.43, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2015.43.4.463
  3. Fracture Toughness of Glass Fiber Reinforced Laminated Timbers vol.43, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2015.43.6.861