The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of cephalometric norms between Mongolian and Korean adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced profiles

조화로운 측모를 가진 몽골인과 한국인 성인 정상교합자의 측모두부계측방사선학적 비교 연구

  • Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University) ;
  • Gansukh, Odontuya (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University) ;
  • Amarsaikhan, Bazar (Department of Prosthodontics and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Health Science University of Mongolia) ;
  • Lee, Sin-Jae (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Woo (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2010.08.04
  • Accepted : 2010.12.03
  • Published : 2011.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The purposes of this study were to establish cephalometric norms of Mongolian adults, which have not previously been reported in orthodontic journals, and to compare them with cephalometric norms of Korean adults. Methods: Lateral cephalometric radiographs of 74 Mongolian adults (35 men, 39 women) and 95 Korean adults (52 men, 43 women) with normal occlusions and well-balanced lateral profiles were obtained. The subjects were chosen by orthodontists of the same ethnic background. Forty craniofacial variables were measured, and groups were compared by analysis of covariance. Results: The cephalometric norms for male and female Mongolian and Korean adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced lateral profiles were established. Sexual dimorphism was found in linear skeletal measurements and vertical skeletal relationships. Compared with Korean adults, Mongolian adults had shorter anterior facial height, more prominent chins, and more upright upper incisors. There were few differences in soft tissue measurements. The differences were statistically significant, but their clinical importance may be limited. Conclusions: Cephalometric differences can be considered, but little difference may exist in the orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning of Mongolian and Korean adults.

현재까지 몽골인의 측모두부계측방사선학적 기준치가 문헌 상으로 보고된 바가 없었던 바, 본 연구의 목적은 정상교합과 초화로운 측모를 가진 몽골인을 선별하여 측모두부계측방사선학적 기준치를 제시하고, 이를 같은 기준으로 선별한 한국인의 기준치와 비교하는 것이다. 조화로운 측모를 가진 74명의 몽골인(남자 35명, 여자 39명)과 95명의 한국인(남자 52명, 여자 43명) 성인 정상교합자들의 측모두부계측방사선 사진을 채득하였다. 이들은 해당 민족과 국적의 교정 의사들의 평가로 선별되었다. 40개의 계측치에 대하여 민족별, 성별 평균 및 표준편차를 산출한 후, 그 차이를 ananlysis of covariance (ANCOVA)로 검정하였다. 조화로운 측모를 가진 몽골인과 한국인 남녀 성인 정상교합자의 측모두부방사선학적 기준치를 얻었다. 골격성 선 계측치와 수직적 골격 관계에서 성별 간의 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 몽골인은 한국인에 비하여 짧은 전안면 고경, 돌출된 이부, 설측경사된 상악 전치를 나타내었으나, 대부분의 계측치 간 평균 차이가 적어 임상적 의미는 적었다. 몽골인과 한국인 성인 환자의 교정치료를 위한 진단과 치료계획 시에 유사한 기준을 적용할 수 있을 것이라고 생각되었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Seoul National University Dental Hospital

References

  1. Downs WB. Variations in facial relationships; their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 1948;34:812-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(48)90015-3
  2. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 1953;39:729-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(53)90082-7
  3. Tweed CH. The Frankfort-mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 1954;24:121-69.
  4. Ricketts RM. Planning treatment on the basis of the facial patterns and an estimate of its growth. Angle Orthod 1957;27:14-37.
  5. el-Batouti A, Ogaard B, Bishara SE. Longitudinal cephalometric standards for Norwegians between the ages of 6 and 18 years. Eur J Orthod 1994;16:501-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/16.6.501
  6. Cotton WN, Takano WS, Wong WM. The Downs analysis applied to three other ethnic groups. Angle Orthod 1951;21:213-20.
  7. Cooke MS, Wei SH. A comparative study of southern Chinese and British Caucasian cephalometric standards. Angle Orthod 1989;59:131-8.
  8. Wu J, Hagg U, Rabie AB. Chinese norms of McNamara's cephalometric analysis. Angle Orthod 2007;77:12-20. https://doi.org/10.2319/021606-62R.1
  9. Miyajima K, McNamara JA Jr, Kimura T, Murata S, Iizuka T. Craniofacial structure of Japanese and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:431-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70047-1
  10. Basciftci FA, Uysal T, Buyukerkmen A. Craniofacial structure of Anatolian Turkish adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:366-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.004
  11. Huang WJ, Taylor RW, Dasanayake AP. Determining cephalometric norms for Caucasians and African Americans in Birmingham. Angle Orthod 1998;68:503-11.
  12. Hamdan AM, Rock WP. Cephalometric norms in an Arabic population. J Orthod 2001;28:297-300. https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/28.4.297
  13. Yeong P, Huggare J. Morphology of Singapore chinese. Eur J Orthod 2004;26:605-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/26.6.605
  14. Yang WS. A roentgenocephalometric study of the linear analyses in normal occlusion for Korean. Korean J Orthod 1974;4:7-12.
  15. Lee KS, Chung KR. A cephalometric analysis of Korean adult normal occlusion. Korean J Orthod 1987;17:199-214.
  16. Park IC, Bowman D, Klapper L. A cephalometric study of Korean adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:54-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90229-1
  17. Hwang HS, Kim WS, McNamara JA Jr. Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Angle Orthod 2002;72:72-80.
  18. Malocclusion Report Publication Committee of KAO. The report of cephalometric measurement study of Korean adults with normal occlusion. 1997. p. 1-17.
  19. Georg S, Michalove PA, Ramer AM, Sidwell PJ. Telling general linguists about Altaic. J Linguistics 1999;35:65-98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226798007312
  20. Saha N, Tay JS. Origin of the Koreans: a population genetic study. Am J Phys Anthropol 1992;88:27-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330880104
  21. Chimge NO, Batsuuri J. Interethnic genetic differentiation: HLA class I antigens in the population of Mongolia. Am J Hum Biol 1999;11:603-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(199909/10)11:5<603::AID-AJHB4>3.0.CO;2-C
  22. Kim W, Shin DJ, Harihara S, Kim YJ. Y chromosomal DNA variation in east Asian populations and its potential for inferring the peopling of Korea. J Hum Genet 2000;45:76-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100380050015
  23. Karafet T, Xu L, Du R, Wang W, Feng S, Wells RS, et al. Paternal population history of East Asia: sources, patterns, and microevolutionary processes. Am J Hum Genet 2001;69:615-28. https://doi.org/10.1086/323299
  24. Jin HJ, Kwak KD, Hammer MF, Nakahori Y, Shinka T, Lee JW, et al. Y-chromosomal DNA haplogroups and their implications for the dual origins of the Koreans. Hum Genet 2003;114:27-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-003-1019-0
  25. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.; 1940.
  26. Casko JS, Shepherd WB. Dental and skeletal variation within the range of normal. Angle Orthod 1984;54:5-17.
  27. Kim JY, Lee SJ, Kim TW, Nahm DS, Chang YI. Classification of the skeletal variation in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 2005;75:311-9.
  28. Goldstone JA, Gurr TA, Harff B, Levy MA, Marshall MG, Bates RH, et al. State Failure Task Force Report: Phase III Findings. McLean, VA: Science Applications International Corporation 2000. (Available at: http://globalpolicy.gmu.edu/pitf/. Accessed June 21, 2010)
  29. Del Santo M Jr. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:641-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.025
  30. King L, Harris EF, Tolley EA. Heritability of cephalometric and occlusal variables as assessed from siblings with overt malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:121-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81001-7
  31. Trenouth MJ, Davies PH, Johnson JS. A statistical comparison of three sets of normative data from which to derive standards for craniofacial measurement. Eur J Orthod 1985;7:193-200. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/7.3.193
  32. Alcalde RE, Jinno T, Pogrel MA, Matsumura T. Cephalometric norms in Japanese adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56:129-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90849-7
  33. Pogrel MA. What are normal esthetic values? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;49:963-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(91)90060-Y
  34. Ko SJ, Kim HS, Kim YJ. The influence of gender or culture on determining esthetic facial profile. Korean J Orthod 2001;31:301-9.

Cited by

  1. Le facteur ethnique est-il un indicateur thérapeutique? vol.82, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1051/orthodfr/2011143
  2. Morphological difference of symphysis according to various skeletal types using cone-beam computed tomography vol.30, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2014.30.3.215
  3. Sagittal and Vertical Occlusal Cephalometric Analyses of Pancherz among Malaysian Malays and Malaysian Chinese vol.25, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2485/jhtb.25.403
  4. Assessment of lower incisor alveolar bone width using cone-beam computed tomography images in skeletal Class III adults of different vertical patterns vol.48, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.6.349
  5. Craniofacial and upper airway profile assessment in North Indian patients with obstructive sleep apnea vol.36, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_303_18
  6. Efficiency of ODI and APDI of Kim’s cephalometric analysis in a Latin American population with skeletal open bite vol.24, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.24.3.046-054.oar
  7. Pierre Robin sequence with severe scoliosis in an adult: A case report of clinical and radiological features vol.49, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2019.49.4.323
  8. Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study vol.51, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.126