대한치과교정학회지 (The korean journal of orthodontics)

  • 제41권1호
  • /
  • Pages.16-24
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 2234-7518(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-372X(eISSN)
대한치과교정학회 (The Korean Association Of Orthodontists)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

항미생물제제를 포함한 self-etching primer로 접착한 세라믹 브라켓의 전단 결합 강도

Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded with antimicrobial monomer-containing self-etching primer

  • 권태훈 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과교정학교실) ;
  • 강장미 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과교정학교실) ;
  • 장나영 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과교정학교실) ;
  • 강경화 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과교정학교실)
  • Kwon, Tae-Hun (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kang, Jang-Mi (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Chang, Na-Young (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kang, Kyung-Hwa (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 투고 : 2010.03.04
  • 심사 : 2010.07.16
  • 발행 : 2011.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 세라믹 브라켓의 종류에 따른 항미생물제제를 포함한 self-etching primer의 전단 결합 강도 차이를 평가하고, 접착제 잔류 지수(adhesive remnant index, ARI)를 기록하여 브라켓-접착제의 파절양상을 알아보는 것이다. 인간의 발치된 치아 90개를 세라믹 브라켓의 종류(단결정 혹은 다결정)와 primer의 종류(Transbond XT primer, Transbond Plus SEP, Clearfil Protect Bond)에 따라 임의로 6개 군으로 분류하여 각 군당 15개의 치아를 할당하였다. 전단 결합 강도를 측정 후 치면에 남아 있는 접착제의 양을 평가하였다. 세 종류의 primer 모두에서 다결정 세라믹 브라켓군이 단결정 세라믹 브라켓군보다 전단 결합 강도가 유의하게 높았다 (p < 0.001). 단결정과 다결정 세라믹 브라켓군 모두에서 Transbond XT primer를 이용하여 접착한 군이 Transbond Plus SEP이나 Clearfil Protect Bond를 이용하여 접착한 군보다 전단 결합 강도가 유의하게 높았다 (p < 0.001). 모든 군에서 모든 접착제가 치면에 남아 있거나 90% 이상 남아 있는 브라켓-접착제 계면의 파절이 관찰되었다. 적절한 전단 결합 강도와 파절 양상을 고려하여 단결정 세라믹 브라켓과 self-etching primer 조합이 추천된다.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine (1) the shear bond strength (SBS) of an antimicrobial monomer-containing self-etching primer according to ceramic bracket types and (2) the bracket-adhesive failure mode using an adhesive remnant index (ARI). Methods: A total of 90 extracted human teeth were randomly divided into 6 groups. Each group consisted of one of two ceramic brackets (monocrystalline, polycrystalline) and one of three primers (Transbond XT primer, Transbond Plus SEP, Clearfil Protect Bond) with each group containing 15 specimens. The SBS was measured, and adhesive residues left on the tooth surface were assessed. Results: The SBS of polycrystalline ceramic bracket groups was Significantly higher than that of the monocrystalline ceramic bracket groups (p < 0.001). The SBS of Transbond XT primer groups was significantly higher than those of Transbond Plus SEP groups and Clearfil Protect Bond groups (p < 0.001). All the groups showed bonding failures between the bracket base and adhesive. Conclusions: The combination of a self-etching primer with a monocrystalline bracket is recommended for clinical use, considering its acceptable SBS and mode of failure.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 원광대학교

참고문헌

  1. Bishara SE, Ostby AW, Laffoon J, Warren JJ. Enamel cracks and ceramic bracket failure during debonding in vitro. Angle Orthod 2008;78:1078-83. https://doi.org/10.2319/112007-540.1
  2. Swartz ML. Ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1988;22:82-8.
  3. Bishara SE. Ceramic brackets and the need to develop national standards. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:595-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70212-5
  4. Bishara SE, Fehr DE, Jakobsen JR. A comparative study of the debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, and adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:170-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81007-8
  5. Strobl K, Bahns TL, Willham L, Bishara SE, Stwalley WC. Laser-aided debonding of orthodontic ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:152-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70007-W
  6. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 1982;81:93-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90032-X
  7. Ogaard B, Larsson E, Henriksson T, Birkhed D, Bishara SE. Effects of combined application of antimicrobial and fluoride varnishes in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:28-35. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.114644
  8. Scheie AA, Arneberg P, Krogstad O. Effect of orthodontic treatment on prevalence of Streptococcus mutans in plaque and saliva. Scand J Dent Res 1984;92:211-7.
  9. Tuncer C, Tuncer BB, Ulusoy C. Effect of fluoride-releasing light-cured resin on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:14.e1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.010
  10. Geiger AM, Gorelick L, Gwinnett AJ, Benson BJ. Reducing white spot lesions in orthodontic populations with fluoride rinsing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:403-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70112-N
  11. Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Pistorio A, Sfondrini G. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glassionomer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:30-5. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.111399
  12. Derks A, Katsaros C, Frencken JE, van't Hof MA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Caries-inhibiting effect of preventive measures during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. A systematic review. Caries Res 2004;38:413-20. https://doi.org/10.1159/000079621
  13. Buyukyilmaz T, Ogaard B. Caries-preventive effects of fluoride-releasing materials. Adv Dent Res 1995;9:377-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374950090040601
  14. Rolla G, Melsen B. On the mechanism of the plaque inhibition by chlorhexidine. J Dent Res 1975;54 Spec No B:B57-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345750540022601
  15. Imazato S, Ebi N, Takahashi Y, Kaneko T, Ebisu S, Russell RR. Antibacterial activity of bactericide-immobilized filler for resin-based restoratives. Biomaterials 2003;24:3605-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00217-5
  16. Imazato S, Ebi N, Tarumi H, Russell RR, Kaneko T, Ebisu S. Bactericidal activity and cytotoxicity of antibacterial monomer MDPB. Biomaterials 1999;20:899-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00247-6
  17. Asgari S, Salas A, English J, Powers J. Clinical evaluation of bond failure rates with a new self-etching primer. J Clin Orthod 2002;36:687-9.
  18. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Failure rate of self-ligating and edgewise brackets bonded with conventional acid etching and a self-etching primer: a prospective in vivo study. Angle Orthod 2006;76:119-22.
  19. Bishara SE, Soliman M, Laffoon J, Warren JJ. Effect of antimicrobial monomer-containing adhesive on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2005;75:397-9.
  20. Korbmacher HM, Huck L, Kahl-Nieke B. Fluoride-releasing adhesive and antimicrobial self-etching primer effects on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2006;76:845-50.
  21. Paschos E, Kurochkina N, Huth KC, Hansson CS, Rudzki- Janson I. Failure rate of brackets bonded with antimicrobial and fluoride-releasing, self-etching primer and the effect on prevention of enamel demineralization. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:613-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.016
  22. Bishara SE, Trulove TS. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part I. Background and methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:145-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70008-Z
  23. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TS 11405: 2003(E). Dentistry: Dental materials-testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2003.
  24. Wang WN, Meng CL, Tarng TH. Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:374-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)80019-4
  25. Buyukyilmaz T, Usumez S, Karaman AI. Effect of self-etching primers on bond strength--are they reliable? Angle Orthod 2003;73:64-70.
  26. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:621-4. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.113269
  27. Uysal T, Ustdal A, Kurt G. Evaluation of shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with self-etching primer. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:214-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp035
  28. Reynolds IR, von Fraunhofer JA. Direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth: the relation of adhesive bond strength to gauze mesh size. Br J Orthod 1976;3:91-5. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.3.2.91
  29. Bowen RL, Rodriguez MS. Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure and several restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1962;64:378-87. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1962.0090
  30. Klocke A, Korbmacher HM, Huck LG, Ghosh J, Kahl-Nieke B. Plasma arc curing of ceramic brackets: an evaluation of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:309-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00310-X
  31. Imazato S. Antibacterial properties of resin composites and dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2003;19:449-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00102-1
  32. Ebi N, Imazato S, Noiri Y, Ebisu S. Inhibitory effects of resin composite containing bactericide-immobilized filler on plaque accumulation. Dent Mater 2001;17:485-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00006-9
  33. Artun J, Brobakken BO. Prevalence of carious white spots after orthodontic treatment with multibonded appliances. Eur J Orthod 1986;8:229-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/8.4.229
  34. Arhun N, Arman A, Sesen C, Karabulut E, Korkmaz Y, Gokalp S. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with 3 self-etch adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:547-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.006
  35. Eminkahyagil N, Korkmaz Y, Gokalp S, Baseren M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with newly developed antibacterial self-etch adhesive. Angle Orthod 2005;75:843-8.
  36. Elekdag-Turk S, Isci D, Ozkalayci N, Turk T. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:84-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn067
  37. Martin S, Garcia-Godoy F. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets cemented with a zinc oxide-polyvinyl cement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:615-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70086-9
  38. Pickett KL, Sadowsky PL, Jacobson A, Lacefield W. Orthodontic in vivo bond strength: comparison with in vitro results. Angle Orthod 2001;71:141-8.