Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dynamic response of adjacent structures connected by friction damper

  • Patel, C.C. (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay) ;
  • Jangid, R.S. (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay)
  • Received : 2010.07.05
  • Accepted : 2010.12.14
  • Published : 2011.06.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Dynamic response of two adjacent single degree-of-freedom (SDOF) structures connected with friction damper under base excitation is investigated. The base excitation is modeled as a stationary white-noise random process. As the force-deformation behavior of friction damper is non linear, the dynamic response of connected structures is obtained using the equivalent linearization technique. It is observed that there exists an optimum value of the limiting frictional force of the damper for which the mean square displacement and the mean square absolute acceleration responses of the connected structures attains the minimum value. The close form expressions for the optimum value of damper frictional force and corresponding mean square responses of the coupled undamped structures are derived. These expressions can be used for initial optimal design of the friction damper for connected structures. A parametric study is also carried out to investigate the influence of system parameters such as frequency ratio and mass ratio on the response of the coupled structures. It has been observed that the frequency ratio has significant effect on the performance of the friction damper, whereas the effects of mass ratio are marginal. Finally, the verification of the derived close from expressions is made by correlating the response of connected structures under real earthquake excitations.

Keywords

References

  1. Bertero, V.V. (1985), "Observation of structural pounding", Proceedings of the International Conference on the Maxico Earthquake, ASCE, 264-278.
  2. Bhaskararao, A.V. and Jangid, R.S. (2006a), "Harmonic response of adjacent structures connected with a friction damper", J. Sound Vib., 292, 710-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.08.029
  3. Bhaskararao, A.V. and Jangid, R.S. (2006b), "Seismic response of adjacent buildings connected with friction dampers", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 4, 43-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-005-5410-1
  4. Bhaskararao, A.V. and Jangid, R.S. (2006c), "Seismic analysis of structures connected with friction dampers", Eng. Struct., 28, 690-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.020
  5. Bhaskararao, A.V. and Jangid, R.S. (2007), "Optimum viscous damper for connecting adjacent SDOF structures for harmonic and stationary white-noise random excitations", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36, 563-571. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.636
  6. Constantinou, M.C. and Symans, M.D. (1993), Experimental study of seismic response of buildings with supplemental fluid dampers", Struct. Des. Tall Build., 2, 93-132. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.4320020203
  7. Cremer, L. and Heckl, M. (1973), Structure borne sound, Springer, New York.
  8. Filiatrault, A. and Folz, B. (1992), "Nonlinear earthquake response of structurally interconnected buildings", Can. J. Civil Eng., 18(4), 560-572.
  9. Housner, G.W., Bergman, L., Caughy, T.K., Chassiakos, A.G., Claus, R.O., Masri, S.F., Skelton, R.E., Soong, T.T., Spencer, B.F. and Yao, J.T.P. (1997), "Structural control: past, present and future", J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE, 123, 897-971. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:9(897)
  10. Jangid, R.S. and Banerji, P. (1998), "Effects of isolation damping on stochastic response of structures with non-linear base isolators", Earthq. Spectra, 14, 95-114. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585990
  11. Jangid, R.S. (2008), "Stochastic response of bridges seismically isolated by friction pendulum system", J. Bridge Eng. - ASCE, 13, 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:4(319)
  12. Kasai, K. and Maison, B.F. (1992), "Dynamics of pounding when two buildings collide", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 2, 771-786.
  13. Luco, J.E. and De Barros, F.C.P. (1998), "Optimal damping between two adjacent elastic structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 27, 649-659. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199807)27:7<649::AID-EQE748>3.0.CO;2-5
  14. Mualla, I.H. and Belev, B. (2002), "Performance of steel frames with a new friction damper device under earthquake excitation", Eng. Struct., 24, 365-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00102-X
  15. Ni, Y.Q., Ko, J.M. and Ying, Z.G. (2001), "Random seismic response analysis of adjacent buildings coupled with non-linear hysteretic dampers", J. Sound Vib., 246, 405-417.
  16. Nigam, N.C. (1983), Introduction to random vibrations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  17. Roberts, J.B. and Spanos, P.D. (1990), Random vibration and statistical linearization, Wiley, New York.
  18. Soong, T.T. and Dargush, G.F. (1997), Passive energy dissipation system in structural engineering, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  19. Tsai, C.S., Chen, B. and Pong, W.S. (2003), "Interactive behavior of structures equipped with combined seismic dampers and unbounded foundations", Adv. Struct. Eng., 6, 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1260/136943303769013192
  20. Weidlinger, P. (1996), "Passive structural control with sequential coupling", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 122(9), 1072-1080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:9(1072)
  21. Westermo, B. (1989), "The dynamics of inter-structural connection to prevent pounding", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 18, 687-699. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290180508
  22. Ying, Z.G., Ni, Y.Q. and Ko, J.M. (2003), "Stochastic optimal coupling-control of adjacent building structures", Comput. Struct., 81, 2775-2787. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00332-8
  23. Zhu, H.P. and Iemura, H.A. (2000), "A study of response control on the passive coupling element between two parallel structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 9(4), 383-396. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2000.9.4.383

Cited by

  1. Optimal arrangement of viscoelastic dampers for seismic control of adjacent shear-type structures vol.14, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1200181
  2. Hybrid Control System for Greater Resilience Using Multiple Isolation and Building Connection vol.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2016.00026
  3. Innovative Seismic Response-Controlled System with Shear Wall and Concentrated Dampers in Lower Stories vol.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2017.00057
  4. Efficient solution of the multiple seismic pounding problem using hierarchical substructure techniques 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1525-x
  5. Effect of Non-linearity of Connecting Dampers on Vibration Control of Connected Building Structures vol.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2015.00025
  6. Applicability of a Simplified SDOF Method in Longitudinal Deck-Pier Poundings of Simply Supported Girder Bridges vol.2016, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3569674
  7. Smart passive control of buildings with higher redundancy and robustness using base-isolation and inter-connection vol.4, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.6.649
  8. Analysis and mitigation of seismic pounding of a slender R/C bell tower vol.71, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.006
  9. Automatic generation of smart earthquake-resistant building system: Hybrid system of base-isolation and building-connection vol.2, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00069
  10. A Simple Response Evaluation Method for Base-Isolation Building-Connection Hybrid Structural System under Long-Period and Long-Duration Ground Motion vol.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2018.00002
  11. Dual Control High-rise Building for Robuster Earthquake Performance vol.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2017.00012
  12. Nonlinear Modeling and Mitigation of Seismic Pounding between R/C Frame Buildings vol.19, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2014.984370
  13. Seismic performance of steel plate slit-friction hybrid dampers vol.136, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.05.005
  14. Optimal distribution of friction dampers for seismic retrofit of a reinforced concrete moment frame vol.20, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216683197
  15. Seismic performance evaluation of moment frames with slit-friction hybrid dampers vol.9, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.6.1291
  16. Effectiveness of passive response control devices in buildings under earthquake and wind during design life vol.15, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1547768
  17. Telescopic columns as a new base isolation system for vibration control of high-rise buildings vol.3, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.6.853
  18. The effect of mainshock-aftershock on the residual displacement of buildings equipped with cylindrical frictional damper vol.12, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.5.515
  19. The seismic reliability of two connected SMRF structures vol.13, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.2.151
  20. Effects of Hysteresis and Negative Stiffness on Seismic Response Reduction: A Case Study Based on the 1999 Athens, Greece Earthquake vol.4, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2018.00023
  21. A Simple Critical Response Evaluation Method for Base-Isolation Building-Connection Hybrid System Under Double Impulse as Representative of Near-Fault Ground Motion vol.7, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.790584