DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of preconsolidation stress by shear wave velocity

  • Yoon, Hyung-Koo (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Changho (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Ki (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kookmin University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Sub (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University)
  • Received : 2010.06.30
  • Accepted : 2010.08.25
  • Published : 2011.04.25

Abstract

The behaviors of saturated soils such as compressibility and permeability are distinguished by preconsolidation stress. Preconsolidation stress becomes an important design parameter in geotechnical structures. The goal of this study is to introduce a new method for the evaluation of preconsolidation stress based on the shear wave velocity at small strain, using Busan, Incheon, and Gwangyang clays in Korea. Standard consolidation tests are conducted by using an oedometer cell equipped with bender elements. The preconsolidation stresses estimated by shear wave velocity are compared with those evaluated by the Casagrande, constrained modulus, work, and logarithmic methods. The preconsolidation stresses estimated by the shear wave velocity produce very similar values to those evaluated by the Onitsuka method (one of the logarithmic methods), which yields an almost real preconsolidation stress. This study shows that the shear wave velocity method provides a reliable method for evaluating preconsolidation stress and can be used as a complementary method.

Keywords

References

  1. ASTM D2435 (2004), "Standard test method for one-dimensional consolidation properties of soils using incremental loading", Annual Book of ASTM Standard.
  2. Becker, D.E., Crooks, J.H.A., Been, K. and Jefferies, M.G. (1987), "Work as a criterion for determining in situ and yield stresses in clays", Can. Geotech. J., 24(4), 49-564.
  3. Burland, J.B. (1990), "On the compressibility and shear strength of natural clays", Geotechnique, 40(3), 329-378. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1990.40.3.329
  4. Burmister, D.M. (1951), "The applications of controlled test methods in consolidation testing", Proceedings of the Symposium on Consolidation Testing of Soils., Special Technical Publication.
  5. Butterfield, R. (1979), "A natural compression law for soils (an advance on e-logp')", Geotechnique, 29(4), 469-480. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1979.29.4.469
  6. Casagrande, A. (1936), "The determination of the pre-consolidation load and its practical significance", Proceedings of the 1st International Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Conference, Cambridgd, Mass., Ed., Casagrande.
  7. Grozic, J.L.H., Lunne, T. and Pande, S. (2003), "An oedometer test study on the preconsolidation stress of glaciomarine clays", Can. Geotech. J., 40(5), 857-872. https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-043
  8. Houlsby, G.T. and Sharma, R.S. (1999), "A conceptual model for the yielding and consolidation of clays", Geotechnique, 49(4), 491-501. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1999.49.4.491
  9. Imai, G. (1979), "Development of new consolidation test procedure using seepage force", Soils Found., 19(3), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.19.3_45
  10. Janbu, N. (1969), "The resistance concept applied to deformation of soils", Proceedings of the 7th International Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Conference, Mexico City, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.
  11. Jose, B.T., Sridharan, A. and Abraham, B.M. (1989), "Log-log method for determination of preconsolidation pressure", Geotech. Testing J. ASTM, 12(3), 230-237. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10974J
  12. Khan, P.A, Madhav, M.R. and Reddy, E.S. (2010), "Consolidation of thick clay layer by radial flow non-linear theory", Geomech. Eng., 2(2), 157-160. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2010.2.2.157
  13. Kwon, T.H. and Cho, G.C. (2005), "Smart geophysical characterization of particulate materials in a laboratory", Smart Struct. Syst., 1(2), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2005.1.2.217
  14. Lee, C., Lee, J.S., Lee, W. and Cho, T.H. (2008), "Experiment setup for shear wave and electrical resistance measurements in an oedometer", Geotech. Test. J., 31(2), 149-156.
  15. Lee, J.S. and Santamarina, J.C., (2005), "Bender elements: performance and signal interpretation", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 131(9), 1063-1070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:9(1063)
  16. Lee, J.S., Fernandez, A.L. and Santamarina, J.C. (2005), "S-wave velocity tomography: small-scale laboratory application." Geotech. Test. J., 28(4), 336-344.
  17. Nagaraj, T.S. and Srinivasa Murthy, B.R. (1983), "Rationalization of Skempton's compressibility equation", Geotechnique, 33(4), 433-443. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1983.33.4.433
  18. Negussey, D. and Vaid, Y.P. (1995), "Estimating maximum past pressures in clay", Proceedings of the International Symposium on Compression and Consolidation of Clayey soils, Hiroshima.
  19. Onitsuka, K., Hong, Z., Hara, Y. and Yoshitake, S. (1995), "Interpretation of oedometer test data for natural clays", Soils Found., 35(3), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.35.61
  20. Schmertmann, J.H. (1955), "The undisturbed consolidation behavior of clay", TAS Civil Engineers, 20, 1201-1233.
  21. Shang, J.Q., Tang, Q.H. and Xu, Y.Q. (2009), "Consolidation of marine clay using electrical vertical drains", Geomech. Eng. 1(4), 275-289. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2009.1.4.275
  22. Sridharan, A., Abraham, B.M. and Jose, B.T. (1991), "Improved technique for estimation of preconsolidation pressure", Geotechnique, 41(2), 263-268. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1991.41.2.263
  23. Wanatowski, D., Chu, J. and Gan, C.L. (2009), "Compressibility of Changi sand in K0 consolidation", Geomech. Eng., 1(3), 241-257. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2009.1.3.241
  24. Wang, L.B. and Frost, J.D. (2004), "Dissipated strain energy method for determining preconsolidation pressure", Can. Geotech. J., 41(4), 760-768. https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-013
  25. Zeng, X. (2006), "Applications of piezoelectric sensors in geotechnical engineering", Smart Struct. Syst., 2(3), 237-251. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2006.2.3.237

Cited by

  1. Theoretical relationship between elastic wave velocity and electrical resistivity vol.116, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.02.025
  2. Application of shear wave velocity for evaluation of equivalent radius of penetrometers vol.86, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.07.009
  3. Deformation of “tunable” clay–polymer composites vol.101, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2014.08.014
  4. Estimation of Consolidation in Soft Clay by Field Velocity Probe vol.23, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9720/kseg.2013.4.511
  5. Characterization of Shear Waves in Busan New Port Clay: Estimation of the Coefficients of Shear Wave Velocity vol.23, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9720/kseg.2013.4.503
  6. Evaluation of the freezing–thawing effect in sand–silt mixtures using elastic waves and electrical resistivity vol.113, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.02.004
  7. Correlations between Shear Wave Velocity and Geotechnical Parameters for Jiangsu Clays of China pp.1420-9136, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-2011-x
  8. Global semi-empirical relationships for correlating soil unit weight with shear wave velocity by void-ratio function vol.55, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0226
  9. Use of the dilatometer test to estimate the maximum shear modulus of normally consolidated Busan clay pp.1521-0618, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2018.1458927
  10. Study of Activation Energy in Soil through Elastic Wave Velocity and Electrical Resistivity vol.16, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.08.0073
  11. Settlement prediction for footings based on stress history from VS measurements vol.20, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.20.5.371
  12. Relationship between Shear-Wave Velocity and Undrained Shear Strength of Peat vol.146, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002298
  13. Haar Wavelet Transform for Arrival Time Identification in Bender Element Tests vol.43, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj20180400
  14. Response of Transitional Mixtures Retaining Memory of In-Situ Overburden Pressure Monitored Using Electromagnetic and Piezo Crystal Sensors vol.21, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21072570