DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A method for evaluation of longitudinal joint connections of decked precast concrete girder bridges

  • Smith, Matthew Z. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological University) ;
  • Li, Yue (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological University) ;
  • Bulleit, William M. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological University)
  • Received : 2009.08.30
  • Accepted : 2011.08.17
  • Published : 2011.11.10

Abstract

As bridge conditions in the United States continue to deteriorate, rapid bridge replacement procedures are needed. Decked precast prestressed concrete (DPPC) girders are used for rapid bridge construction because the bridge deck is precast with the girders eliminating the need for a cast-in-place slab. One of the concerns with using DPPC girders as a bridge construction option is the durability of the longitudinal joints between girders. The objectives of this paper were to propose a method to use a spring element modeling procedure for representing welded steel connector assemblies between adjacent girders in DPPC girder bridges, perform a preliminary study of bridge performance under multiple loading scenarios and bridge configurations, and discuss model flexibility for accommodating future field data for model verification. The spring elements have potential to represent the contribution of joint grout materials by altering the spring stiffness.

Keywords

References

  1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2006), Interim AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 3rd edition, Washington, D.C.
  2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2007), AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 4th edition, Washington, D.C.
  3. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2009), "Report Card for America's Infrastructure", < http://www.asce.org/reportcard/2009/grades.cfm>
  4. Boresi, A.P. and Schmidt, R.J. (2002), Advanced Mechanics of Materials, John Wiley & Sons Publishing.
  5. Cai, C.S. and Shahawy, M. (2004), "Predicted and measured performance of prestressed concrete bridges", J. Bridge Eng., 9(1), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:1(4)
  6. Cai, C.S., Shahawy, M. and Peterman, R.J. (2002), "Effect of diaphragms on load distribution in prestressed concrete bridges", Transportation Research Record, 1814, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
  7. Chaudhury, S. and Ma, Z. (2004), "Effect of connections between adjacent units on decked precast/prestressed concrete girder bridges", PCI National Bridge Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, February.
  8. Gergely, J., Overcash, G.L., Mock, J.B., Clark, C.M. and Bailey, K.G. (2007), "Evaluation of design and construction of HPC deck girder bridge in stanly county, North Carolina", Report No. FHWA/NC/2006-18, Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte, Civil Engineering Dept., Charlotte, NC.
  9. GTStrudl (2006), GTStrudl Version 29, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
  10. Hieber, D.G., Wacker, J.M., Eberhard, M.O. and Stanton, J.F. (2005), State-of-the-Art Report on Precast Concrete Systems for Rapid Construction of Bridges, Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC), Univ. of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  11. Jones, H.L. and Boaz, I.B. (1986), "Skewed discretely connected multi-beam bridges", J. Struct. Eng., 112(2), 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:2(257)
  12. Ma, Z.J., Chaudhury, S., Milliam, J.L. and Hulsey, J.L. (2007), "Field test and 3D FE modeling of decked bulb-Tee bridges", J. Bridge Eng., 12(3), 306-314. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:3(306)
  13. Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) (2005), "Bridge Design Manual",
  14. Millam, J.L. and Ma, Z. (2005), "Single lane live load distribution factor for decked precast, prestressed concrete girder bridges", Transportation Research Record, 1928, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
  15. Pipkorn, T.M. (2006), "Development of rapid construction solutions using prefabricated prestressed concrete systems", MS thesis, Michigan Technological Univ., Houghton, MI.
  16. Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI) (2007), State of the Art of Precast/Prestressed Adjacent Member Bridges, Chicago, IL.
  17. PSBeam (2000), PSBeam Version 2.00, Eriksson Technologies, Inc., Temple Terrace, FL.
  18. Smith, M.Z. (2007), "Analysis of longitudinal joint connections for decked precast prestressed concrete girder bridges", MS thesis, Michigan Technological Univ., Houghton, MI.

Cited by

  1. Modelling and integrity assessment of shear connectors in precast cast-in-situ concrete bridges vol.42, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.42.1.055
  2. Flexural analysis of transverse joints of prefabricated T-girder bridge superstructure vol.77, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.77.1.089