DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nonlinear aerodynamic stability analysis of orthotropic membrane structures with large amplitude

  • Zheng, Zhoulian (College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University) ;
  • Xu, Yunping (College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University) ;
  • Liu, Changjiang (College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University) ;
  • He, Xiaoting (College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University) ;
  • Song, Weiju (College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University)
  • Received : 2010.06.14
  • Accepted : 2010.10.25
  • Published : 2011.02.25

Abstract

The aerodynamic stability of orthotropic tensioned membrane structures with rectangular plane is theoretically studied under the uniform ideal potential flow. The aerodynamic force acting on the membrane surface is determined by the potential flow theory in fluid mechanics and the thin airfoil theory in aerodynamics. Then, based on the large amplitude theory and the D'Alembert's principle, the interaction governing equation of wind-structure is established. Under the circumstances of single mode response, the Bubnov-Galerkin approximate method is applied to transform the complicated interaction equation into a system of second order nonlinear differential equation with constant coefficients. Through judging the stability of the system characteristic equation, the critical divergence instability wind velocity is determined. Finally, from different parametric analysis, we can conclude that it has positive significance to consider the characteristics of orthotropic and large amplitude for preventing the instability destruction of structures.

Keywords

References

  1. Attar, P.J. and Dowell, E.H. (2005), "A reduced order system ID approach to the modeling of nonlinear structural behavior in aeroelasticity", J. Fluid Struct., 21, 531-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2005.08.012
  2. Bingnan, S., Guodong, M. and Wenjuan, L. (2003), "Wind induced coupling dynamic response of closed membrane structures", Proceeding of Eleventh International Conference on Wind Engineering, Sanya, Hainan, December.
  3. Dowell, E.H. (1970), "Panel flutter: A review of the aeroelastic stability of panel and shells", AIAA J., 8(3), 385-399. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.5680
  4. Forsching, H.W. (1980), Principles of Aeroelasticity, Shanghai Science & Technology Press, Shanghai. (in Chinese)
  5. Ivovich, V.A. and Pokrovskii, L.N. (1991), Dynamic Analysis of Suspended Roof Systems, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam.
  6. Kawakita, S., Bienkiewicz, B. and Cermak, J.E. (1992), "Aerolelastic model study of suspended cable roof", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 42, 1459-1470. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90153-2
  7. Kornecki, A., Dowell, E.H. and O'Brien, J. (1976), "On the aeroelastic instability of two-dimensional panels in uniform incompressible flow", J. Sound Vib., 47(2), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(76)90715-X
  8. Li, Q.X. and Sun, B.N. (2006), "Wind-induced aerodynamic instability analysis of the closed membrane roofs", J. Vib. Eng., 19(3), 346-353.
  9. Minarni, H., Okuda, Y. and Kawamura, S. (1993), "Experimental studies on the flutter behavior of membranes in a wind tunnel", Space Struct., 4, 935-945.
  10. Miyake, A., Yoshimura, T. and Makino, M. (1992), "Aerodynamic instability of suspended roof modals", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 42, 1471-1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90154-3
  11. Scott, R.C., Bartels, R.E. and Kandil, O.A. (2007), "An aeroelastic analysis of a thin flexible membrane", Proceedings of the 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, April.
  12. Shin, C.H., Kim, W.S. and Chung, J.T. (2004), "Free in-plane vibration of an axially moving membrane", J. Sound Vib., 272(1-2), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00323-7
  13. Stanford, B., Ifju, P., Albertani, R. and Shyy, W. (2008), "Fixed membrane wings for micro air vehicles: Experimental characterization, numerical modeling, and tailoring", Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 44(4), 258-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.03.001
  14. Stanford, B., Sytsma, M., Albertani, R., Viieru, D., Shyy, W. and Ifju, P. (2007), "Static aeroelastic model validation of membrane micro air vehicle wings", AIAA J., 45(12), 2828-2837. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.30003
  15. Sygulski, R. (1994), "Dynamic analysis of open membrane structures interaction with air", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 37(11), 1807-1823. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620371103
  16. Sygulski, R. (1994), "Dynamic analysis of open membrane structures interaction with air", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 37(11), 1807-1823. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620371103
  17. Uematsu, Y. and Uchiyama, K. (1986), "Aeroelastic behavior of an H.P.shaped suspended roof", Proceedings of the IASS Symposium on Membrane Structures and Space Frame, Osaka, May.
  18. Yang, Q.S. and Liu, R.X. (2006), "Studies on aerodynamic stability of membrane structures", Eng. Mech., 23(9), 18-24.
  19. Zheng, Z.L., Liu, C.J., He, X.T. and Chen, S.L. (2009), "Free vibration analysis of rectangular Orthotropic Membranes in Large Deflection", Math. Probl. Eng., Article ID 634362, doi:10.1155/2009/634362.

Cited by

  1. Aerodynamic Stability Analysis of Geometrically Nonlinear Orthotropic Membrane Structure with Hyperbolic Paraboloid vol.137, pp.11, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000278
  2. Power series solution of circular membrane under uniformly distributed loads: investigation into Hencky transformation vol.45, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.45.5.631
  3. Nonlinear wind-induced aerodynamic stability of orthotropic saddle membrane structures vol.164, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.02.006
  4. Nonlinear wind-induced instability of orthotropic plane membrane structures vol.25, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2017.25.5.415
  5. Additional Mass: Orthotropic Membrane Material with Four Sides Fixed in Air Flow vol.8, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2020.86074
  6. Effect of Geometric Nonlinearity on Membrane Roof Stability in Air Flow vol.2020, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2305145