Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제37권2호
  • /
  • Pages.149-162
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A comparative study for beams on elastic foundation models to analysis of mode-I delamination in DCB specimens

  • Shokrieh, Mahmood Mehrdad (Composite Research Laboratory, Center of Excellence in Solid Mechanics and Dynamics, Mechanical Engineering Department, Iran University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Heidari-Rarani, Mohammad (Composite Research Laboratory, Center of Excellence in Solid Mechanics and Dynamics, Mechanical Engineering Department, Iran University of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2010.01.16
  • 심사 : 2010.09.01
  • 발행 : 2011.01.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The aim of this research is a comprehensive review and evaluation of beam theories resting on elastic foundations that used to model mode-I delamination in multidirectional laminated composite by DCB specimen. A compliance based approach is used to calculate critical strain energy release rate (SERR). Two well-known beam theories, i.e. Euler-Bernoulli (EB) and Timoshenko beams (TB), on Winkler and Pasternak elastic foundations (WEF and PEF) are considered. In each case, a closed-form solution is presented for compliance versus crack length, effective material properties and geometrical dimensions. Effective flexural modulus ($E_{fx}$) and out-of-plane extensional stiffness ($E_z$) are used in all models instead of transversely isotropic assumption in composite laminates. Eventually, the analytical solutions are compared with experimental results available in the literature for unidirectional ($[0^{\circ}]_6$) and antisymmetric angle-ply ($[{\pm}30^{\circ}]_5$, and $[{\pm}45^{\circ}]_5$) lay-ups. TB on WEF is a simple model that predicts more accurate results for compliance and SERR in unidirectional laminates in comparison to other models. TB on PEF, in accordance with Williams (1989) assumptions, is too stiff for unidirectional DCB specimens, whereas in angle-ply DCB specimens it gives more reliable results. That it shows the effects of transverse shear deformation and root rotation on SERR value in composite DCB specimens.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Andersons, J. and Konig, M. (2004), "Dependence of fracture toughness of composite laminates on interface ply orientations and delamination growth direction", Compos. Sci. Technol., 64(13), 2139-2152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.03.007
  2. ASTM D5528 (2001), Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites.
  3. Bathias, C. and Laksimi, A. (1985), "Delamination threshold and loading effect in fiber glass epoxy composite", ASTM Special Technical Publication, 217-237.
  4. Benzeggagh, M.L., Gong, X.J., Laksimi, A. and Roelandt, J.M. (1991), "On the Mode I delamination test and the importance of laminate lay-ups", Polym. Eng. Sci., 31(17), 1286-1292. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760311709
  5. Davidson, B.D., Krüger, R. and König M. (1996), "Effect of stacking sequence on energy release rate distributions in multi-directional DCB and ENF specimens", Eng. Fract. Mech., 55(4), 557-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(96)00037-9
  6. Ewalds, H.L. and Wanhill, R.J.H. (1989), Fracture Mechanics, Edward Arnold, London.
  7. Gordnian K., Hadavinia H., Mason, P.J. and Madenci, E. (2008), "Determination of fracture energy and tensile cohesive strength in Mode I delamination of angle-ply laminated composites", Compos. Struct., 82(4), 577- 586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.02.008
  8. Hamed, M.A., Nosier, A. and Farrahi, G.H. (2006) "Separation of delamination modes in composite beams with symmetric delaminations", Mater. Des., 27(10), 900-910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2005.03.006
  9. Hetenyi, M. (1946), Beams on Elastic Foundation, The university of Michigan press, USA.
  10. Hyer, M.W. and Knott, T.W. (1994), "Analysis of end-fitting induced strains in axially loaded glass-epoxy cylinders", Composite Structures for SMES Plants (NISTIR5024), (Eds. R.P. Reed and J.D. McColskey), Report to Defense Nuclear Agency from Materials Reliability Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO, NISTIR 5024.
  11. Irwin, G.R. and Kies, J.A. (1954), "Critical energy release rate analysis of fracture strength", Weld Research Supply, 33, 193-198.
  12. Kanninen, M.F. (1973), "An augmented double cantilever beam model for studying crack propagation and arrest", Int. J. Fract., 9(1), 83-91.
  13. Kondo, K. (1995), "Analysis of double cantilever beam specimen", Adv. Compos. Mater., 4(4), 355-366. https://doi.org/10.1163/156855195X00203
  14. Li, S., Wang, J. and Thouless, M.D. (2004), "The effects of shear on delamination in layered materials", J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 52(1), 193-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(03)00070-X
  15. Olsson, R.A. (1992), "A simplified improved beam analysis of the DCB specimen", Compos. Sci. Technol., 43(4), 329-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(92)90056-9
  16. Ozdil, F. and Carlsson, L.A. (1999), "Beam analysis of angle-ply laminate DCB specimens", Compos. Sci. Technol., 59(2), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00069-4
  17. Prasad, B.K.R. and Kumar, D.V.T.G.P. (2009), "Fracture behavior of multidirectional DCB specimen: Higherorder beam theories", J. Eng. Mech., 135(10), 1119-1128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:10(1119)
  18. Reddy, J.N. (1999), Theory and Analysis of Elastic Plates, Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia.
  19. Shirima, L.M. and Giger, M.W. (1992), "Timoshenko beam element resting on two-parameter elastic foundation", J. Eng. Mech., 118(2), 280-295. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:2(280)
  20. Tsai, S.W. (1980), Introduction to Composite Materials, Technomic Publishing Company.
  21. Wang, C.M., Reddy, J.N. and Lee, K.H. (2000), Shear Deformable Beams and Plates, Elsevier science Ltd.
  22. Weatherby, J.R. (1982), "Evaluation of energy release rates in unidirectional double cantilevered beam fracture specimens", MSc Thesis, Texas A&M University.
  23. Whitney, J.M. (1985), "Stress analysis of the double cantilever beam specimen", Compos. Sci. Technol., 23(3), 201-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(85)90018-1
  24. Williams, J.G. (1989), "End corrections for orthotropic DCB specimens", Compos. Sci. Technol., 35(4), 367-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(89)90058-4
  25. Yavari, A., Sarkani, S. and Reddy, J.N. (2001), "Generalized solutions of beams with jump discontinuities on elastic foundations", Appl. Mecha., 71(9), 625-639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004190100169

피인용 문헌

  1. Exact Stiffness for Beams on Kerr-Type Foundation: The Virtual Force Approach vol.2013, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/626287
  2. Analysis of the DCB test of angle-ply laminates including residual stresses 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.03.010
  3. Influence of curved delamination front on toughness of multidirectional DCB specimens vol.94, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.11.035
  4. Displacement-controlled crack growth in double cantilever beam specimen: A comparative study of different models vol.231, pp.15, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406216642474
  5. Interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional DCB specimens: A novel theoretical approach vol.31, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.08.012
  6. Fracture analysis of finite length angle-ply composite double cantilever beam specimens pp.2041-2983, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406218764518
  7. Nonlinear Winkler-based Beam Element with Improved Displacement Shape Functions vol.17, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-1606-0
  8. Characterizing the damage mechanisms in mode II delamination in glass/epoxy composite using acoustic emission vol.67, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.67.5.545
  9. Nonlinear flexibility-based beam element on Winkler-Pasternak foundation vol.24, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2021.24.4.371
  10. Damage diagnosis and prognosis in composite double cantilever beam coupons by particle filtering and surrogate modelling vol.20, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720960067
  11. Direct measurement of rate-dependent mode I and mode II traction-separation laws for cohesive zone modeling of laminated glass vol.279, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114759