Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제11권1호
  • /
  • Pages.77-91
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Experimental evaluation on the seismic performance of steel knee braced frame structures with energy dissipation mechanism

  • Hsu, H.L. (Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Central University) ;
  • Juang, J.L. (Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Central University) ;
  • Chou, C.H. (Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Central University)
  • 투고 : 2010.06.28
  • 심사 : 2010.12.12
  • 발행 : 2011.01.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study experimentally evaluated the seismic performance of steel knee braced frame structures with energy dissipation mechanism. A series of cyclic load tests were conducted on the steel moment resisting frames and the proposed knee braced frames. Test results validated that the demand in the beam-to-column connection designs was alleviated by the proposed design method. Test results also showed that the strength and stiffness of the proposed design were effectively enhanced. Comparisons in energy dissipation between the steel moment resisting frames and the steel knee braced frames further justified the applicability of the proposed method.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE)

참고문헌

  1. ABAQUS (2006), "ABAQUS analysis user's manual", ABAQUS Inc.
  2. Abdalla, K. M., Abu-Farsakh, G. A. R. and Barakat, S. A. (2007), "Experimental investigation of force-distribution in high-strength bolts in extended end-plate connections", Steel. Compos. Struct., 7(2), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2007.7.2.087
  3. AISC (2005), "Seismic provisions for steel buildings", AISC/ANSI Standard 341-05, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.
  4. Cavdar, O., Bayraktar, A., Cavdar, A. and Kartal, M. E. (2009), "Stochastic finite element analysis of structural systems with partially restrained connections subjected to seismic loads", Steel. Compos. Struct., 9(6), 499-518. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2009.9.6.499
  5. Ciutina, A. L. and Dubina, D. (2006), "Seismic behaviour of steel beam-to-column joints with column web stiffening", Steel. Compos. Struct., 6(6), 493-512. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2006.6.6.493
  6. Kim, T., Whittaker, A. S., Gilani, A. S. J., Bertero, V. V. and Takhirov, S. M. (2002), "Cover-plate and flangeplate steel moment-resisting connections", J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE, 128(4), 484-482.
  7. Kim, J. and Park, J. (2008), "Design of steel moment frames considering progressive collapse", Steel. Compos. Struct., 8(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2008.8.1.085
  8. Lee, K. and Bruneau, M. (2005), "Energy dissipation demand of compression members in concentrically braced frames", Steel. Compos. Struct., 5(5), 345-358. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2005.5.5.345
  9. Lee, C. H., Jeon, S. W., Kim, J. H. and Uang, C. M. (2005), "Effects of panel zone strength and beam web connection method on seismic performance of reduced beam section steel moment connections", J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE, 131(12), 1854-1865. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1854)
  10. Lehman, D. E., Roeder, C. W., Herman, D., Johnson, S. and Kotulka, B. (2008), "Improved seismic performance of gusset plate connections", J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE, 134(6), 890-901. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:6(890)
  11. Longo, A., Montuori, R. and Piluso, V. (2008), "Plastic design of seismic resistant V-braced frames," J. Earthq. Engng., 12(8), 1246-1266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802211867
  12. Martinelli L., Mulas M.G., and Perotti F. (1996), "The seismic response of concentrically braced moment resisting steel frames," Earthq. Engng. Struct. Dyn., 25(11), 1275-1299. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199611)25:11<1275::AID-EQE616>3.0.CO;2-U
  13. Pucinotti, R. (2006), "Cyclic mechanical model of semirigid top and seat and double web angle connections", Steel. Compos. Struct., 6(2), 139-157. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2006.6.2.139
  14. Remennikov, A. M. and Walpole, W. R. (1997), "Analytical prediction of seismic behavior for concentricallybraced steel systems", Earthq. Engng. Struct. Dyn., 26(8), 859-874. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199708)26:8<859::AID-EQE684>3.0.CO;2-9
  15. Saravanan, M., Arul Jayachandran, S., Marimuthu, V. and Prabha, P. (2009), "Advanced analysis of cyclic behaviour of plane steel frames with semi-rigid connections", Steel. Compos. Struct., 9(4), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2009.9.4.381
  16. Tremblay, R., Archambault, M. H. and Filiatrault, A. (2003), "Seismic response of concentrically braced steel frames made with rectangular hollow bracing members", J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE, 129(12), 1626-1636. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:12(1626)
  17. Tsai, K.C. and Popov, E.P. (1990), "Seismic panel zone on elastic story drift in steel moment resistance frames," J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE, 116(12), 3285-3301. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:12(3285)
  18. Uriz, P., Filippou, F. C. and Mahin, S. A. (2008), "Model for cyclic inelastic buckling of steel braces", J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE, 134(4), 619-628. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:4(619)
  19. Vu, A. Q. and Leon, R. T. (2008), "Vibration analysis of steel frames with semi-rigid connections on an elastic foundation", Steel. Compos. Struct., 8(4), 265-280. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2008.8.4.265
  20. Yoo, J. H., Lehman, D. E. and Roeder, C. W. (2008), "Influence of connection design parameters on the seismic performance of braced frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 64(6), 607-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.11.005
  21. Yoo, J. H., Roeder, C. W. and Lehman, D. E. (2009), "Simulated behavior of multi-story X-braced frames", Engng. Struct., 31(1), 182-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.019

피인용 문헌

  1. Evaluation of the seismic performance of off-centre bracing system with ductile element in steel frames vol.12, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2012.12.5.445
  2. Seismic performance of steel frames with controlled buckling mechanisms in knee braces vol.107, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.01.010
  3. Hysteretic behaviour of dissipative bolted fuses for earthquake resistant steel frames vol.85, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.02.016
  4. Comparison of nonlinear behavior of steel moment frames accompanied with RC shear walls or steel bracings vol.22, pp.14, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.751
  5. Numerical comparison of the seismic performance of steel rings in off-centre bracing system and diagonal bracing system vol.19, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.4.917
  6. Evaluating the performance of OBS-C-O in steel frames under monotonic load vol.8, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.3.699
  7. Study of the seismic performance of steel frames in the elliptic bracing vol.18, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2016.16858
  8. Energy dissipation system for earthquake protection of cable-stayed bridge towers vol.5, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.6.657
  9. Experimental study on seismic performance of partial penetration welded steel beam-column connections with different fillet radii vol.17, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.17.6.851
  10. A fuzzy system for evaluation of deteriorated marine steel structures vol.32, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-161411
  11. Experimental and analytical investigations on seismic behavior of ductile steel knee braced frames vol.16, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.16.1.001
  12. Hysteretic behavior of dissipative welded fuses for earthquake resistant composite steel and concrete frames vol.14, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2013.14.6.547
  13. Evaluating the seismic performance of off-centre bracing system with circular element in optimum place vol.14, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-2009-x
  14. On the Evaluation of the Use of EKBs to Improve Seismic Performance of Steel Frames vol.18, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0303-8
  15. Seismic design of steel frames using multi-objective optimization vol.45, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.45.2.211
  16. Cyclic testing of innovative two-level control system: Knee brace & vertical link in series in chevron braced steel frames vol.64, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.64.3.301
  17. Seismic performance evaluation of buckling restrained braced frames (BRBF) using incremental nonlinear dynamic analysis method (IDA) vol.13, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.6.531
  18. Evaluation of seismic criteria of built-up special concentrically braced frames vol.29, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.29.1.023
  19. Experimental and numerical evaluation of innovated T-resisting frames with haunched horizontal plate girders vol.23, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219898082
  20. Experimental and numerical evaluation of an innovative diamond-scheme bracing system equipped with a yielding damper vol.36, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.36.2.197
  21. Evaluation of cyclic performance of a novel bracing system equipped with a circular energy dissipater vol.28, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.007
  22. Seismic analysis of high-rise steel frame building considering irregularities in plan and elevation vol.39, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.39.1.065
  23. Experimental investigation of a new lateral bracing system called OGrid under cyclic loading vol.35, pp.None, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.11.015