DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Stochastic design charts for bearing capacity of strip footings

  • Shahin, Mohamed A. (Department of Civil Engineering, Curtin University) ;
  • Cheung, Eric M. (Mainroads Western Australia)
  • Received : 2010.10.06
  • Accepted : 2011.05.17
  • Published : 2011.06.25

Abstract

Traditional design methods of bearing capacity of shallow foundations are deterministic in the sense that they do not explicitly consider the inherent uncertainty associated with the factors affecting bearing capacity. To account for such uncertainty, available deterministic methods rather employ a fixed global factor of safety that may lead to inappropriate bearing capacity predictions. An alternative stochastic approach is essential to provide a more rational estimation of bearing capacity. In this paper, the likely distribution of predicted bearing capacity of strip footings subjected to vertical loads is obtained using a stochastic approach based on the Monte Carlo simulation. The approach accounts for the uncertainty associated with the soil shear strength parameters: cohesion, c, and friction angle, ${\phi}$, and the cross correlation between c and ${\phi}$. A set of stochastic design charts that assure target reliability levels of 90% and 95%, are developed for routine use by practitioners. The charts negate the need for a factor of safety and provide a more reliable indication of what the actual bearing capacity might be.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdel Massih, D.Y., Soubra, A. and Low, B.K. (2008), "Reliability-based analysis and design of strip footings against bearing capacity failure", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 134(7), 917-928. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:7(917)
  2. Baecher, G.B. and Christian, J.T. (2003), Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, England.
  3. Basheer, I.A. and Najjar, Y.M. (1998), "Charts for probabilistic design of strip footings in cohesionless soils", Geotech. Geological Eng., 16(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008893728855
  4. Cherubini, C. (1990), "A closed-form probabilistic solution for evaluating the bearing capacity of shallow foundations", Can. Geotech. J., 27, 526-529. https://doi.org/10.1139/t90-067
  5. Cherubini, C. (2000), "Reliability evaluation of shallow foundation bearing capacity on c', $\varphi$' soils", Can. Geotech. J., 37(1), 264-269.
  6. Easa, S.M. (1992), "Exact probabilistic solution of two-parameter bearing capacity for shallow foundations", Can. Geotech. J., 29(5), 867-870. https://doi.org/10.1139/t92-094
  7. Fenton, G.A. and Griffiths, D.V. (2003), "Bearing capacity prediction of spatially random c-$\varphi$ soils", Can. Geotech. J., 40(1), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-086
  8. Frey, Christopher (1998), "Quantitative analysis of variability and uncertainty in energy and environmental systems", In: B.M. Ayyub, Ed., Uncertainty modelling and analysis in civil engineering, Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp 381-423.
  9. Griffiths, D.V., Fenton, G.A. and Manoharan, N. (2002), "Bearing capacity of rough rigid footings on cohesive soil: Probabilistic study", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 128(9), 743-755. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:9(743)
  10. Hammersley, J.M. and Handscomb, D.C. (1964), Monte Carlo methods, Wiley Press, New York.
  11. Juang, C.H., Wey, J.L. and Elton, D.J. (1991), "Model for capacity of single piles in sand using fuzzy sets", J. Geotech. Eng., 117(12), 1920-1931. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:12(1920)
  12. Lee, I.K., White, W. and Ingles, O.G. (1983), Geotechnical engineering, Pitman Publishing Inc., Boston.
  13. Lumb, P. (1970), "Safety factors and the probability distribution of soil strength", Can. Geotech. J., 7(3), 225- 242. https://doi.org/10.1139/t70-032
  14. Palisade (2000), @Risk: Risk analysis and simulation version 4.0, Palisade Corp., New York.
  15. Phoon, K.K. and Kulhawy, F.H. (1999), "Characterisation of geotechnical variability", Can. Geotech. J., 36(4), 612-624. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-038
  16. Popescu, R., Deodatis, G. and Nobahar, A. (2005), "Effect of random heterogeneity of soil properties on bearing capacity", Prob. Eng. Mech., 20(4), 324-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2005.06.003
  17. Przewlocki, J. (2005), "A stochastic approach to the problem of bearing capacity by the method of characteristics", Comput. Geotech., 32(3), 370-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2005.06.001
  18. Rubinstein, R.Y. (1981), Simulation and the Monte Carlo method, Wiley Press, New York.
  19. Terzaghi, K. (1943), Theoretical soil mechanics, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  20. Vessia, G., Cherubini, C., Pieczynska, J. and Pula, W. (2009), "Application of random finite element method to bearing capacity design of strip footing", J. GeoEng., 4(3), 103-112.
  21. Wolff, T.H. (1985), "Analysis and design of embankment dam slopes: a probabilistic approach", PhD Thesis, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana.
  22. Yuceman, M.S., Tang, M.S. and Ang, A.H. (1973), "A probabilistic study of safety and design of earth slopes", Urbana, University of Illinois.

Cited by

  1. Decrease trends of ultimate loads of eccentrically loaded model strip footings close to a slope vol.6, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2014.6.5.469
  2. Natural Variability of Shear Strength in a Granite Residual Soil from Porto vol.32, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9768-1
  3. Design of boundary combined footings of trapezoidal form using a new model vol.56, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.56.5.745
  4. Experimental and finite element analyses of footings of varying shapes on sand vol.12, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2017.12.2.223
  5. Variability of subgrade reaction modulus on flexible mat foundation vol.13, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2017.13.5.757
  6. A comparative study for design of boundary combined footings of trapezoidal and rectangular forms using new models vol.6, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2017.6.4.417
  7. Bearing capacity of shallow foundations on the bilayer rock vol.21, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.21.1.011
  8. Three-dimensional probabilistic stability analysis of an earth dam using an active learning metamodeling approach vol.81, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02512-y