Journal of the Korean Society of Costume (복식)

The Korean Society of Costume (한국복식학회)
권호 표지

Modernity in Costume

복식에 있어서의 근대성의 의미

  • Yi, Jae-Yoon (Research Institute for Human Life Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 이재윤 (성균관대학교 생활과학연구소)
  • Received : 2010.10.14
  • Accepted : 2010.12.20
  • Published : 2011.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Modernity is commonly defined as a reflection of the features of modern society based on the historical experience of the West. As such, modernity includes involvement with political, economic, and social changes, a changing world-view, and changing trends in equality, gender roles, a desire for "the new," consumption, distribution based on mass production, and rational reform in fashion and dress. First and foremost, however, modernity in costume has been driven by the functional requirements of industrial capitalism. But while modernity has popularly been regarded as some sort of universal standard, in fact the West and the other societies have vastly different, unique, and particular experiences with their own respective histories of modernization. For this reason, cultural changes in the modernization process should be-indeed, must be-analyzed in the context of a country's own unique historical and cultural circumstances, rather than through the prism or strict adaptation of generalized Western concepts of modernization. Moreover, a "periodization" of the modernization of fashion and dress can be established by examining the characteristics of modernity in costume.

Keywords

References

  1. 박지향 (2009). 일그러진 근대. 서울: 푸른 역사, p. 28.
  2. Hall, S. (1995). Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, p. 8.
  3. Hall, S. (1995). Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, p. 3.
  4. Black, C. E. & Wilson, W. (1966). The Dynamics of Modernization; a Study in Comparative History (1st ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
  5. Hall, S. (1995). Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, p. 10.
  6. Barnard, M. (1996). Fashion as Communication. London; New York: Routledge.
  7. Breward, C. & Evans, C. (1995). Fashion and Modernity. Oxford; New York: Berg.
  8. Breward, C. (1995). The Culture of Fashion: A New History of Fashionable Dress. Studies in Design and Material Culture. New York: Manchester University Press; Distributed exclusively in the USA and Canada by St. Martin's Press.
  9. Wilson, E. (2003). Adorned in Dreams: Fashion and Modernity, (Rev.ed.) New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
  10. Wilson, E. (2003). Adorned in Dreams: Fashion and Modernity, (Rev.ed.) New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, p. 60.
  11. 김윤희 (1996). 복식의 근대성에 관한 연구. 복식, 30, pp. 127-138.
  12. Wilson, E. (2003). Adorned in Dreams: Fashion and Modernity, (Rev.ed.) New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, p. 63.
  13. Barnard, M. (1996). Fashion as Communication. London; New York: Routledge, p. 160.
  14. Faurschou, G. (1988). Fashion and the Cultural Logic of Postmodernity, in Body Invaders: Sexuality and the Postmodern Condition, ed. A. and Kroker Kroker, M. Basingstoke: Macmillan, p. 80.
  15. Breward, C. (1995). The Culture of Fashion: A New History of Fashionable Dress. Studies in Design and Material Culture. New York: Manchester University Press; Distributed exclusively in the USA and Canada by St. Martin's Press, pp. 176-178.
  16. Breward, C. (1995). The Culture of Fashion: A New History of Fashionable Dress. Studies in Design and Material Culture. New York: Manchester University Press; Distributed exclusively in the USA and Canada by St. Martin's Press, p. 147.
  17. Breward, C. (1995). The Culture of Fashion: A New History of Fashionable Dress. Studies in Design and Material Culture. New York: Manchester University Press; Distributed exclusively in the USA and Canada by St. Martin's Press, p. 162.
  18. Breward, C. (1995). The Culture of Fashion: A New History of Fashionable Dress. Studies in Design and Material Culture. New York: Manchester University Press; Distributed exclusively in the USA and Canada by St. Martin's Press, p. 16.
  19. Fairservis, W. A. (1971). Costumes of the East. Riverside, Conn.,: Chatham Press; distributed by Viking Press, NewYork, pp. 16-17.
  20. Beetham, M. & Boardman, K. (2001). Victorian Women's Magazines: An Anthology. New York: Manchester University Press; Distributed exclusively in the U.S.A. by Palgrave.
  21. Berman, M. (1988). The Experience of Modernity, in Design after Modernism: Beyond the Object, ed. John Thackara. New York: Thames and Hudson, p. 17.
  22. Barnard, M. (1996). Fashion as Communication. London; New York: Routledge, p. 147.
  23. Faurschou, G. (1988). Fashion and the Cultural Logic of Postmodernity, in Body Invaders: Sexuality and the Postmodern Condition, ed. A. and Kroker Kroker, M. Basingstoke: Macmillan, p.79.
  24. Fairservis, W. A. (1971). Costumes of the East. Riverside, Conn.,: Chatham Press; distributed by Viking Press, NewYork, p. 14.
  25. Mason, E. S. & Harvard University, Council on East Asian Studies (1980). The Economic and Social Modernization of the Republic of Korea, Studies in the Modernization of the Republic of Korea, 1945-1975. Cambridge, Mass.: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University: distributed by Harvard University Press, pp. 95-96.
  26. 이민수, 윤남한, 이원섭 편 (1981). 한국의 근대사상. 서울: 삼성, pp. 13-16.
  27. Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 174. (qtd. in Hall. p. 16)
  28. Boyne, R. & Rattansi, A. (1990). Postmodernism and Society(Communications and Culture). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan, pp. 127-130.
  29. 문화관광부, 우리옷2000년편찬위원회 (2001). 우리옷 이천년. 서울: 미술문화, p. 120.
  30. Everett M. Rogers (1995). Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed. New York: Free Press, p. 269.
  31. 문화관광부, 우리옷2000년편찬위원회 (2001). 우리옷 이천년. 서울: 미술문화, p. 132.
  32. "身體髮膚受之父母, 不敢毁傷孝之始也" 소학 효행편.