DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of DRG Payment on the Length of Stay and the Number of Outpatient Visits After Discharge for Caesarean Section During 2004-2007

DRG 지불제도가 재원일수와 퇴원 후 외래방문일수에 미치는 영향: 2004-2007년도 제왕절개술을 중심으로

  • Shon, Chang-Woo (Seoul National University Graduate School of Public Health) ;
  • Chung, Seol-Hee (Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service) ;
  • Yi, Seon-Ju (Seoul National University Graduate School of Public Health) ;
  • Kwon, Soon-Man (Seoul National University Graduate School of Public Health)
  • Received : 2010.06.10
  • Accepted : 2010.11.08
  • Published : 2011.01.31

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG)-based payment on the length of stay and the number of outpatient visits after discharge in for patients who had undergone caesarean section. Methods: This study used the health insurance data of the patients in health care facilities that were paid by the Fee-For-Service (FFS) in 2001-2004, but they participated in the DRG payment system in 2005-2007. In order to examine the net effects of DRG payment, the Difference-In-Differences (DID) method was adopted to observe the difference in health care utilization before and after the participation in the DRG payment system. The dependent variables of the regression model were the length of stay and number of outpatient visits after discharge, and the explanatory variables included the characteristics of the patients and the health care facilities. Results: The length of stay in DRG-paid health care facilities was greater than that in the FFS-paid ones. Yet, DRG payment has no statistically significant effect on the number of outpatient visits after discharge. Conclusions: The results of this study that DRG payment was not effective in reducing the length of stay can be related to the nature of voluntary participation in the DRG system. Only those health care facilities that are already efficient in terms of the length of stay or that can benefit from the DRG payment may decide to participate in the program.

Keywords

References

  1. Chung SH, Lee SK. Kang KR. Influence of DRG payment system upon providers' practice pattern. Seoul: Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service; 2008. (Korean)
  2. Kwon SM. Fiscal crisis of the national health insurance in Korea: causes and policy options. Korean Policy Stud Rev 2001; 10(3): 177-198. (Korean)
  3. Shin YS. Introduction of DRG payment system and quality assurance in health care. J Korean Soc Qual Assur Health Care 1995; 2(1): 2-19. (Korean)
  4. Kahn KL, Rogers WH, Rubenstein LV, Sherwood MJ, Reinisch EJ, Keeler EB, et al. Measuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system. JAMA 1990; 264(15): 1969-1973. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03450150069033
  5. Coulam RF, Gaumer GL. Medicare's prospective payment system : a critical appraisal. Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl 1991; 45-77.
  6. Gay EG, Kronenfeld JJ. Regulation, retrenchment-the DRG experience: problems from changing reimbursement practice. Soc Sci Med 1990; 31(10): 1103-1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(90)90232-H
  7. Berki SE, Ashcraft ML, Newbrander WC. Length-of-stay variations within ICDA-8 diagnosis-related groups. Med Care 1984; 22(2): 126-142. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198402000-00004
  8. Fitzgerald JF, Fagan LF, Tierney WM, Dittus RS. Changing patterns of hip fracture care before and after implementation of the prospective payment system. JAMA 1987; 258(2): 218-221. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1987.03400020060031
  9. Chulis GS. Assessing medicare's prospective payment system for hospitals. Med Care Res Rev 1991; 48(2): 167-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/002570879104800203
  10. Chan L, Koepsell TD, Deyo RA, Esselman PC, Haselkorn JK, Lowery JK, et al. The effect of Medicare's payment system for rehabilitation hospitals on length of stay, charges, and total payments. N Engl J Med 1997; 337(14): 978-985. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199710023371406
  11. Seo CJ. Review and suggestions for second pilot program of DRG payment. J Korean Soc Health Syst Pharm 1999; 16(3): 329-349. (Korean)
  12. Ministry of Health and Welfare. A survey on opinions on the DRG reimbursement system. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2000. (Korean)
  13. Yim J. Changes in quality of care for caesarean section after implementation of DRG-based system [dissertation]. Seoul: Seoul National University; 2001. (Korean)
  14. Ko Y. The effect of DRG-PPS (DRG-prospective payment system) on provider's service uses according to the participation periods [dissertation]. Seoul: Seoul National University. 2003. (Korean)
  15. Lee KS. Assessing the variation of length of stay within the diagnosis-related groups [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei University. 2005. (Korean)
  16. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. Appraisal report for caesarean section. Seoul: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service; 2009. (Korean)
  17. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. A study on the development of 7 categorized DRG payment system. Seoul: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service; 2009. (Korean)
  18. Lee SI. Strategies for assuring quality of care under the DRG-based prospective payment system. J Korean Med Assoc 2000; 43(6): 517-521. (Korean) https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2000.43.6.517
  19. DesHarnais S, Kobrinski E, Chesney J, Long M, Ament R, Fleming S. The early effects of the prospective payment system on inpatient utilization and the quality of care. Inquiry 1987; 24(1): 7-16.

Cited by

  1. DRGs(Diagnosis Related Groups)별 환자집중도 수준에 따른 입원진료비와 재원일수의 차이 분석 vol.8, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12811/kshsm.2014.8.4.013
  2. The effect of competition on the relationship between the introduction of the DRG system and quality of care in Korea vol.26, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv162
  3. 포괄수가제도 당연적용 효과평가 vol.26, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4332/kjhpa.2016.26.2.135
  4. Effects of a mandatory DRG payment system in South Korea: Analysis of multi-year nationwide hospital claims data vol.19, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4650-8