DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Structure and Characteristics of Bacterial Community on Biofilm of Food Wastewater Treatment System in Winter

식품폐수 처리 공정용 생물막의 겨울철 세균군집 구조와 특성

  • Lee, Dong-Geun (Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, College of Medical Life Science, Silla University) ;
  • Yoo, Ki-Hwan (Biotechnology Research Division, National Fisheries Research & Development Institute) ;
  • Park, Seong-Joo (Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Daejeon University)
  • 이동근 (신라대학교 의생명과학대학 제약공학과) ;
  • 유기환 (국립수산과학원 생명공학연구단) ;
  • 박성주 (대전대학교 임상병리학과)
  • Received : 2011.01.25
  • Accepted : 2011.03.22
  • Published : 2011.04.30

Abstract

Biofilm and aeration tank of pilot and full RABC (rotating activated Bacillus contactor) plant were analyzed to characterize and determine bacterial community structure in food wastewater treatment system at winter. Concentration of heterotrophic bacteria and Bacillus group was $10^7$ and $10^5$ CFU/ml, respectively, at biofilm of pilot-plant while others represented $10^6$ and $10^4$ CFU/ml, respectively. Five and eight phyla were detected at biofilm of pilot- and full-plant, respectively, by 16S rDNA sequencing. Biofilm of pilot-plant was dominated by ${\beta}$-Proteobacteria (38.8%), ${\gamma}$-Proteobacteria (22.4%), and Bacteroidetes (12.2%), and the most dominant genus was Zoogloeae genus (22.4%). Candidate division TM7 (12.5%) was only detected at biofilm of full-plant and it was dominated by Bacteroidetes (33.3%), ${\gamma}$-Proteobacteria (29.2%), and ${\beta}$-Proteobacteria (20.8%). Clostridium genus specific primer set enabled to detect the sequences of Clostridium genus. These suggested that anaerobic and aerobic bacteria were coexisted even from the initial period of biofilm formation and ${\beta}$-Proteobacteria, ${\gamma}$-Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes were major phyla in biofilm of food wastewater treatment system at winter.

Keywords

References

  1. Shin MC, Lee YS. The effects of changing of hydraulic retention time and charging media on the removal of nitrogen and phosphorus in the up-flow anaerobic/anoxic reactor and water-mill for sewage treatment. J Environ Heallth Sci. 2009; 35(1): 64-70. https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2009.35.1.064
  2. Choi JT, Nam SY. Sewage treatment using a modified DNR process. J Environ Heallth Sci. 2008; 34(6): 446-451. https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2008.34.6.446
  3. Ministry of Enviornment Republic of Korea. 2008 White paper on environment. 2009.
  4. Kim DS, Park YS. Nutrient removal characterization by the addition ratio of BNR sludge in SBR. J Environ Heallth Sci. 2008; 34(1): 76-85.
  5. Ahn TS, Hong SH, Kim OS, Yoo JJ, Jeon SO, Choi SI. The changes of Bacillus spp. in municipal wastewater treatment plant with B3 process. Korean J Microbiol. 2001; 37(3): 209-213.
  6. Park TJ, Lee CM, Song KS, Cho IH, Kim YK, Chung MH. A study on the removal of nitrogen and phosphorus depending on existence of cilia media in sewage in anaerobic-anoxic-oxic process. J Environ Heallth Sci. 2000; 26(3): 69-75.
  7. Imai A, Onuma K, Inamori Y, Sudo R. Biodegradation and adsorption in refractory leachate treatment by the biological activated carbon fluidized bed process. Wat Res. 1995; 29(2): 687-694. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(94)00147-Y
  8. Kutics K, Suzuki M. Attachment and growth of biomass on surface-modified activated carbon fibers. Wat Sci Tech. 1992; 26(10): 665-671. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00028a604
  9. Kim EH, Jo YJ, Park SJ, Sin GS, Im SB, Jeong JG. Advanced wastewater treatment process using rotating activated Bacillus contactor (RABC). J KSWQ. 2004; 20(2): 190-195.
  10. Park SJ, Yoon JC, Shin KS, Kim EH, Yim S, Cho YJ, Sung GM, Lee DG, Kim SB, Lee DU, Woo SH, Koopman B. Dominance of endospore-forming bacteria on a rotating activated bacillus contactor biofilm for advanced wastewater treatment. The J Microbiol. 2007; 45(2): 113-121.
  11. Forster S, Lappin-Scott HM, Snape JR, Porter J. Rains, drains and active strains: towards online assessment of wastewater bacterial communities. J Microbiol Meth. 2003; 55(3): 859-864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2003.08.004
  12. Ministry of Environment, Mechanistic Modeling for Bacillus System, 2008.
  13. Jeong S, Nam JH, Bae W, Lee DH. Bacterial community structure of food wastewater treatment system combined with rotating biological contactor and tapered aeration reactor. Korean J Microbiol. 2010; 46(2): 169-176.
  14. Lee DG, Lee JH, Kim SJ. Diversity and dynamics of bacterial species in a biofilm at the end of the Seoul water distribution system. World J Microbiol Biotech. 2005; 21(2): 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-004-2890-0
  15. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York; 1989.
  16. Lu F, Lukasik J, Farrah SR. Immunological methods for the study of Zoogloea strains in natural environments. Wat Res. 2001; 35(17): 4011-4018. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00141-5
  17. Rossell-Mora RA, Wagner M, Amann R, Schleifer KH. The abundance of Zoogloea ramigera in sewage treatment plants. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995; 61(2): 702-707.
  18. Jin L, Wang XJ, Gu ZL, Zhou DZ, Xie SQ. Biodegradation of lubricating oil in wastewater with Zoogloea sp. Pedosphere. 2006; 16(4): 540-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(06)60086-6
  19. Lee H, Choi E, Yun Z, Park YK. Microbial structure and community of RBC biofilm removing nitrate and phosphorus from domestic wastewater. J Microbiol Biotech. 2008; 18(8): 1459-1469.
  20. Silva CC, Jesus EC, Torres AP, Sousa MP, Santiago VM, Oliveira, VM. Investigation of bacterial diversity in membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge processes from petroleum refineries using phylogenetic and statistical approaches. J Microbiol Biotech. 2010; 20(3): 447-459.
  21. Ren N, Xing D, Rittmann BE, Zhao L, Xie T, Zhao X. Microbial community structure of ethanol type fermentation in bio-hydrogen production. Environ Microbiol. 2007; 9(5): 1112-1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01234.x
  22. Hugenholtz P, Tryson GW, Webb RI, Wagner AM, Blackall L.L. Investigation of candidate division TM7, a recently recognized major lineage of the domain Bacteria with no known pure-culture representatives. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001; 67(1): 411-419. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.1.411-419.2001
  23. Thomsen TR, Kjellerup BV, Nielsen JL. In situ studies of the phylogeny and physiology of filamentous bacteria with attached growth. Environ Microbiol. 2002; 4(7): 383-391. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00316.x
  24. Wu XY, Walker MJ, Hornitzky M, Chin J. Development of a group-specific PCR combined with ARDRA for the identification of Bacillus species of environmental significance. J Microbiol Meth. 2006; 64(1): 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2005.04.021
  25. Rekha R, Rizvi MA, Jaishree P. Designing and validation of genus-specific primers for human gut flora study. Elect J Biotechnol. 2006; 9(5): 505-511.
  26. Sung GM. Structure and characteristics of bacterial communities of the RABC process for food wastewater treatment. Ph.D. thesis. Daejeon University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea; 2010.
  27. Lim BR, Bae CA, Lim HJ, Cho CH. Treatment performance and microbial community structure in BAC-process treating contaminated groundwater by water-soluble cutting oil. J Environ Heallth Sci. 2006; 32(1): 71-76.
  28. Seo KJ, Kim JM, Kim MJ, Kim SK, Lee JE, Kim IY, Zoh KD, Ko GP. Assessing water quality of Siheung stream in Shihwa industrial complex using both principal component analysis and multi-dimensional scaling analysis of korean water quality index and microbial community data. J Environ Heallth Sci. 2009; 35(6): 454-462. https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2009.35.6.517
  29. Kim MK, Hong JH, Kim YK, Ahn TS, Shin EB. Evaluation of field application for the developed retrofitting process and analysis of bacterial community structure in pilot-plant. J Kor Soc Environ Engin. 2006; 28(3): 240-248.
  30. Ranjard L, Poly F, Nazaret S. Monitoring complex bacterial communities using culture-independent molecular techniques: application to soil environment. Res Microbiol. 2000; 151(3): 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-2508(00)00136-4