DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Verification and validation of ShipMo3D ship motion predictions in the time and frequency domains

  • Published : 2011.03.31

Abstract

This paper compares frequency domain and time domain predictions from the ShipMo3D ship motion library with observed motions from model tests and sea trials. ShipMo3D evaluates hull radiation and diffraction forces using the frequency domain Green function for zero forward speed, which is a suitable approach for ships travelling at moderate speed (e.g., Froude numbers up to 0.4). Numerical predictions give generally good agreement with experiments. Frequency domain and linear time domain predictions are almost identical. Evaluation of nonlinear buoyancy and incident wave forces using the instantaneous wetted hull surface gives no improvement in numerical predictions. Consistent prediction of roll motions remains a challenge for seakeeping codes due to the associated viscous effects.

Keywords

References

  1. De Kat, J.O. Brouwer, R. McTaggart, K. and Thomas, L., 1994. Intact Ship Survivability in Extreme Waves: Criteria from a Research and Navy Perspective. 5th International Conference on Stability of Ships and Ocean Vehicles, Melbourne, Florida, USA.
  2. Himeno, Y., 1981. Prediction of Ship Roll Damping - State of the Art. Report 239, Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, University of Michigan, USA.
  3. Inoue, S. Hirano., M. and Kijima, K., 1981. Hydrodynamic Derivatives on Ship Manoeuvring. International Shipbuilding Progress, 28(321), pp.112-125.
  4. Kuhl, F. Weatherly, R. and Dahmann, J., 1999. Creating Computer Simulation Systems - An Introduction to the High Level Architecture. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. USA.
  5. Lloyd, A.R.J.M. and Crossland, P., 1990. Motions of a Steered Model Warship in Oblique Waves. Transactions, Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 132, pp.79-98.
  6. McTaggart, K., 2006. Simulation of Ship Motions with Python. SimTecT 2006, Melbourne, Australia.
  7. McTaggart, K. Datta, I. Stirling, A. Gibson, S. and Glen, I., 1997. Motions and Loads of a Hydroelastic Frigate Model in Severe Seas. Transactions, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 105, pp.427-453
  8. McTaggart, K. and de Kat, J.O., 2000. Capsize Risk of Intact Frigates in Irregular Seas. Transactions, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 108, pp. 147-177.
  9. McTaggart, K. and Langlois, R., 2009. Physics-based modelling of ship replenishment at sea using distributed simulation. SNAME Annual Meeting and Expo, Providence. RI, USA.
  10. McTaggart, K. and Stredulinsky, D., 2004. Validation of Ship Motion Predictions with Sea Trials Data for a Naval Destroyer in Multidirectional Seas. 25th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, St. John's, Canada.
  11. Papanikolaou, A.D. and Schellin, T.E., 1992. A Three-Dimensional Panel Method for Motions and Loads of Ships with Forward Speed. Schiffstechnik, Vol. 39, pp. 147-156.
  12. Salvesen, N. Tuck, E.O. and Faltinsen, O., 1970. Ship Motions and Sea Loads. Transactions, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 78, pp.250-287.
  13. Schellin, T.E., Chen, X.-B., Beiersdorf C., and Maron, A., 2002. Comparative Frequency Domain Seakeeping Analysis of a Fast Monohull in Regular Head Waves. 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Oslo, Norway.
  14. Schmitke, R.T., 1978. Ship Sway, Roll, and Yaw Motions in Oblique Seas. Transactions, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 86, pp.26-46.
  15. Stredulinsky, D.C. Pegg, N.G. and Gilroy, L.E., 2000. Motion and Wave Load Predictions and Measurements on HMCS NIPIGON. Transactions, Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 142, pp. 248-258.
  16. Wehausen, J.V., 1971. The Motion of Floating Bodies. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 3, pp. 237-268. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.03.010171.001321

Cited by

  1. A Concept for Docking a UUV With a Slowly Moving Submarine Under Waves vol.41, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2015.2424731