Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Utilization of Business Intelligence and Dashboard in Academic Libraries

대학도서관에서 업무지능과 대시보드의 활용방안에 관한 연구

  • 구중억 (한국기초과학지원연구원 예산팀)
  • Received : 2011.02.28
  • Accepted : 2011.03.12
  • Published : 2011.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Business Intelligence(BI) is being used by the individuals who make decisions for management. Dashboard supports business intelligence by visualizing data, information, and knowledge so that they can be grasped at a glance. In this study, applications of dashboard were analyzed in the ARL libraries websites. Furthermore, the study suggested methods to establish and use the information system of the business intelligence and dashboard on the academic library websites in Korea. The findings of this study are expected to serve as the basic data to utilize the business intelligence and dashboard as a tool with which Korean academic libraries can demonstrate their value to the stakeholders in the academic community.

업무지능(Business Intelligence)은 이해관계자들이 경영 의사결정을 내리는데 활용되고 있다. 대시 보드(Dashboard)는 데이터, 정보 또는 지식을 한 눈에 이해할 수 있도록 가시화해 줌으로써 업무지능을 지원해 주고 있다. 본 연구에서는 미국 ARL 소속 대학도서관의 웹사이트에서 도서관의 성과와 가치에 관한 정보공개 현황을 살펴보았다. 그리고 국외 대학도서관의 웹사이트에서 업무지능과 대시보드의 적용 사례를 분석하였다. 이를 통해 국내 대학도서관의 웹사이트에서 업무지능과 대시보드 정보시스템의 구축 및 활용을 제안하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 국내 대학도서관이 웹사이트를 통해 이해관계자들에게 도서관의 성과와 가치를 효율적으로 전달하고 의사소통의 도구로서 업무지능과 대시보드를 활용하기 위한 기초자료가 될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 구중억. 2009. 대학도서관의 정보공개 및 공시 실태분석을 통한 개선방안에 관한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 40(4): 327-351.
  2. 조희윤. 2006. 대학도서관의 BSC 적용에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(1): 241-262.
  3. Bhatnagar, A. 2009. “Web Analytics for Business Intelligence: Beyond Hits and Sessions.” Online, 33(6): 32-35.
  4. Hernon P. and Altman E. 1998. Assessing Service Quality: Satisfying the Expectations of Library Customers, ALA: Chicago.
  5. Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. 1992. “The Balanced Scorecard - Measures that Drive Performance.” Harvard Business Review, 70(1): 71-79.
  6. Matthews, J. R. 2007. The Evaluation and Measurement of Library Services, Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.
  7. McLean, N. and C. Wilde. 1991. “Evaluating Library Performance: The Search for Relevance.” Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 22(3): 198-210.
  8. Rob, P. and C. Coronel. 2009. Database Systems: Design, Implementation, and Management, 8th ed. Boston: Thomson/Course Technology.
  9. Watson, H. J. 2009. “Tutorial: Business Intelligence -- Past, Present, and Future.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 25: 487-510.
  10. Wright, S. and L. S. White. 2007. SPEC Kit 303: Library Assessment, Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
  11. Yeoh, W. and A. Koronios. 2010. “Critical Success Factors for Business Intelligence Systems.” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(3): 23-32.
  12. Zucca, J. 2008. “Building frameworks of organizational intelligence: strategies and solutions stemming from the Penn Libraries Data Farm Project.” Proceedings of the 2008 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment, 37-42.
  13. Ball State University Libraries. .
  14. Brigham Young University - Harold B. Lee Library. .
  15. Brown University Library. .
  16. Buffalo State College - E. H. Butler Library. .
  17. Drake University - Cowles Library. .
  18. IUPUI University Library. .
  19. Monash University Library. .
  20. Newcastle University Library. .
  21. North Carolina State University Libraries. .
  22. Radboud University Nijmegen Library. .
  23. Regent University Library. .
  24. University of Huddersfield Library..
  25. University of Leicester Library. .
  26. University of Puget Sound - Collins Memorial Library. .
  27. University of Richmond - Boatwright Memorial Library. .
  28. University of Tennessee Libraries. .
  29. University of Virginia Library. .
  30. Washington State University Libraries. .

Cited by

  1. Performance Assesment based Dashboards for Maintenance Management System vol.16, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12812/ksms.2014.16.4.417