정보관리학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for information Management)

  • 제28권1호
  • /
  • Pages.145-170
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1013-0799(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-2073(eISSN)
한국정보관리학회 (Korean Society for Information Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

연구문헌의 지식구조를 반영하는 의미기반의 지식조직체계에 관한 연구

A Study on the Knowledge Organizing System of Research Papers Based on Semantic Relation of the Knowledge Structure

  • 고영만 (성균관대학교 문과대학 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 송인석 (한국과학기술정보연구원)
  • 투고 : 2011.02.18
  • 심사 : 2011.03.10
  • 발행 : 2011.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 연구문헌의 지식구조를 반영하는 의미기반 지식조직체계의 실험적 모형을 제시하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 한국연구재단의 기초학문자료센터에 대한 사례분석을 하였다. 기초학문자료센터 연구성과물 DB와 학술용어 DR의 개념클래스 및 인스턴스를 대상으로 연구문헌의 지식구조를 파악하였으며, 기초학문자료센터 시스템의 학술적 이해형성 기능을 분석하였다. 또한 연구문헌의 지식구조와 색인어의 관계를 분석하였다. 이러한 분석을 통해 지식구조와 색인어의 관계구조, 26개의 연구문헌 지식구조 공리 및 11개의 의미관계 추론규칙으로 구성되는 온톨로지 모형, 즉 연구문헌의 지식구조와 그 의미관계에 의한 실험적 지식조직체계 모형을 제시하였다.

The purpose of this paper is to suggest a pilot model of knowledge organizing system which reflects the knowledge structure of research papers, using a case analysis on the "Korean Research Memory" of the National Research Foundation of Korea. In this paper, knowledge structure of the research papers in humanities and social science is described and the function of the "Korean Research Memory" for scholarly sense-making is analysed. In order to suggest the pilot model of the knowledge organizing system, the study also analysed the relation between indexed keyword and knowledge structure of research papers in the Korean Research Memory. As a result, this paper suggests 24 axioms and 11 inference rules for an ontology based on semantic relation of the knowledge structure.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제번호 : 의미기반 분석정보서비스를 위한 기초학문자료센터 연구성과물 DB 지식구조 분석 연구

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 한국연구재단

참고문헌

  1. 고영만. 2010. 의미기반 분석정보서비스를 위한 기초학문자료센터 연구성과물 DB 지식구조 분석연구. [대전]: 한국연구재단. 정책연구-2009-028-미래전략.
  2. 송인석. 2008. 연구학술정보 효율적 검색을 위한 온톨로지 기반의 주제 색인어 구조화 방안 연구. 정보관리연구, 39(4): 121-154.
  3. Buckingham, S.S. 2006. “Sensemaking on the pragmatic Web: A Hypermedia Discourse Perspective.” Proc. PragWeb '06: 1st International Conference on the Pragmatic Web, Sttutgart, September, 2006, 21-23.
  4. Buckingham, S. S., E. Motta, and J. Dominique. 2000. “Scholonto: Ontology-Based Digital Library Server for Research Document and Discourse.” International Journal on Digital Libraries, 3: 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007990000034
  5. Waard, A. and G. Tel. 2006. “The ABCDE Format: Enabling Semantic Conference Proceedings.” Proceedings of the First Workshop on Semantic Wikis: From Wiki to Semantic, European Semantic Web Conference. 2006. Budva, Montenegro. May, 15, 97-108.
  6. De Waarde, A. 2007. “A Pragmatic Structure for Research Articles.” 2nd International Conference on the Pragmatic Web, October, 2007. Tilburg, Netherlands, 22-23.
  7. Harmsze, F.A.P. 2000. A modular structure for scientific articles in an electronic environment, Ph.D. Dissertation, Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute, University of Amsterdam.
  8. Horn, R. 2000. “Teaching Philosophy with Argumentation Maps." Newsletter of the American Philosophical Association, November, 2000.
  9. Kando, N. 1997. “Text-level structure of research articles and its implication for textbased information processing systems." Proceedings of the 19th British Computer Society Annual Colloquium on Information Retrieval Research. Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, April, 1997, 68-81.
  10. Kando, N. 1999. “Text structure analysis as a tool to make retrieved documents usable." Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Information Retrieval with Asian Languages. Taipei, Taiwan, November 11-12, 1999, 126-135.
  11. Ko, Y. M. 2009. “Strategies for Collaboration and Resource Sharing in Building Intelligent Digital Libraries - Not everything is technical; Lessons from ‘Korean Research Memory(KRM)' Project." Proceedings of the International Conference commemorating the Opening of the National Digital Library - Libraries leading the Global Knowledge and Information Society, Seoul; The National Library of Korea, May 26, 2009. 234-256
  12. Mann, W. and Thompson, S. 1988. “Rhetorical structure theory: Toward functional theory of text organization.” Text, 8(3): 243-281. .
  13. Pike, W. and M. Gahegan. 2007. “Beyond ontologies: Toward situated representations of scientific knowledge." Human-Computer Studies, 65: 659-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.02.004
  14. Shotton, D. 2009. CiTO, the Citation Typing Ontology, and its use for annotation of reference list and visualization of citation networks. .
  15. Van Oostendorp, H. 2002. Cognition in Digital World. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

피인용 문헌

  1. Usability Analysis of Structured Abstracts in Journal Articles for Document Clustering vol.29, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.1.331
  2. A Study on a Conceptual Taxonomy of Author Keywords of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Art and Sport in the Korea Citation Index (KCI) by Analysis of its Meaning and Lexical Morpheme vol.48, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.4.297