한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경 (Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment)

  • 제16권6호
  • /
  • Pages.122-132
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1598-6438(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-8831(eISSN)
한국지하수토양환경학회 (Korean Society of Soil and Groundwater Environment)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

pH에 따른 부식유기산의 메틸수은 결합 리간드 변화: X-선 흡수분석

pH Dependence of CH3Hg+-binding Sites in Humic Acid: An X-ray Absorption Study

  • 윤소정 (한국지질자원연구원 광물자원연구실) ;
  • Yoon, Soh-Joung (Mineral Resources Research Department, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources) ;
  • Bleam, William F. (Department of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin)
  • 투고 : 2011.12.16
  • 심사 : 2011.12.22
  • 발행 : 2011.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Mercury accumulates in biota mainly as methylmercury. In nature, methylmercury shows high affinity to organic matter and $CH_3Hg^+$-organic matter complexation affects the mobility and bioavailabiity of methylmercury. In this study, we examined the methylmercury binding sites in an aquatic humic acid as affected by the pH condition using Hg $L_{III}$-edge extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS). We evaluated methylmercury binding humic ligands using methylmercury-thiol, methylmerury-carboxyl, and methylmercury-amine complexation models. When $CH_3Hg^+$-to-humic reduced sulfur ratio is 0.3, we found that most of $CH_3Hg^+$ binds to thiol ligands at pH 5 and 7. At pH 7, however, some carboxyl or amine ligand contribution is observed, unlike at pH 5 where $CH_3Hg^+$ almost exclusively binds to thiol ligands. The carboxyl or amine ligand contribution may indicate that some types of thiol ligands in the natural organic matter have relatively low complexation constants or acid dissociation constants compared to those of some carboxyl or amine ligands. Analysis results indicate that ~0.2 fraction of methylmercury binds to amine or carboxyl ligands and ~0.8 to thiol ligands at pH 7.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alex, S., Savoie, R., Corbeil, M.-C., and Beauchamp, A.L., 1986, Complexation of glycylglycine by methylmercury cation: a vibrational spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction study, Can. J. Chem., 64, 148-157. https://doi.org/10.1139/v86-026
  2. Al-Reasi, H.A., Wood, C.M., and Smith, D.S., 2011, Physicochemical and spectroscopic properties of natural organic matter (NOM) from various sources and implications for ameliorative effects on metal toxicity to aquatic biota, Aquat. Toxicol., 103, 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2011.02.015
  3. Amirbahman, A., Reid, A.L. Haines, T.A., Kahl, J.S., and Arnold, C., 2002, Association of methylmercury with dissolved humic acids, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 690-695. https://doi.org/10.1021/es011044q
  4. Barkay, T., Gillman, M., and Turner, R.R., 1997, Effects of dissolved organic carbon and salinity on bioavailability of mercury, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 63, 4267-4271.
  5. Beauchamp, A.L. and Goutier, D., 1971, Structure cristalline et moleculaire du thiocyanate mercurique, Can. J. Chem., 50, 977- 981.
  6. Bouldin, C., Furenlid, L., and Elam, T., 1995, MacXAFS: An EXAFS analysis package for the Macintosh, Physica B., 208 and 209, 190-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4526(94)01012-P
  7. Brese, N.E. and O'Keeffe, M., 1991, Bond-valence parameters for solids, Acta Cryst., B47, 192-197.
  8. Brown, I.D., 1981, The bond-valence method: an empirical approach to chemical structure and bonding. In M. O'Keeffe and A. Navrotsky (ed.), Structure and Bonding in Crystals, vol. 2., Academic Press, New York, pp. 1-30.
  9. Corbeil, M.-C. and Beauchamp, A.L., 1988, Methylmercury(II) complexes with tryptophan and its N-acetyl derivative, Can. J. Chem., 66, 2458-2464. https://doi.org/10.1139/v88-387
  10. Fairhurst, M.T. and Rabenstein, D.L., 1975, Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of the solution chemistry of metal complexes. XII. Binding of methylmercury by methionine, Inorg. Chem., 14, 1413-1415. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic50148a043
  11. Gilmour, C.C. and Henry, E.A., 1991, Mercury methylation in aquatic systems affected by acid deposition, Environ. Pollut., 71, 131-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(91)90031-Q
  12. Hesterberg, D., Chou, J.W., Hutchison, K.J., and Sayers, D.E., 2001, Bonding of Hg(II) to reduced organic sulfur in humic acid as affected by S/Hg ratio, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 2741-2745. https://doi.org/10.1021/es001960o
  13. Hintelmann, H., Welbourn, P.M., and Evans, R.D., 1995, Binding of methylmercury compounds by humic and fulvic acids, Water Air Soil Pollut., 80, 1031-1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189760
  14. Hintelmann, H., Welbourn, P.M., and Evans, R.D., 1997, Measurement of complexation of methylmercury(II) compounds by freshwater humic substances using equilibrium dialysis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1021/es960318k
  15. Holloway, C.E. and Melník, M., 1995, Mercury organometallic compounds. Classification and analysis of crystallographic and structural data, J. Organometal. Chem., 495, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-328X(95)05395-6
  16. Kelly, C.A., Rudd, J. W.M., and Holoka, M.H., 2003, Effect of pH on mercury uptake by an aquatic bacterium: implications for Hg cycling, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 2941-2946. https://doi.org/10.1021/es026366o
  17. Khwaja, A.R., Bloom, P.R., and Brezonik, P.L., 2010, Binding strength of methylmercury to aquatic NOM, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 6151-6156. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101088k
  18. Libich, S. and Rabenstein, D.L., 1973, Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of the solution chemistry of metal complexes. Determination of formation constants of methylmercury complexes of selected carboxylic acids, Anal. Chem., 45, 118-124. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60323a027
  19. Lytle, F.W., Greegor, R.B., Sandstrom, D.R., Marques, E.C., Wong, J., Spiro, C.L., Huffman, G.P., and Huggins, F.E., 1984, Measurement of soft X-ray absorption spectra with a fluorescent ion chamber detector, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A., 226, 542-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(84)90077-9
  20. Matilainen, T. and Verta, M., 1995, Mercury methylation and demethylation in aerobic surface waters, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 52, 1597-1608. https://doi.org/10.1139/f95-753
  21. Miskimmin, B.M., Rudd, J.W.M., and Kelly, C.A., 1992, Influence of dissolved organic carbon, pH, and microbial respiration rates on mercury methylation and demethylation in lake water, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 49, 17-22.
  22. Nagy, K.L., Manceau, A., Gasper, J.D., Ryan, J.N., and Aiken, G.R., 2011, Metallothionein-like multinuclear clusters of mercury( II) and sulfur in peat, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 7298- 7306. https://doi.org/10.1021/es201025v
  23. Pearson, R.G., 1967, Hard and soft acids and bases. Chem. Brit., 3, 103-107.
  24. Porvari, P. and Verta, M, 1995, Methylmercury production in flooded soils: A laboratory study, Water Air Soil Pollut., 80, 765-773. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189728
  25. Qian, J., Skyllberg, U., Tu, Q., Bleam, W.F., and Frech, W., 2000, Efficiency of solvent extraction methods for the determination of methyl mercury in forest soils, Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 367, 467-473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002160000364
  26. Qian, J., Skyllberg, U., Frech, W., Bleam, W.F., Bloom, P.R., and Petit, P.E., 2002, Bonding of methyl mercury to reduced sulfur groups in soil and stream organic matter as determined by Xray absorption spectroscopy and binding affinity studies, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 66, 3873-3885. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(02)00974-2
  27. Rabenstein, D.L., 1978, The aqueous solution chemistry of methylmercury and its complexes, Account. Chem. Res., 11, 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar50123a004
  28. Rabenstein, D.L. and Fairhurst, M.T., 1975, Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of the solution chemistry of metal complexes. XI. The binding of methylmercury by sulfhydryl-containing amino acids and by glutathione, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 97, 2086- 2092. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00841a015
  29. Rabenstein, D.L., Ozubko, R., Libich, S., Evans, C.A., Fairhurst, M.T., and Suvanprakorn, C., 1974, Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of the solution chemistry of metal complexes. X. Determination of formation constants of the methylmercury complexes of selected amines and aminocarboxylic acids, J. Coord. Chem., 3, 263-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958977408075860
  30. Ravichandran, M., 2004, Interactions between mercury and dissolved organic matter-a review, Chemosphere, 55, 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.011
  31. Rehr, J.J., Mustre de Leon, J., Zabinsky, S.I., and Albers, R.C., 1991, Theoretical X-ray absorption fine structure standards, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113, 5135-5140. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00014a001
  32. Skyllberg, U., Xia, K., Bloom, P.R., Nater, E.A., and Bleam, W.F., 2000, Binding of mercury(II) to reduced sulfur in soil organic matter along upland-peat soil transects, J. Environ. Qual., 29, 855-865.
  33. Tipping, E., 2007, Modelling the interactions of Hg(II) and methylmercury with humic substances using WHAM/Model VI, Appl. Geochem., 22, 1624-1635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.03.021
  34. Weber J.H., 1993, Review of possible paths for abiotic methylation of mercury(II) in the aquatic environment, Chemosphere, 26, 2063-2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(93)90032-Z
  35. Yao, A., Qui, R., Qing, C., Mu, S., and Reardon, E.J., 2011, Effects of humus on the environmental activity of mineralbound Hg: influence on Hg plant uptake, J. Soils Sediments, 11, 959-967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0370-3
  36. Yoon, S., Diener, L.M., Bloom, P.R., Nater, E.A., and Bleam, W.F., 2005, X-ray absorption studies of $CH_3Hg^+$-binding sites in humic substances, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 69, 1111-1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2004.07.036
  37. Xia, K., Skyllberg, U.L., Bleam, W.F., Bloom, P.R., Nater, E.A. and Helmke, P.A., 1999, X-ray absorption spectroscopic evidence for the complexation of Hg(II) by reduced sulfur in soil humic substances, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 257-261. https://doi.org/10.1021/es980433q