DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Wood Anatomy of Stem and Root in Korean-grown Yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipipfera L.)

  • Lee, Mi-Rim (Department of Forest Products & Biotechnology, College of Forest Science, Kookmin University) ;
  • Eom, Young-Geun (Department of Forest Products & Biotechnology, College of Forest Science, Kookmin University)
  • Received : 2011.09.09
  • Accepted : 2011.09.15
  • Published : 2011.09.25

Abstract

This study was carried out to offer basic information on the wood anatomy of domestic yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera L.), a new plantation species selected by Korea Forest Service as one of the promising hardwood and bioenergy sources of the future, through comparison of stem wood with root wood in the qualitative and quantitative features. In the qualitative anatomical features, growth rings were distinct in stem wood but relatively less distinct in root wood. And stem wood appeared to have pores in radial multiples of 2 to 5, sometimes clusters but root wood to have pores in radial multiples of 2 to 3, rarely clusters. And numbers of bars in scalariform perforation plates were somewhat numerous in vessel elements of root wood than in those of stem wood. Interestingly, on the other hand, more extraneous materials in the wood rays of tap root than in those of lateral root and stem were confirmed in the chemical composition analyses. In the quantitative anatomical features, pore densities were significantly greater but vessel elements were considerably narrower in stem wood than in root wood. Vessel elements and wood fibers of root wood were considerably longer than those of stem wood. Rays were somewhat more numerous in stem wood than in root wood, and only ray heights of stem wood were more or less greater in cell numbers but both ray heights and widths of stem wood were lower in dimension than those of root wood. The anatomical differences between stem wood and root wood were thought to be associated with different growth environments between the stem above ground and the root below ground.

Keywords

References

  1. Berlyn, G. P. and J. P. Miksche. 1976. Botanical microtechnique and cytochemistry. Iowa State Univ. Press, Iowa.
  2. Bowyer, J. L., R. Shmulski, and J. G. Haygreen. 2007. Forest products and wood science: An introduction. 5th ed., Blackwell Publishing, Iowa.
  3. Braun, H. J. 1984. The significance of the accessory tissues of the hydrosystem for osmotic water shifting as the second principle of water ascent, with some thoughts concerning the evolution of trees. IAWA Bull. n.s. 5: 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000414
  4. Browning, B. L. 1967. Methods of wood chemistry. Interscience Publishers, New York.
  5. Burtin, P., C. Jay-Allemand, J. P. Charpentierand, and G. Janin. 1998. Natural wood colouring process in Juglans sp. (J. nigra, J. regia and hybrid J. nigra x J. regia) depends on native phenolic compounds accumulated in the transition zone between sapwood and heartwood. Trees 12: 258-264.
  6. Butterfield, B. G., B. A. Meylan, and Y. G. Eom. 2000. Three dimensional structure of wood. WIT Consulting, Seoul.
  7. Carlquist, S. 1985. Observations on functional wood histology of vines and lianas: Vessel dimorphism, tracheids, vasicentric tracheids, narrow vessels, and parenchyma. Aliso 11: 139-157. https://doi.org/10.5642/aliso.19851102.03
  8. Chong, S. H. and B. S. Park. 2008. Wood properties of the useful tree species grown in Korea. New Research Book No. 29, Korea Forest Research Institute, Seoul.
  9. Cutler, D. F., P. J. Rudall, P. E. Gasson, and R. M. O. Gale. 1987. Root identification manual of trees and shrubs: A guide to the anatomy of roots of trees and shrubs hardy in Britain and Northern Europe. Chapman and Hall, London.
  10. Eom, Y. G., O. Kwon, R. B. Hanna, and R. W. Meyer. 2008. Anatomical comparison of North American eastern, southern, and western redcedar wood. Mokchae Konghak 36(2): 9-19. https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2008.36.2.009
  11. Ewers, F. W., M. R. Carlton, J. B. Fisher, K. J. Kolb, and M. T. Tyree. 1997. Vessel diameters in roots versus stems of tropical lianas and other growth forms. IAWA J. 18(3): 261-279. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90001490
  12. Fahn, A. 1990. Plant anatomy. 4th ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford.
  13. Goulart, S. L. and C. R. Marcati. 2008. Anatomia comparada do lenho em raiz e caule de Lippia salviifolia Cham. (Verbenaceae). Revista Brasil. Bot. 31(2): 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042008000200009
  14. Han, C. S. 1982. Studies on the properties of tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera L.). III. Analysis of chemical composition. Agr. and Life Sci. Res. 13: 73-78. Inst. Agr. Sci. Tech., Chonbuk National Univ., Jeonju.
  15. Heiss, A. G. 2000 onwards. Anatomy of European and North American woods: An interactive identification key. Version: 14th May 2009. http://www.holzanatomie.at. Accessed December 2010.
  16. Hitz, O. M., H. Gartner, I. Heinrich, and M. Monbaron. 2008. Wood anatomical changes in roots of European ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) after exposure. Dendrochronologia 25: 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2007.03.005
  17. Hoadley, R. B. 1990. Identifying wood: Accurate results with simple tools. Taunton Press, Newtown.
  18. Howard, E. T. 1973. Physical and chemical properties of slash pine parts. Wood Sci. 5(4): 312-317.
  19. IAWA Committee. 1989. IAWA list of microscopic features for hardwood identification. IAWA Bull. n. s. 10(3): 219-332.
  20. Itoh, T. 1996. Anatomical description of Japanese hardwoods II. Wood Research and Technical Notes No. 3266-176. Wood Research Institute, Kyoto Univ., Kyoto.
  21. Japan Wood Research Society. 1985. Wood science laboratory book. II. Chemistry. Chugai Sangyo Chosakai, Tokyo.
  22. Joaquim, A. P., G. H. D. Tonoli, S. F. dos Santos, and H. Savastano Jr. 2009. Sisal organosolv pulp as reinforcement for cement based composites. Materials Research 12(3): 305-314. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392009000300010
  23. Kim, H. S. 2004. Microscopic patterns of decay caused by Tyromyces palustris and Gloeophyllum trabeum in Korean red pine and radiata pine wood. M. S. Thesis, Graduate School, Kookmin Univ., Seoul.
  24. Lebedenko, L. A. 1962. Comparative anatomical analysis of the mature wood of roots and stems of some wood plants. Trudy Inst. Lesa i Drevesiny Akad. Nauk SSSR (Sib. Otdel.) 51: 124-134.
  25. Lee, P. W. 1997. Properties and uses of Korean woods. I. Wood structures, properties, and uses. Seoul National Univ. Press, Seoul.
  26. Lindorf, H. 1997. Wood and leaf anatomy in Sessea corymbiflora from an eco-logical perspective. IAWA J. 18: 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90001477
  27. Machado, S. R., V. Angyalossy-Alfonso, and B. L. de Morretes. 1997. Comparative wood anatomy of root and stem in Styrax camporum (Styracaceae). IAWA J. 18(1): 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90001454
  28. Machado, S. R., R. A. Rodella, V. Anryalossy, and C. R. Marcati. 2007. Structural variations in root and stem wood of Styrax (Styracaceae) from Brazilian forest and Cerrado. IAWA J. 28(2): 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90001632
  29. Magel, E., C. Jay-Allemend, and H. Ziegler. 1994. Formation of heartwood substances in the stemwood of Robinia pseudoacacia L.: II. Distribution of non-structural carbohydrates and wood extractives across the trunk. Trees 8: 165-171.
  30. Palhares, D., J. E. de Paula, L. A. Rodrigues Pereira, and C. E. dos Santos Silveira. 2007. Comparative wood anatomy of stem, root and xylopodium of Brosimum gaudichaudii (Moraceae). IAWA J. 28(1): 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90001621
  31. Panshin, A. J. and C. de Zeeuw. 1980. Textbook of wood technology. 4th ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.
  32. Psaras, G. K. and I. Sofroniou. 1999. Wood anatomy of Capparis spinosa from an ecological prespective. IAWA J. 20(4): 419-429. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90001567
  33. Psaras, G. K. and I. Sofroniou. 2004. Stem and root anatomy of the shrub Phlomis fruticosa (Labiatae). IAWA J. 25(1): 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000350
  34. Richter, H. G. and M. J. Dallwitz. 2000 onwards. Commercial timbers: Descriptions, illustrations, identification, and information retrieval. Version: 25th June 2009. http://delta-intkey.com. Accessed December 2010.
  35. Rao, R. V., B. Sharma, and R. Dayal. 1989. Anatomy of aerial rootwood of Sonneratia caseolaris (L.) Engler (Sonneratioideae). IAWA Bull. n. s. 10(4): 374-378. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90001126
  36. Ryu, K. O., W. J. Kim, I. S. Kim, H. S. Choi, D. H. Lee, and Y. W. Kim. 2008. Yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera L.): Growth characteristics and utilization technology. Research Report No. 320, Korea Forest Research Institute, Seoul.
  37. Schweingruber, F. H., A. Börner, and E.-D. Schulze. 2006. Atlas of woody plants: Evolution, structure, and environmental modifications. Springer, Jena.
  38. Stokke, D. D. and F. G. Manwiller. 1994. Proportions of wood elements in stem, branch, and root wood of black oak (Quercus velutina). IAWA J. 15(3): 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000612
  39. TAPPI T222 om-88. 1988. Acid-insoluble lignin in wood and pulp. Atlanta, GA, USA: Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry.
  40. TAPPI T264 om-88. 1988. Preparation of wood for chemical analysis. Atlanta, GA, USA: Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry.
  41. Timell, T. E. 1986. Compression wood in gymnosperms. Vols. 1-3. Springer-Veralg, Berlin.
  42. Wheeler, E. A. 1986. Vessels per square millimeter or vessel groups per square millimeter? IAWA Bull. n. s. 7(1): 73-74. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000444

Cited by

  1. Anatomical Characteristics of Paulownia tomentosa Root Wood vol.44, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2016.44.2.157