Characteristics of Vibration Response Imaging in Healthy Koreans

  • Choi, Kyu-Hee (Division of Allergy, Immune & Respiratory System, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Kwan-Il (Division of Allergy, Immune & Respiratory System, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Bang, Ji-Hyun (Division of Allergy, Immune & Respiratory System, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Hwan (Division of Allergy, Immune & Respiratory System, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Jun-Yong (Division of Allergy, Immune & Respiratory System, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Jung, Sung-Ki (Division of Allergy, Immune & Respiratory System, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Jung, Hee-Jae (Division of Allergy, Immune & Respiratory System, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University)
  • 투고 : 2011.06.20
  • 심사 : 2011.08.29
  • 발행 : 2011.11.30

초록

Background: Vibration response imaging (VRI) is a new technology that records energy generated by airflow during the respiration cycle. Analysis of lung sound using VRI may overcome the limitations of auscultation. Objectives: To set a VRI standard for healthy Koreans, we conducted a clinical assessment to evaluate breath sound images and quantification in healthy subjects and compared the findings with reported breath sound characteristics. Methods: Recordings were performed using the VRIxp. Eighty subjects took a deep breath four times during a 12-second interval while sitting upright. The quantitative aspect was analyzed using the VRI quantitative lung data (QLD) for total left lung, total right lung and for six lung regions: left upper lung (LUL), left middle lung (LML), left lower lung (LLL), right upper lung (RUL), right middle lung (RML), right lower lung (RLL). The qualitative aspect was provided through image assessments by three reviewers. Results: In all regions the left lung had significantly higher QLD than the right lung (P<0.005, paired t-test). The inter-rater agreement was 0.78. 84% of the images were found normal by the final assessment. Among the 16% (n=13) of images with abnormal final assessment, the most common flawed features were dynamic image (77%, n=10) and maximum energy frame (MEF) shape (77%, n=10). No significant differences were found between males and females for QLD but there were significant differences in qualitative aspects including dynamic images, MEF shape, and missing LLL. Conclusion: The characteristics of healthy Koreans are similar to those of Western subjects reported previously. VRI is easy to use and objective, and so is helpful to diagnose patients with respiratory diseases and to monitor the progress of diseases after medical treatments.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Murphy RL, Vyshedskiy A, Power-Charnitsky VA, Bana DS, Marinelli PM, Wong-Tse A, et al. Automated lung sound analysis in patients with pneumonia. Respir Care. 2004 Dec; 49(12):1490- 1497.
  2. Elphick HE, Lancaster GA, Solis A, Majumdar A, Gupta R, Smyth RL. Validity and reliability of acoustic analysis of respiratory sounds in infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2004 Nov; 89(11):1059-1063. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2003.046458
  3. Earis J, Cheetham B. Current methods used for computerized respiratory sound analysis. European Respiratory Review. 2000; 10(77):586-590.
  4. Pasterkamp H, Kraman SS, DeFrain PD, Wodicka GR. Measurement of respiratory acoustical signals. Comparison of sensors. Chest. 1993 Nov; 104(5): 1518-1525. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.104.5.1518
  5. Pasterkamp H, Kraman SS, Wodicka GR. Respiratory sounds. Advances beyond the stethoscope. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Sep; 156(3 Pt 1):974-987.
  6. Dellinger RP, Parrillo JE, Kushnir A, Rossi M, Kushnir I. Dynamic visualization of lung sounds with a vibration response device: a case series. Respiration. 2008; 75(1):60-72. https://doi.org/10.1159/000103558
  7. Yigla M, Gat M, Meyer JJ, Friedman PJ, Maher TM, Madison JM. Vibration response imaging technology in healthy subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Sep; 191(3):845-852. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3151
  8. Chung Dong P. Lung volumes, Intrapulmonary Gas Mixing and Gas Exchange of the Korean. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine. 1964; 7(8):501-519.
  9. Maher TM, Gat M, Allen D, Devaraj A, Wells AU, Geddes DM. Reproducibility of dynamically represented acoustic lung images from healthy individuals. Thorax. 2008 Jun; 63(6):542-548. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2007.086405
  10. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar; 86(2):420-428.
  11. Xie XJ, Titler MG, Clarke WR. Accounting for intraclass correlations and controlling for baseline differences in a cluster-randomised evidence-based practice intervention study. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2008; 5(2):95-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6787.2008.00125.x
  12. Bartziokas K, Daenas C, Preau S, Zygoulis P, Triantaris A, Kerenidi T, et al. Vibration response imaging: evaluation of rater agreement in healthy subjects and subjects with pneumonia. BMC Med Imaging.10:6.
  13. Li J, Cai BQ. Characteristics of vibration response imaging in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2009 Jun;31(3):335-338.
  14. Anantham D, Herth FJ, Majid A, Michaud G, Ernst A. Vibration response imaging in the detection of pleural effusions: a feasibility study. Respiration. 2009; 77(2):166-172. https://doi.org/10.1159/000168784
  15. Bodmann I, Dierich M, Fuehner T, Simon A, Welte T, Gottlieb J. Vibration response imaging (VRI) in lung transplant recipients. Ther Adv Respir Dis. Feb; 4(1):3-11.