References
- Hahn, D. et al., “KALIMER-600 preliminary conceptual design report,” KAERI/TR-2784/2004
- Planchon, H.P., Sackett, J.I., Golden, G.H., and Sevy, R.H., “Implications of the EBR-II inherent safety demonstration test,” Nucl. Eng. Des. 101, pp. 75-91
- Wade, D.C., Wigeland, R.A., and Hill, D.J., “The safety of the IFR,” Progress in Nuclear Energy 31, pp. 63-82
- Royl, P.H. et al., “Performance of metal and oxide fuel cores during accidents in Large Liquid-Metal-Cooled reactors,” Nucl. Technol. 97, pp. 198-210
- Yokoo T. and Ohta H., “ULOF and UTOP analyses of a large metal fuel FBR core using a detailed calculation system,” J. Nucl. Science and Technology, 38, pp. 444-452
-
Kwon, Y.M. et
$al.^1$ , “Evaluation of inherent safety features of the KALIMER-600 design concept for Anticipated Transient Without Scram events,” KAERI/TR-3163/2006 -
Kwon,
$Y.M.^2$ , “KALIMER-600 design data for the plant safety analysis,” KALIMER/SA221-WR-05, Rev.0/2006 - Guppy, J.G., “Super System Code (SSC, Rev.0) An advanced thermo-hydraulic simulation code for transient in LMFBRs,” NUREG/CR-3169
- Chang, W.P. et al., “Model development for analysis of the Korea Advanced Liquid Metal Reactor,” Nucl. Eng. and Design, 217, pp. 63-80
-
Kwon, Y.M. et
$al.^3$ , “Comparative analysis of an unprotected overpower transient in the KALIMER design using the SSC-K and the SAS4A/SASSYS-1 computer codes,” KAERI/TR-2202/2002 -
Kwon, Y.M. et
$al.^4$ , “Comparative analysis for evaluating passive safety design features of the KALIMER-150,” Trans. Ame. Nucl. Soc., 92, pp. 440-441 - Cahalan, J.E. et al., “Advanced LMR safety analysis capabilities in the SASSYS-1 and SAS4A computer codes,” Proceedings of the Int. Topical Meeting on Advanced Reactor Safety, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, ANS, pp. 17-21, 1994
- Derstine, K.L., “DIF3D : A code to solve one-, two-, and three-dimensional finite-difference diffusion theory problems,” ANL-82-64
- Kim, T.K. et al., “Development of a perturbation code for hexagonal core,” Proceedings of '98 KNS Autumn Meeting, Korea Nuclear Society, 1998
- Kwon, Y.M. et al5, “A plan for the development of the spatial kinetics and the detailed reactivity model for a fast reactor,” KAERI/TR-3071/2005
- Dunn, F.E. et al., “The SAS2A LMFBR accident-analysis computer code,” ANL-8183
- Chang, W.P. et al., “Sodium voiding analysis in KALIMER,” 9TH International Conference On Nuclear Engineering, Nice, France, April 2001
- Khatib-Rahbar, Mohsen et al., “Modeling and analysis of low heat flux natural convection sodium boiling in LMFBRs,” NUREG/CR-2006
- Chang, W.P. and Lee Y.B., “Development of a coolant analysis model for the sodium reactivity calculation in the KALIMER core,” KAERI/TR-3212/2006
- Wigeland, R.A., “Effect of a detailed radial core expansion reactivity feedback model on ATWS calculations using SASSYS/SAS4A,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 53, pp. 303-305
- Wigeland, R.A., “Comparison of the SASSYS/SAS4A radial core expansion reactivity feedback model and the empirical correlation for FFTF,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 55, pp. 423-424
- Hill, D.J. and Wigeland, R.A., “Validation of the SASSYS core radial expansion reactivity feedback model,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 56, pp. 380-381
- Darrington, T.M., “Non-Site-Specific Safety Report,” EFR Associates, A0-00-0-258-A
- Yamada, F., Kitamura, K., “Realistic safety margin analysis of 'MONJU' based on plant performance measurements,” 12TH International Conference On Nuclear Engineering, Arlington, Virginia, USA, April 2004