DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Human Factors in Ship Accidents in the Domestic Sea

국내 해양선박사고의 인적 오류의 요인 평가

  • Kim, Dong-Jin (Graduate School of International Studies, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kwak, Su-Yong (Graduate School of International Studies, Pusan National University)
  • 김동진 (부산대학교 국제전문대학원) ;
  • 곽수용 (부산대학교 국제전문대학원)
  • Received : 2011.01.31
  • Accepted : 2011.02.09
  • Published : 2011.02.28

Abstract

In this study, we investigated and identified criterial human factors(errors), most of which lead to terrible ship accidents such as collisions, sinking, fire and explosions resulting both in human lives and physical damages to ships as well as surrounding environments. To this end, we went through the accident reports of 413 cases over 2005~2009 period and classified the human factors into 6 major factors with 19 sub ones which were constructed in hierarchical order. The relative importance of major factors was calculated and among others the lack of awareness turned out to be the most important factor with the weight of 0.391. The contributions of the results in the research are two fold: it will help (i) identify the root causes of ship accidents and prevent further potential ship related incidents, (ii) analyze the degree of the risk associated with the ship accidents, when risk analysis is performed.

Keywords

References

  1. Baek, I. H., Transshipment Port Selection using ISM&AHP, The Journal Shipping and Logistics, Vol.53, 2007.
  2. Boom, H. C., Numerical simulation of a metro train fire, Canter very University, 2005.
  3. Chang, M. H., The Analysis of probability and Impact and Evaluation of Relative Information Systems Risk Factor in Maritime and Port Corporations, The Journal of Shipping and Logistics, Vol.25, No.1, 2009.
  4. Ruffin, E., et al., "Numerical simulation of locomotive fires in the Lyonturin tunnel", International conference, 1999.
  5. Geijerstam, K. and Svensson, H., Ship collision risk, Report 5275, Lund, 2008.
  6. Kim, D. S., et al., A proposition of Accidents Causation Model for the Analysis of Human Error Accidents in Railway operation, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, Vol.29, No.2, pp.241-248, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2010.29.2.241
  7. Kim, S. K., et al., Crew resource management, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, Vol.28, No.1 pp.37-51, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2009.28.1.037
  8. Kim, Y. C. and Chang S. R., A study of implementation of the ergonomics program in a ship building company, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, Vol.29, No.4 pp.487-493, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2010.29.4.487
  9. Lee, C. H., et al., A Study on Drawing Priority of Competitiveness Factorsof Ship Management Company in Korea Using AHP, Journal of Navigation and Port Research, Vol.34, No.3., pp.243-249, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2010.34.3.243
  10. Rausand, M., Some basic risk concepts, Norwegian University., 2005.
  11. Park, J. Y and Cho, A., A safety evaluation method for a product design planning stage, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, Vol.27, No.2 pp15-24, 2008. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2008.27.2.015
  12. Rao, P. G. and Raghavan, K. V., Hazard and risk potential of chemical handling at ports, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 9, NO3, pp.199-204, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-4230(96)00017-4
  13. Ronza, A., et al., A quantitative risk analysis approach to port hydrocarbon logistics, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol.A128, pp.10-24, 2006.
  14. Sin, M. J., et al., A framework for computerized human error analysis system, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, Vol.27, No.3, pp.43-52, 2008. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2008.27.3.043
  15. Jomkman, S. N., Evaluation of tunnel safety and cost effectiveness of measures, Safety and Reliability, 2003.
  16. Trbojevic., et al., Risk based methodology for safety improvements in ports, Journal of Hazardous Materials, VOL.71, pp.467-480, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00094-1
  17. Winston, E. L., "Simulation modeling using @RISK", Duxbury, 2001.

Cited by

  1. Object Detection Method in Sea Environment Using Fast Region Merge Algorithm vol.22, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5391/JKIIS.2012.22.5.610
  2. Hazardous and Noxious Substances(HNS) Risk Assessment and Accident Prevention Measures on Domestic Marine Transportation vol.19, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2013.19.2.145
  3. Image Analysis Module for AR-based Navigation Information Display vol.27, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5574/KSOE.2013.27.3.022
  4. A study on the collision between fishing vessel and non fishing vessel using the analysis of written verdict vol.49, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2013.49.2.136
  5. Risk Analysis of Container Ship Accidents and Risk Mitigation Measures vol.22, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2016.22.3.259
  6. An Analysis of Marine Casualty Reduction by SMART Navigation Service: Accident Vulnerability Monitoring System (SV10) vol.24, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2018.24.5.504